The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Microsoft dashes hopes for 'major' Windows server upgrade

Again? 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 17:46 GMT

Dead Vulture

How many years we've heard that next Windows/Windows Server/SQL Server/Exchange/Office is just over the corner? With all those new great features.

We're getting bored with this. We all know what it means, all delays, hype and then nothing of major interest. Vista calling once again?

Not really an issue for me 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 18:17 GMT

I think Server 2008 is a damned fine product as it is.

"compatibility with previous versions of Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 is a design goal." 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 19:08 GMT

And we know what usually happens with MS "design goals...

WHS 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 20:43 GMT

The important question on everyone's (mine) minds is are they going to port WHS to Small Business 2008 so we can get a 64b OS for the WHS community.

Not more windows surely 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 21:16 GMT

Meh, we've not even started rolling out server 2008 yet, they are having a giggle if they think people will keep upgrading.

Vista pushing 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 21:21 GMT

Unhappy

"compatibility with previous versions of Windows Vista"

Not XP then... surprised ?

@Jack Harrer 

Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 21:25 GMT

The new version /must/ always be over the corner. Otherwise software company like Microsoft would have to fire programmers and dissolve. Or change modus operandi, but that takes lots of courage.

Cognitive dissonance 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 01:13 GMT

Stop

Windows 7 Server (internal codename) == Windows Server 2008 R2 (product name)

Holy @#$. Those bastards! I knew Windows 7 was a lie! It's gonna be a point release of Vista two years too late.

title here 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 02:52 GMT

Coat

"...compatibility with previous versions of Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 is a design own goal."

FIXED ;)

*too long for title :(

They miss the objective 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 06:52 GMT

Thumb Down

"compatibility with previous versions of Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 is a design goal."

What customers want is perfect compatibility with XP, not Vista!

If they missed the point at the design goal stage i am worried about the final product...

Windows Vista Bashing Server Edition 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 07:19 GMT

Gates Horns

Where the hell are the MS fanbois to defend the behemoth? Could it be that Vista has killed them all off?

surely 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 07:45 GMT

Surely compatibility with Vista/2008 is a design REQUIREMENT not a fekkin goal. sheeesh.

Move along - no story here 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 08:17 GMT

Why the fuss ? Where's the story ?

As far as the server road map is concerned it's been around for 5 years. Two years after the initial release there is the R2 release.

The reason for an R2 release is that it should coincide with the release of a new version of the workstation and keeps client/server functionality aligned.

There's absolutely nothing new here, the information is at least 5 years old.

Oooh, oooh, I've got a better name. 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 09:12 GMT

Pirate

Windows Server 2009? No way will it be released in 2008... and I'll eat a chocolate hat if it does.

Windows Server 2008 R2 

Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 12:52 GMT

Lets be honest here, how long until Windows Server 2008 SP1 before anyone will seriously consider buying and upgrading their systems... only to find that the applications and tools you actually need will have to be reg hacked to make them work. Linux anyone?

definition? 

Posted Thursday 21st August 2008 14:13 GMT

Major upgrade as in embodies one or more significant technical improvements?

or

Major upgrade as in embodies the potential for significant profitability improvements?

or 

Posted Monday 25th August 2008 11:26 GMT

theyve released most people who code and do IT tech prefer windows to look like win98 shell. and still have to add it to windows 7