Now we are 6 – ‘other’ browser Opera reaches next milestone

More platforms than Elton John...

Our friends in the Norse released Opera 6 for Windows last week, hot on the heels of the technology preview of Opera 6 for Linux, and just a couple of weeks after the public beta of Opera 6 for Windows was released. In addition, Opera is at version 5 for the Mac, with two betas for Classic and Carbon currently in the works, 5.13 for Symbian, 5.2.1 for QNX, and 5.12 beta 1 for OS/2. And you can still get 3.62 for BeOS.

Nor is this by any means the entire list; aside from the implementations directly available from, the company has licensing deals with quite a number of hardware manufacturers and service providers. AMD, Ericsson and Canal+, for example.

On the Windows platform Opera remains a minority interest compared to IE, but the Symbian work in particular could produce nightmares for Redmond. Symbian is the OS of choice for most of the major mobile phone manufacturers, and Opera is the preferred browser for Symbian. This isn't a market anybody has a commanding lead in right now, because it's not yet much of a market, but once it's rolling it could be the little Norwegian company that has the commanding lead - and there's certainly some significance to Nokia's becoming the top PDA vendor in Europe in Q3.

In addition to this, the browser is becoming an important component to 'living without Microsoft' strategies, or for people trying to support heterogenous networks. You can run a standard browser for Windows (and it wouldn't be at all surprising if Opera's support for, say, NT, outlived Microsoft's), Linux and Mac, plus mobile clients. Microsoft can do Windows, Mac and mobile clients, but despite quantities of Redmond propaganda to the contrary, it does not currently look like it's winning the mobile client war. In addition, Opera doesn't bring the integration/.NET baggage with it, which could be helpful as being embraced by Windows becomes more and more an 'all or nothing' process.

Opera the company, meanwhile, seems to have a plausible strategy whereby it can survive, and possibly prosper. You do actually have to pay $39 for the browser if you don't want an advertisement in the button bar, but otherwise it's free, and the ad itself isn't what you'd call irritating. It also seems to identify your country of origin quite effectively, so presumably Opera is making at least some money out of the ads in the free versions. The multi-platform strategy is also revenue-related. Some of Opera's development is speculative/sentimental, but the QNX version for example derives from a Netvista-related deal with IBM earlier this year. Opera also has other development deals for embedded platforms, and presents itself as a neutral 'third force' for ISPs who're not related to AOL or Microsoft. Things like the decidedly non-commercial OS/2 development on the other hand move at a snail's pace - this sort of stuff is done mainly for love.

Opera version 6.0 has quite a few new features, but they're largely incremental, and the most important things about Opera are really more general. First of all, it's a multi-platform standards-based browser that supports 'proper' Java (unlike some recent efforts); second, it's highly configurable (and allowed you to manage cookies way before Microsoft thought it was a good idea), and third, it has become more generally acceptable over the past few years.

That last one takes a little explaining. In general, if you can't browse a site properly with Opera then it's almost certainly because the site is doing some dubious browser checking and/or is badly set up, rather than because Opera itself has a standards problem. Microsoft sites still do the dubious checking, but patchily - in most cases you can get to a page if you accept the occasional weirdness in the display, and only a few areas do the checking. For example, you can use Opera to go straight to the MSDN homepage (, but click on developer from the Microsoft front page and it'll go into the version checking loop, finally telling you you've got an unsupported browser.

This hasn't changed with the move from 5 to 6, and as is the case with every other browser that isn't IE, you can forget too. But in something like three years of using Opera I've got the impression that the number of serious sites you can't use Opera with has steadily declined. It's still useful to keep IE around for use when you really need to get in somewhere picky, but as you can't get IE out of more recent MS products anyway (yet), this isn't much of a hardship, and I'm finding less and less need to use it. With 6, finally, it looks like I can log into and do my shopping - not a major breakthrough for Opera, perhaps, but so long as I can actually buy the goods too (can't check until the freezer's empty), it's another reason for me not needing IE around.

Aside from the 'not Microsoft' factor, there are two specific features of Opera that make it particularly useful to me personally. In The Register's line of work you tend to have a lot of web pages open at the same time. It's difficult to keep track of these using IE, even with the slightly improved organisation of web pages available in WinXP. Opera corrals them all into a "Multiple Document Interface." That is, they're all stuck into a single Opera window on the desktop, providing you with a second visible bar where you can read the page titles easily. The ones that have updated since you last looked them are in blue, incidentally, so currently I know that E*Trade Stockwatch has changed. But as it updates every 60 seconds, this is not surprising.

With 6 Opera has introduced the option of using a Single Document Interface of the sort used by IE. From my point of view this isn't progress, but some other people may like it, and I can always ignore it. You can also now run multiple instances of Opera at the same time, which might turn out to be a useful way of organising MDI sessions (for example, I could use one for news gathering and one to organise the pile of wireless networking tech support pages I've been reading without much success for the past two weeks). On the other hand, this might turn out just to be confusing - I haven't decided yet.

