MS Death List II – enemies scheme was live

And the programme was approved by Gates


MS on Trial Our report of Microsoft's 'friends and enemies list' last week (See story) was uncharacteristically favourable to Microsoft, according to Bristol Software. Microsoft has shrugged-off the list, which suggests treating software companies differently depending on who's side they're on, as the work of a new staffer, and something that was never implemented. Wrong and wrong, says Bristol. "The terminology was created by Dan Neault, who has been with Microsoft since 1995, and is a director," says a Bristol spokeswoman. "The programme was implemented, and Microsoft VP Bob Muglia sent an email to Bill Gates saying that the programme was being successful (in keeping people from using Java). Neault testified that Bill Gates approved the programme." The list first surfaced in the Bristol trial, and the transcripts support this interpretation. It also popped up briefly in the DoJ trial last week. Here, Neault explains his use of the expression friend, enemy of neutral: "It's a rather clumsy way to articulate it. One that we made smarter when we made this a littlee bit more formal. That was a carry-over from my days at Boeing doing military analysis where they do identify friend, foe or neutral [you can put your own gag in here if you like] ... what it was doing is setting the bar for how carefully we looked at a request for a waiver [of a licence fee]." So clearly the early concept as put forward by Neault envisaged linkage between Microsoft helping software developers by giving them waivers and the developers supporting Microsoft aims and objectives. The plan was modified, he explained under questioning from Microsoft's lawyer, because it was too broad, "a company wouldn't necessarily be a foe or hostile... so I should say really in this product are they trying to use our intellectual property against us." This didn't work entirely either, as he said even apparent friends could fail this test. Now, Bill's involvement. The waiver programme "was approved at a higher level than Bob [Muglia]." A memo from Muglia to Gates produced at the trial says: "This week I approved an agreement with Mainsoft," and Neault says: "The idea of the waiver had received Bill Gates' approval." And here's Muglia reporting to Gates: "We're making progress with enterprise ISVs who were thinking Java to get cross-platform, cutting the royalties upon MS... review to Mainsoft has had the intended effect." Wriggling somewhat, Neault is then forced to answer that slowing up Java adoption was one of the effects of the waiver programme. And here's how it goes when you've become a firm MS ally, like Mainsoft. Muglia again: "Now I think it may not be necessary to further anoint MainSoft and, in fact, it wouldn't hurt to give them a little competition. We are close to settling our differences with Bristol, and assuming these can be resolved, I'm inclined to give them similar rights to cut royalties and put MainSoft and Bristol in competition with each other." This took place in February 1998, almost three years into the 'junior' executive's career at Microsoft. Sounds pretty much like a friends and enemies list in operation, doesn't it? ® Complete Register Trial coverage


Other stories you might like

  • Apple's latest security feature could literally save lives
    Cupertino is so sure of Lockdown Mode it's offering $2m to bug hunters to break it

    Apple's latest security feature won't be used by most of its customers, but those who need Lockdown Mode could find it to be a literal life saver.

    The functionality, coming with iOS/iPadOS 16 and macOS Ventura, dramatically shrinks an iDevice's attack surface by disabling many of its features. It's designed to protect the small number of Apple users who, "because of who they are or what they do, may be personally targeted by some of the most sophisticated digital threats, such as those from NSO Group and other private companies developing state-sponsored mercenary spyware," Apple said in a statement. 

    Lockdown, thus, effectively reduces the number of potential vulnerabilities spyware could exploit to compromise a device, cutting the possible routes into surveillance targets' kit.

    Continue reading
  • Has Intel gone too far with its Ohio fab 'delay' stunt?
    With construction unceremoniously underway, x86 giant may have overplayed its hand

    COMMENT The way Intel has been talking about the status of its $20 billion Ohio fab project, you would be forgiven if you assumed that construction on the Midwest mega-site has been delayed in light of Congress struggling to pass a large subsidies package that would support new American chip factories.

    When Intel delayed a groundbreaking ceremony for the Ohio manufacturing site two weeks ago out of frustration over the subsidies inaction, some headlines may have given you the impression the semiconductor giant was putting off construction entirely.

    However, an Intel spokesperson made it clear to The Register and others at the time that the start date for construction had not changed.

    Continue reading
  • Hive ransomware gang rapidly evolves with complex encryption, Rust code
    RaaS malware devs have been busy bees

    The Hive group, which has become one of the most prolific ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operators, has significantly overhauled its malware, including migrating the code to the Rust programming language and using a more complex file encryption process.

    Researchers at the Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) uncovered the Hive variant while analyzing a change in the group's methods.

    "With its latest variant carrying several major upgrades, Hive also proves it's one of the fastest evolving ransomware families, exemplifying the continuously changing ransomware ecosystem," the researchers said in a write-up this week.

    Continue reading
  • What do you mean your exaflop is better than mine?
    Gaming the system was fine for a while, now it's time to get precise about precision

    Comment A multi-exaflop supercomputer the size of your mini-fridge? Sure, but read the fine print and you may discover those performance figures have been a bit … stretched.

    As more chipmakers bake support for 8-bit floating point (FP8) math into next-gen silicon, we can expect an era of increasingly wild AI performance claims that differ dramatically from the standard way of measuring large system performance, using double-precision 64-bit floating point or FP64.

    When vendors shout about exascale performance, be aware that some will use FP8 and some FP64, and it's important to know which is being used as a metric. A computer system that can achieve (say) 200 peta-FLOPS of FP64 is a much more powerful beast than a system capable of 200 peta-FLOPS at just FP8.

    Continue reading
  • Meta's AI translation breaks 200 language barrier
    Open source model improves translation of rarer spoken languages by 70%

    Meta's quest to translate underserved languages is marking its first victory with the open source release of a language model able to decipher 202 languages.

    Named after Meta's No Language Left Behind initiative and dubbed NLLB-200, the model is the first able to translate so many languages, according to its makers, all with the goal to improve translation for languages overlooked by similar projects. 

    "The vast majority of improvements made in machine translation in the last decades have been for high-resource languages," Meta researchers wrote in a paper [PDF]. "While machine translation continues to grow, the fruits it bears are unevenly distributed," they said. 

    Continue reading
  • Tracking cookies found in more than half of G20 government websites
    Sorry, conspiracy theorists, it's more likely sloppy webdev work rather than spying

    We expect a certain amount of cookie-based tracking on retail websites and social networks, but in some countries up to 90 percent of government sites have implemented trackers – and serve them seemingly without user consent. 

    A study evaluated more than 118,000 URLs of 5,500 government websites – think .gov, .gov.uk. .gov.au, .gc.ca, etc – hosted in the twenty largest global economies – the G20 – and discovered a surprising tracking cookie problem, even among countries party to Europe's GDPR and those who have their own data privacy regulations.

    On average, the study found, more than half of cookies created on G20 government websites were third-party cookies, meaning they were created by outside entities typically to collect information on the user. At least 10 percent, going up to 90 percent, come from known third party cookies or trackers, we're told.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022