The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Googlewhack trick used to slip junk mail past spam filters

Well this is awfully WWI... 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 08:48 GMT

Paris Hilton

Looks like the trench wars of spam are still going.

Slow, Slow Symantec 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 09:09 GMT

Coat

These 'search result' URLs have been appearing for at least 6 months, and have been blocked - at least by gmail - for much of that time.

Where have Symantec been?

Brightmail? 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 09:43 GMT

Flame

Brightmail couldn't spot a spammy mail if it slapped them in the face. $60-million world wide sales in a pretty lucrative market space is a piss poor effort. Develop new technology indeed. Pfft.

As for the junk mailing scum who infest the ether, I wish it was legal to shoot the bastards. Open season on the ROCSO list.

I guess that's the end of tinyurl then. 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 09:52 GMT

Unhappy

I guess that's the end of tinyurl then.

Reverse Engineering ??? 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 12:26 GMT

Alien

If you look at the Symantec link, they mention they did some reverse engineering. What was the reverse engineering which their scientists did you wonder?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=inurl:replica%20intext:%22Perfect+cheap+replica+watches+online.%22&btnI=

Take out the "%22&btnI=" at the end of the url

Brilliant !!!

Title 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 14:15 GMT

Unhappy

Is this why my earlier search for "aubergine" got this?

"We're sorry...

... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now. "

http://www.google.co.uk/sorry/?continue=http://www.google.co.uk/search%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Daubergine%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3D

(BTW: How about giving us the option of an icon that looks like someone banging their head on the desk? )

@Trinity 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 16:57 GMT

Are you using a web proxy at all? I've encountered the same error when searching google through a proxy.

Re: I guess that's the end of tinyurl then. 

Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 18:53 GMT

Go

Here's an alternative that avoids the disguising feature of tinyurl AND also eliminates accidental clicks on links while avoiding having to memorize and retype complicated URLs - telldodo. (for example, tell dodo: kentucky button suspense)

The nice thing about my spam filter 

Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 07:55 GMT

is that it evolves a lot faster than Symantec (anyone surprised ? thought not).

Any sender that is not on my whitelist get his mail sent to the spam bin. In the spam bin, any string that corresponds to anything I have previously flagged gets the mail deleted permanently.

End of story.

I haven't seen any of these reselling jokes since I flagged it five months ago. Besides, I don't click on links sent to me by people I don't know.

preview feature in tinyurl 

Posted Saturday 10th November 2007 12:52 GMT

Jobs Halo

"The following URL:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/10/dwarf_stars/

has a length of 52 characters and resulted in the following TinyURL which has a length of 25 characters:

http://tinyurl.com/2cf8pr

Or, give your recipients confidence with a preview TinyURL:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cf8pr"

OK for tinyurl among friends; no guarantee, of course, for links from strangers.

Remember: don't take sweeties from strange men