The second of my two favourite Opera features is the ability to save your position, and to restart from the interruption point if the app or the machine crashes. If I've got 20-30 pages open, which is by no means unusual, then I'm going to be a deeply sad bunny if they all just vanish with a thud. This can happen with IE, and it can happen with monotonous regularity when Win2k decides not to suspend properly, but with Opera you can just carry on from where you were before. And you can keep a big pile of research material open all of the time, for weeks or months if you like, through crashes and shutdowns. This is such a killer feature I can't understand why Microsoft hasn't stolen it yet.

There are new bells and whistles in 6 that I'll probably never get around to finding, never mind using. There's an intriguing "hotclick" system whereby you can double click on a word in the browser window and have a menu of possible actions, such as dictionary, encyclopaedia and translate presented to you. You can check the lot of them out here, where you'll also find a lot of the features I never found/used in 5 either. But that's not really the point - Opera works for me, and slowly but surely, people are stopping calling me a cussed pervert for using it. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading
  • Conti: Russian-backed rulers of Costa Rican hacktocracy?
    Also, Chinese IT admin jailed for deleting database, and the NSA promises no more backdoors

    In brief The notorious Russian-aligned Conti ransomware gang has upped the ante in its attack against Costa Rica, threatening to overthrow the government if it doesn't pay a $20 million ransom. 

    Costa Rican president Rodrigo Chaves said that the country is effectively at war with the gang, who in April infiltrated the government's computer systems, gaining a foothold in 27 agencies at various government levels. The US State Department has offered a $15 million reward leading to the capture of Conti's leaders, who it said have made more than $150 million from 1,000+ victims.

    Conti claimed this week that it has insiders in the Costa Rican government, the AP reported, warning that "We are determined to overthrow the government by means of a cyber attack, we have already shown you all the strength and power, you have introduced an emergency." 

    Continue reading
  • China-linked Twisted Panda caught spying on Russian defense R&D
    Because Beijing isn't above covert ops to accomplish its five-year goals

    Chinese cyberspies targeted two Russian defense institutes and possibly another research facility in Belarus, according to Check Point Research.

    The new campaign, dubbed Twisted Panda, is part of a larger, state-sponsored espionage operation that has been ongoing for several months, if not nearly a year, according to the security shop.

    In a technical analysis, the researchers detail the various malicious stages and payloads of the campaign that used sanctions-related phishing emails to attack Russian entities, which are part of the state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec Corporation.

    Continue reading
  • FTC signals crackdown on ed-tech harvesting kid's data
    Trade watchdog, and President, reminds that COPPA can ban ya

    The US Federal Trade Commission on Thursday said it intends to take action against educational technology companies that unlawfully collect data from children using online educational services.

    In a policy statement, the agency said, "Children should not have to needlessly hand over their data and forfeit their privacy in order to do their schoolwork or participate in remote learning, especially given the wide and increasing adoption of ed tech tools."

    The agency says it will scrutinize educational service providers to ensure that they are meeting their legal obligations under COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

    Continue reading
  • Mysterious firm seeks to buy majority stake in Arm China
    Chinese joint venture's ousted CEO tries to hang on - who will get control?

    The saga surrounding Arm's joint venture in China just took another intriguing turn: a mysterious firm named Lotcap Group claims it has signed a letter of intent to buy a 51 percent stake in Arm China from existing investors in the country.

    In a Chinese-language press release posted Wednesday, Lotcap said it has formed a subsidiary, Lotcap Fund, to buy a majority stake in the joint venture. However, reporting by one newspaper suggested that the investment firm still needs the approval of one significant investor to gain 51 percent control of Arm China.

    The development comes a couple of weeks after Arm China said that its former CEO, Allen Wu, was refusing once again to step down from his position, despite the company's board voting in late April to replace Wu with two co-chief executives. SoftBank Group, which owns 49 percent of the Chinese venture, has been trying to unentangle Arm China from Wu as the Japanese tech investment giant plans for an initial public offering of the British parent company.

    Continue reading
  • SmartNICs power the cloud, are enterprise datacenters next?
    High pricing, lack of software make smartNICs a tough sell, despite offload potential

    SmartNICs have the potential to accelerate enterprise workloads, but don't expect to see them bring hyperscale-class efficiency to most datacenters anytime soon, ZK Research's Zeus Kerravala told The Register.

    SmartNICs are widely deployed in cloud and hyperscale datacenters as a means to offload input/output (I/O) intensive network, security, and storage operations from the CPU, freeing it up to run revenue generating tenant workloads. Some more advanced chips even offload the hypervisor to further separate the infrastructure management layer from the rest of the server.

    Despite relative success in the cloud and a flurry of innovation from the still-limited vendor SmartNIC ecosystem, including Mellanox (Nvidia), Intel, Marvell, and Xilinx (AMD), Kerravala argues that the use cases for enterprise datacenters are unlikely to resemble those of the major hyperscalers, at least in the near term.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022