The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Celebrity publicist develops mathematical 'fame formula'

Surely... 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 12:39 GMT

Fame, infact, has a half life, with the value of B altering the decay rate.

To extend his fame 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 12:48 GMT

maybe he'll work on the formula for infamy next (much more interesting).

You all have too much time on your hands. 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 12:48 GMT

Stop

The scientists must be bored, so look for some fame formula, the el-reg decides to analyse this waste of time, and in-doing, wastes yet more time.

Any normal person can work out that if someone was famous before they married another famous person, they will become more famous for a bit, and this will wane until we hear they are in rehab......

Now get on with proper news!

Mmmmm 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 12:49 GMT

Thumb Down

ft = b + p((1/10t) + (1/2t2))

"At t = 0, f is infinite".

Last time I've checked this at t=0 the function is b.

If p is negative then it is an inverted parabola

.. perhaps is still bullshit.

Wow... 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 12:56 GMT

Dead Vulture

Im never ever getting that 5 minutes back........

Re: You all have too much time on your hands. 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 12:56 GMT

(Written by Reg staff.)

It never ceases to amaze and amuse me how much time people will spend explaining that they don't want to waste their time on something they consider to be a gross waste of everyone's time.

Personally I don't care that I just wasted my time pointing this out. I am all about the time-wasting.

Fame ...... Fool's Gold 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:02 GMT

The Fame Formula: How Hollywood's Fixers, Fakers and Star Makers Created the Celebrity Industry by Mark Borkowski

Yes, and if it is an Artificial Construct of no Real Intrinsic Value, can it be Ruthlessly and Mercilessly Milked to Cause Collapse of a Virtual Economy....... and they would probably make a Film about IT too, if they had a Script and Beta SMARTs.

SPRatman and the Fall Of Capitalism to AIRHeads and Deadheads. The Dark NeoCon Knightmare....... Playing in a Theatre of Operations soon, near you. :-)

Does Russia have a Film Industry/Perception Management and Dream Machine?

Or China?

Or Japan?

Or UK?

Just for a Change of Scene and Self Serving Spin.

Another flaw... 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:04 GMT

Thumb Down

Surely the nature of the spike alters the rate of decay of fame?

For example, being shot dead by a jealous lover will generate a lot of column inches in the immediate term and will necessarily be followed up by a trial in about 12 months' time.

The model takes a truly consequent event like this as independent, which is absurd in terms of statistical relationships.

Similarly, releasing a film (AKA "movie" in Americanese) will generate a large spike in publicity, followed by a consequent smaller spike as part of the DVD release. And again, this model takes these as independent events.

Checking in to rehab means later checking out of rehab.

Marriage results in divorce. (Remember, this is celebrity land.)

A new album will be accompanied by a tour 6 months later. And in the world of pop, it will generate a series of singles releases, so there will be a series of interrelated spikes.

I could go on....

Is It me cause all I can hear is bla bla bla 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:07 GMT

IT Angle

#include MyHumbleOpinion;

this.value = (bullshit + e^WTF);

These formula 'news' stories annoy me. 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:10 GMT

Boffin

They're always based on meaningless formulae which tend to have painstakingly crafted constants multiplied by unquantifiable values ('fun factor', 'base fame', 'happiness'). And they're invariably just pathetic attempts to plug a new book or product anyway, which the press (by which I normally mean the BBC News website) just lap up.

The level of irritation (I) they cause is roughly:

I = (0.7(NQ)^2 + 1.6 Y) / B

Where N is the average newsworthiness of the stories it appears above in the list of headlines, Q is the quantity of real news stories that were ignored because they weren't as 'interesting', Y is the inanity of the variables used, and B is the number of beers I've had.

It's perhaps interesting to note that as B tends towards infinity, I fall over.

Disgraceful omission 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:15 GMT

Boffin

I don't care if you get the right numbers - without proper units it's a meaningless answer.

