From that angle it looks a little bit like the Douglas F4D Skyray of the late 1940s, if you squint and you're a bit drunk. Perhaps that's why they called it the Skyray 48. Could this be the first remote-controlled mini-scale concept model that kids will want to have posters of on their bedroom walls?

Must be British then. Should be the national motto that.

" "With slats retracted the take-off and landing approach speeds are about 70 knots (129kph), [which is] 15 knots higher than with slats extended," Boeing X-48B boffin Norman Princeon told Flight "

How is this a news story, that's what slats do - lower the take-off and landing speeds - Handley Page told the world that around 1919. HP had a biplane with a stall speed of 33 mph in 1934 and the (jet powered) Hunting H.126 32 mph in the 60s.

There is nothing new about flying wings. Avro Vulcan for one. And that was certainly not quiet. Bloody hell no!

Maybe the devil is in the detail.

I think the point is that the difference between slats out and in is only 15 knots, making it possible? to land without extending the slats ... resulting in a considerable reduction in landing noise ;)

...of picking one of these babies up at my local model store?

I want one.

Here is a very good picture of a 40 year old airplane:

http://www.testpilot.ru/russia/tupolev/144/tu144_1.htm

It is done from the right angle so you can see the blend. It is not a big blend, but blend none the less.

Apparently, a more blended profile was tested during the early parts of the test program, but abandoned due to the difficulty in manufacturing.

Anyway... History repeating (and so much for the aforementioned airplane being a "copy of concorde").

You can just tell... They're a union... One person working, two people watching, one more person on a beer run.

was a delta wing configuration, not a true flying wing.

make sure you are clear between a delta winged aircraft and a flying wing. The latter is a blended wing body where the whole aircraft is the lifting mass. A Delta wing aircraft is still a tube with wings.

Like most things aeronautical, it was German. May I introduce the pre-war Junkers G38:

http://www.return2style.de/swingaring/amig38.htm

A passenger aircraft which could carry passengers inside the thick wings as well as the fuselage.

Well, seeing as how it's made in the UK, it's doomed. They'll figure out a way to do it really cheap, then the entire program will inexplicably grow 5000% in the first year, and then the only working prototype will crash (or disappear in orbit around another planet).

Proudly made in the U.K. hahaha.

Just send the contract to the Yanks and be done with it, it's cheaper in the long run and it only costs you your privacy.

Check this whole range of Horten machines:

http://www.nurflugel.com/Nurflugel/Horten_Nurflugels/horten_nurflugels.html

Look, it looks cool, so can we just build it and be done with it please! The law of building stuff is:

Is it cool?

If cool build, if not what you doing designing uncool stuff!

<<There is nothing new about flying wings. Avro Vulcan for one. And that was certainly not quiet. Bloody hell no!>>

Too right! I was at an airshow years ago when I got hit by the full force of the engines directed at me from one of the last remaining birds flying. It must've been a few hundred yards away and airborne, but it was fuc*king painfully deafening. Almost knocked me off my feet.