Napster to close on Friday

Boies fails to swing Judge Marilyn


A San Francisco judge has given Napster until midnight on Friday US Pacific Time to stop aiding the exchange of copyright music, or close down.

In a hearing, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel accepted many of the Recording Industry Association of America's arguments, most ominously by refusing to accept Napster's proposition that personal computers are copying devices, and therefore qualify for the personal use provision of the Audio Home Recording Act.
By referring to "massive infringement" the Judge also denied Napster the safe harbour provision of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), which allows the defendant to stave off wholesale injunctions by blocking individual users.

But Judge Hall also requested that the RIAA post a $5m bond to cover loss of earnings by Napster if it is temporary closed down and then later prevails. The RIAA pledged - and subsequently lost - a similar bond when it unsuccessfully tried to prevent the release of Diamond's Rio MP3 player.

In a short prepared statement broadcast yesterday evening San Francisco time, Napster's CEO Hank Barry said that Napster planned to comply with the order, barring a successful eleventh hour appeal. "The judge said that one-to-one non-commercial file sharing violates the law. We will fight this in a variety of ways," he added, without elaborating.

"Napster wrote the software, it's up to them to write software that will remove from users the ability to copy copyrighted material. They created a monster" said the Judge. ®

Related Stories
The Register Full Coverage: Napster vs. RIAA
RIAA dubs Napster defence 'patently baseless'
Napster details copyright case defence

Related Link
Boies' Napster defence


Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022