May I suggest that it should probably be measured in hiltons?

oh it really works 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:24 GMT

Pirate

Being fairly good with numbers myself I have worked out that I am in fact already as famous and popular as Amy winehouse..

there's more on it all here..

http://www.thefameformula.com

There's an online fame calculator that you can try...

typesetting error? 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:38 GMT

Happy

probably the formula reads:

F(t) = b + p(1/(10t) + 1/(2t^2))

Then at t=0, F is infinity. It is not that hard to typeset simple math formulas so their meaning is not ambiguous. I am amazed how many times people get it wrong. I am also amazed why such type of "magical" formulas usually restrict to simplest relationships: sums, polynomials, power functions and etc. Why nobody uses the inverse of hyperbolic sine for example? It is much more impressive :)

@Antonio 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 13:47 GMT

You've got things reversed.

If you put in t=0:

f(0) = b + p((1/10t) + (1/2t^2))

= b + p(1/0 + 1/0)

= b + p( <inf> + <inf>)

Chucking some random figures into a.n.other spreadsheet program (OK, I admit it, I used excel) shows that this is something looking almost like an exponential decay - which I probably hould have worked out from the fact that there's a t^2 in there.

So glad I worked that out. :)

"It's not quite devil worship," 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 14:01 GMT

Happy

He's right.

Devil-worshippers have amazing parties. I can't imagine anything worse than being stuck in a room full of attention-desperate Z-list wannabes all snaffling the complimentary Bucks Fizz*.

*OK, I can imagine some worse things. But not many.

@Antonio 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 14:15 GMT

Unhappy

Not quite... I'll explain (although I shouldn't need to here):

f(t)=b+p((1/10t)+(1/2t^2))

Let t=0

f(0)=b+p((1/0+1/0))

f(0)=b+assert failed

core dumped

@Prof O. Und 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 14:20 GMT

Coat

>maybe he'll work on the formula for infamy next (much more interesting).

I understand that infamy is measured in a unit called CoCs - "Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it in for me!"

Mine's the one with Kenneth Williams biography in the pocket.

@ Adrian Jackson 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 14:44 GMT

Thumb Up

That comment made the article worth reading.

Slow day in Whitehall? 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 14:48 GMT

Coat

At least Mr Page has (finally) found something they actually *do* do cheaper and better in America - make people (in)famous.

Mine's the one with the kevlar lining and the Mickey Mouse badge on the pocket...

@AC (@Prof O Und) 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 14:50 GMT

Coat

"unit called CoCs"

What, Call(s) Of Cthulhu?

Mine's the one with the Elder Sign on the back and the Tyndalos doggie snack in the inside pocket...

"Hastur? Hastur? Is there a Hastur in the house? Oh, buggAARRGGHH!!"

when B = Bullshit 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:00 GMT

can we sing let it B??

Mark Borowski 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:05 GMT

Funny, just noticed the same name here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2008/07/why_hoax.html

infamy, infamy ... 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:08 GMT

IT Angle

I prefer the Register's formula. It's a better fit with my epectations.

I'm going to live forever, I'm going to learn how to fly - high 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:12 GMT

Boffin

I feel compelled to note Borkowski's appalling lack of dimensional analysis.

Sweet Charity (it would need to be, my Dear!) 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:26 GMT

Hey Sub-Editor, waste as little time with me......

Frankie Goes to Hollywood got there first. 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:45 GMT

Boffin

I think this is just a generalised version of the equation associated with the band "Frankie Goes to Hollywood".

A simplified version was derived by the mathematicians who compiled "The Spitting Image Book".

Quote:

Frankie Go Downhill

Welcome to the Same Record as Last Time

[hype + bullshit + talentless Liverpudlians] + Trevor Horn = FRANKIE!

FRANKIE - Trevor Horn = not much to be honest

Unquote.

NB: Trevor Horn was their producer. When most of the group (including the lead singer) failed to turn up to record "Relax," Horn went ahead and completed the track without them.

still having trouble with the maths here 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 16:00 GMT

Boffin

I am sure there should be an additional component to the equation but cannot for the life of me work out whether one should attribute an inverse or directly proportional relationship between "fame" and "showing off yer pishflaps in public"

of far more use 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 16:35 GMT

Flame

would be a formula that accurately allowed us to predict the worst policians by measuring their hypocrisy, fascism ratio, lack of common sense, total ignorance, and ease of purchase.

Math teacher's horror 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 16:51 GMT

Gates Halo

How many people reading an IT news site follow Mr. Page's lead and wrongly belief

1/10t=1/(10t) and not (1/10)t.

