Web sites! Banish those WinXP, IE6 smart tag blues!

Just tag all your pages. Doh...


Microsoft's smart tag technology can be shut off by web sites with a simple one line meta tag - which is the good news. The bad news is that it appears the tag will have to be added to everything you've already published, so it's a case of updating templates and crunching through the back catalogue.

The tag is:
<meta name="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="TRUE">

It's actually published here, way down the page, but as a number of desperate coders mailed us last week raging that they couldn't find instructions for shutting smart tags off, we suspect it may have been added recently.

But there are also a couple of interesting little snippets in the same section: "Most Smart Tags are added by Smart Tags you have downloaded to your computer. Some sites may not wish to have these Smart Tags show up on their Web pages. These sites can disable Smart Tags, so you may not see them everywhere on the Web."

The first part of that is of course not true right now, because practically the only smart tags in the wild, aside from the odd third party ones downloaded by the even odder crazy person, were installed on your computer by either Office XP or IE6. And if you downloaded OXP you're probably a very naughty boy. But the statement does indicate what Microsoft thinks ought to happen with smart tags - they're going to be great, they're going to rule the world, and all of you just won't be able to get enough of them.

The second part seems to us to suggest that sites who shut off smart tags are miserable control-freaks and spoilsports, but maybe we're being overly sensitive, and we should be kinder to our little friend the smart tag.

What about this though: "After adding this tag [the one above], any Smart Tags that the author has added to the page will continue to work, but Internet Explorer will not dynamically add new tags when users view the page."

If we read that right, then the ability to disable smart tags isn't a blanket disable, but a tool designed (at least partly) for the convenience of Microsoft's smart tag partners. Imagine two travel agents, both of them using smart tags for pretty much the same customer base, leaving much scope for confusion. So we get smart tag coding wars, and turf wars? And we also get the ability to sell third party site smart tagging capabilities as advertising.

You code in the shut off, then you also code in tagging specifically for people who've given you money to do so. Egad - this must have been part of the plan.

But if so, it maybe clashes with one of the other plans a tad. Smart tags as currently presented operate on two levels - the blunt instrument approach currently present in IE6 (later builds, but you can download them for 6 in general here), and the developer approach being pushed through OXP and Microsoft's partner programme.

From the user end (pretend you're convinced, for the moment) you'd use smart tags in order to get further information about subjects you were interested in whenever a company, a sports team or whatever was mentioned on a web site, any web site. Of course if the web site shut tagging off, it wouldn't work for you. So there's a clash.

From the developer/value add perspective, a smart tag supplier would be offering/selling specific tags which were intended to provide the user with specific benefits. Obviously, or the user wouldn't want them.

These tags would be supplied on the basis that the user trusted the supplier, and this is an important aspect of smart tagging. Smart tags, you see, need code running locally in order to work, and we know what code running locally does, don't we? Don't accept smart tags from strange people, children.

But that maybe gives us another clue as to the nature of the shut-off. If smart tags are operating solely as part of a trust relationship between customer and supplier, then that's largely up to the pair of them. Sure, The Register wouldn't get any money from the deal if you bought a smart tag that linked you to faked pictures of Bill Gates in compromising positions every time his name came up, but we'd probably be cool about that.

On the other hand, in what sense would it be possible to run just that smart tag, without being stuck with all of the ones Microsoft ships with IE6 as well? Locally, it's on or off, remotely control is site by site or even page by page. Manipulation beyond that presumably involves the editing of the smart tag data files on the local machine. How easy, one wonders, would it be to do that?

So has Microsoft confused the issue and messed up the rollout by greedily lobbing a big pile of Moneycentral smart tags into IE6? Maybe... ®

Related stories:
Have you been smart tagged? WinXP IE6 has a little list
Smart tagging in Office XP - what Melissa did next?


Other stories you might like

  • FTC urged to protect data privacy of women visiting abortion clinics
    As Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v Wade, safeguards on location info now more vital than ever

    Democrat senators have urged America's Federal Trade Commission to do something to protect the privacy of women after it emerged details of visits to abortion clinics were being sold by data brokers.

