Comments on “Shrinking patch windows hit by automated attacks” • The Register

Comments on: Shrinking patch windows hit by automated attacks

Back to the article
Comments on this article are now closed

So what's there to stop some hacker from buying a legal copy of the app...

By Ishkandar Posted Monday 21st April 2008 14:43 GMT

...and legally get the (secure ??) patch, reverse engineer that and create an attack based on the reverse engineering ??

Who guards the guardians ??

@Ishkandar - Received patch to exploit window

By Brian Miller Posted Monday 21st April 2008 18:37 GMT

This is what is being done on Windows all the time. To combat this, Microsoft has been releasing "obfuscated" patches where a simple "diff" will generate too much information to dig through.

If the hacker is supported by an organization (i.e., he has a budget) then of course he'll get the application, along with updates. The automated tools are applied to create something which will crash the app, which gives the hacker the quick toe-hold he needs to create something to compromise the app. When the app crashes, that means that it has executed something it wasn't supposed to. Then exploit code is written to not crash the app, but compromise it.