Luckily, MS Excel is on the right track.

That Dragan Dabic hoax website (was re: Mark Borowski) 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 18:27 GMT

Happy

<notices stencilled rat at bottom of page>

Holy crap, it's Banksy!

;-) heh. funny guy.

Faintly refreshing 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 19:56 GMT

At least the PR wonks are admitting they made up the formula rather than shopping around for a Professor in need of a cheque.

re: math teacher's horror 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 21:01 GMT

Boffin

How many people with no mathematical training whatsoever follow Mr. Borowski's lead and create a formula which ignores the standard order of operations and think that 1/10t is the same as 1/(10t)?

I don't know how many such formulae there are attempting to quantify the unquantifiable. So we will now have Celebrity "Science" as a field of study alongside Political "Science" and all the other subjects with "science" in their name, that aren't.

I once heard that Policticians all believe they are Economists, Economists all believe they are Sociologists, Sociologists all believe they are Psychologists, Psychologists believe they are Biologists, Biologists believe they are Biochemists, Biochemists believe they are Physical Chemists, Physical Chemists believe they are Physicists, Physicists believe they are Mathematicians, and Mathematicians believe they are God. But God is an Astronomer.

As a mathematician, I resemble that remark, but I sure hope we don't have to put publicists on that list.

-Chris

@ Sarah Bee & @ TIM 

Posted Monday 28th July 2008 21:57 GMT

Alert

I´ll go little bit further on your train of thought: It is utterly amazing, awe inspiring and generally mindbaffling (WOW) that this person is actually earning money selling his book........ I feel humbled. We humans really deserve what we get

@Chris and "$some_new science" 

Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 00:41 GMT

Dead Vulture

Ayep, you got that right. And speaking of bullshit "forumula" creation, the section of the federal bureaucracy that deals with alcohol abuse has this bit in one of its "how to complete the client intake form" manuals:

Weekly = how often/days X how much/# drinks

It was only after I read the "explanation" in the subsequent paragraph that I learned that the mathematical order of operations does not apply here, and that the "equation" could have been more clearly spelled out as "weekly = (number of days per week in which alcohol is consumed) X (average number of drinks consumed on each of those days)".

Vomiting vulture (think cheap red wine) because the equation should better accommodate "I drink until I puke" as an input.

@Chris and "$some_new science", P.S. 

Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 00:42 GMT

Dead Vulture

s/forumula/formula/ig; #dummycake

wait a minute.... 

Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 14:19 GMT

amanfrommars' comments nearly made sense.

I thougjht it would be Max Clifford pumping out this kind of bilge.

wazzza .... harra ...wha? 

Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 14:41 GMT

what happened ... is the cricket over ... where's my teeth ... ?

Plucking numbers from thin air 

Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 11:08 GMT

Black Helicopters

That's a fantastic equation you have there - define some variables, assign these variables from an absolutely arbitrary manner (i.e. thin air) and it'll make up what you want.

Tell you what, here's a similar formula for the success of Microsoft Windows Vista in a given market:

c = (u*n)t

Where c = suCcess, u=Units sold, n=Nation or territory and t=Totally made up value plucked from the amount of snuffalumps you saw in mcsnuffaland last snuffaThursday, around snuffingstonstopgo o'clock.

Arm candy, 200 years later. 

Posted Thursday 31st July 2008 00:13 GMT

It's not only history geeks who know about Lady Hamilton. At least a few town planners do, too. There's a development named 'Trafalgar Park' in Kingston, Jamaica which features a 'Lady Hamilton Drive' which intersects a 'Lord Nelson Way'.

It should be noted that someone likes his little jokes... Trafalgar Park is located between the British High Commission and the French Embassy.

Don’t Miss

email symbolStill sending naked email? Get your protection here

Security How-to Buckle your seatbelt, encrypt your bits

Google's Satan phoneT-Mobile G1 Google Android-based smartphone

Review Operating System 1, Hardware 0

Ubuntu teaser Ubuntu 8.10 - All Hail new Network Manager

Review The good kind of UI theft

OpenOffice_logoOpenOffice 3.0 - the only option for masochistic Linux users

Review And linear optimizing Mactards