    Women's healthcare is an especially thorny issue right now after the Supreme Court voted in a leaked draft majority opinion to overturn Roe v Wade, a landmark ruling that declared women's rights to have an abortion are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

    If the nation's top judges indeed vote to strike down that 1973 decision, individual states, at least, can set their own laws governing women's reproductive rights. Thirteen states already have so-called "trigger laws" in place prohibiting abortions – mostly with exceptions in certain conditions, such as if the pregnancy or childbirth endangers the mother's life – that will go into effect if Roe v Wade is torn up. People living in those states would, in theory, have to travel to another state where abortion is legal to carry out the procedure lawfully, although laws are also planned to ban that.

    Continue reading
  • Zuckerberg sued for alleged role in Cambridge Analytica data-slurp scandal
    I can prove CEO was 'personally involved in Facebook’s failure to protect privacy', DC AG insists

    Cambridge Analytica is back to haunt Mark Zuckerberg: Washington DC's Attorney General filed a lawsuit today directly accusing the Meta CEO of personal involvement in the abuses that led to the data-slurping scandal. 

    DC AG Karl Racine filed [PDF] the civil suit on Monday morning, saying his office's investigations found ample evidence Zuck could be held responsible for that 2018 cluster-fsck. For those who've put it out of mind, UK-based Cambridge Analytica harvested tens of millions of people's info via a third-party Facebook app, revealing a – at best – somewhat slipshod handling of netizens' privacy by the US tech giant.

    That year, Racine sued Facebook, claiming the social network was well aware of the analytics firm's antics yet failed to do anything meaningful until the data harvesting was covered by mainstream media. Facebook repeatedly stymied document production attempts, Racine claimed, and the paperwork it eventually handed over painted a trail he said led directly to Zuck. 

    Continue reading
  • Florida's content-moderation law kept on ice, likely unconstitutional, court says
    So cool you're into free speech because that includes taking down misinformation

    While the US Supreme Court considers an emergency petition to reinstate a preliminary injunction against Texas' social media law HB 20, the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday partially upheld a similar injunction against Florida's social media law, SB 7072.

    Both Florida and Texas last year passed laws that impose content moderation restrictions, editorial disclosure obligations, and user-data access requirements on large online social networks. The Republican governors of both states justified the laws by claiming that social media sites have been trying to censor conservative voices, an allegation that has not been supported by evidence.

    Multiple studies addressing this issue say right-wing folk aren't being censored. They have found that social media sites try to take down or block misinformation, which researchers say is more common from right-leaning sources.

    Continue reading
  • US-APAC trade deal leaves out Taiwan, military defense not ruled out
    All fun and games until the chip factories are in the crosshairs

    US President Joe Biden has heralded an Indo-Pacific trade deal signed by several nations that do not include Taiwan. At the same time, Biden warned China that America would help defend Taiwan from attack; it is home to a critical slice of the global chip industry, after all. 

    The agreement, known as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is still in its infancy, with today's announcement enabling the United States and the other 12 participating countries to begin negotiating "rules of the road that ensure [US businesses] can compete in the Indo-Pacific," the White House said. 

    Along with America, other IPEF signatories are Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Combined, the White House said, the 13 countries participating in the IPEF make up 40 percent of the global economy. 

    Continue reading
  • 381,000-plus Kubernetes API servers 'exposed to internet'
    Firewall isn't a made-up word from the Hackers movie, people

    A large number of servers running the Kubernetes API have been left exposed to the internet, which is not great: they're potentially vulnerable to abuse.

    Nonprofit security organization The Shadowserver Foundation recently scanned 454,729 systems hosting the popular open-source platform for managing and orchestrating containers, finding that more than 381,645 – or about 84 percent – are accessible via the internet to varying degrees thus providing a cracked door into a corporate network.

    "While this does not mean that these instances are fully open or vulnerable to an attack, it is likely that this level of access was not intended and these instances are an unnecessarily exposed attack surface," Shadowserver's team stressed in a write-up. "They also allow for information leakage on version and build."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022