Nvidia agrees to buy ailing 3dfx for $112m

3dfx will lay off most of staff and dissolve


The PC sales slowdown today claimed fresh blood: 3dfx has decided to shut its doors and flog most of its assets to Nvidia for $112 million.

Today Nvidia agreed to pay $70 million cash and one million in shares for the rival graphics card chipmaker, whilst loaning 3dfx $15 million that will be credited to the cash part of the price when the deal is completed.

3dfx, which has been locked in a patent infringement battle with Nvidia, today said it would cut "substantially all" of its workforce by early next year, plus reduce office space and other expenses.

Once the assets are sold off the company will dissolve.

In a conference call tonight execs said they had considered "a wide range of other options", including mergers or bankruptcy, before selling out.

But Alex Leupp, 3dfx CEO, commented: "We strongly believe that to reduce expenses, sell our assets and dissolve the company provides the highest return to our creditors, shareholders, and employees."

The deal ends the patent infringement litigation between the two companies.

After markets closed, 3dfx also recorded a net loss of $178.6 million for the third quarter. Sales dropped 63 per cent to $39.2 million in the period ended 31 October. "Our financial results illustrate the dramatic shift we've seen in the retail market over the past quarter," said Leupp, who added that high inventory expenses, falling margins and slowing demand had done "irreparable harm" to the company.

"We have experienced a significant slowdown in demand for our products, especially the Voodoo 3 and Voodoo 5 boards. This slowdown is consistent with the overall softness experienced by the PC market, especially in Western Europe.

"In addition, we've experienced pricing pressures in the channel. Finally, our inability to secure a bank line of credit has impacted our ability to build inventory to meet even the existing demand."

In October the graphics card maker warned that Q3 sales and earnings would be "substantially" lower than expected. At the time it blamed "overall softness in the European retail and system integrator channels." ®

Related Stories

Voodoo 4 or 3 cash dilemma
3dfx clarifies graphics card strategy
3dfx pulls plug on graphics card production
Blame Europe: Now it's 3dfx's turn
Nvidia to buy 3dfx?
3dfx on course to win Nvidia patent clash


Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022