PDAs cost loadsamoney

Big Biz TCO thing


Gartner, the IT analyst firm, makes something of a speciality of estimating the total cost of ownership (TCO) of computer hardware for its corporate customers. You know the sort of stuff - the purchase price of a desktop PC is only 12 per cent of its TCO; it costs up to $150 to dispose a PC safely and legally etcetera.

Now it's working the slide rule for the latest executive must-have the PDA, and gloomy reading it makes too for Big Business.

For PDAs can cost corporates as much as $3,000 per user per year. That's right - three thousand bucks. And PDAs with wireless modems can add another $1,400 or so in additional hardware, support and service fees. Looks like 3G phones won't be so expensive, after all? Not really, the costs include recurring service charges for wireless connectivity, just like phone bills.

Service charges are the biggest component on wireless WAN TCO capital costs, according to Gartner which recommends "consolidating network service providers, bundling services and aggressively negotiating contracts are best practices to reduce overall TCO".

You want a breakdown of Gartner's estimates? Here goes: for an integrated wireless PDA, 60 per cent of the cost is soaked up by capital (hardware, software and network services; 30 per cent goes into the corporate operations maw (tech services and support, peer support, application management and development); and 10 per cent to administration (including evaluation, implementation and training).

Gartner preaches what it calls a TBO - or Total Benefit of Ownership - argument, when assessing whether or not to kit out staff with PDAs.

Return on investment is possible for many mobile applications," it says. But "enterprises that proactively link mobile technology investments to job functions and bottom-line productivity indicators, such as sales revenue, customer support an internal operations goals, will be successful at defining a mobile ROI, as long as TCO is also understood."

That sounds like a big but to us. Can't we just keep our laptops and mobile phones? ®

Gartner press release

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Cuba ransomware gang scores almost $44m in ransom payments across 49 orgs, say Feds

    Hancitor is at play

    The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) says 49 organisations, including some in government, were hit by Cuba ransomware as of early November this year.

    The attacks were spread across five "critical infrastructure", which, besides government, included the financial, healthcare, manufacturing, and – as you'd expect – IT sectors. The Feds said late last week the threat actors are demanding $76m in ransoms and have already received at least $43.9m in payments.

    The ransomware gang's loader of choice, Hancitor, was the culprit, distributed via phishing emails, or via exploit of Microsoft Exchange vulnerabilities, compromised credentials, or Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) tools. Hancitor – also known as Chanitor or Tordal –  enables a CobaltStrike beacon as a service on the victim's network using a legitimate Windows service like PowerShell.

    Continue reading
  • Graviton 3: AWS attempts to gain silicon advantage with latest custom hardware

    Key to faster, more predictable cloud

    RE:INVENT AWS had a conviction that "modern processors were not well optimized for modern workloads," the cloud corp's senior veep of Infrastructure, Peter DeSantis, claimed at its latest annual Re:invent gathering in Las Vegas.

    DeSantis was speaking last week about AWS's Graviton 3 Arm-based processor, providing a bit more meat around the bones, so to speak – and in his comment the word "modern" is doing a lot of work.

    The computing landscape looks different from the perspective of a hyperscale cloud provider; what counts is not flexibility but intensive optimization and predictable performance.

    Continue reading
  • The Omicron dilemma: Google goes first on delaying office work

    Hurrah, employees can continue to work from home and take calls in pyjamas

    Googlers can continue working from home and will no longer be required to return to campuses on 10 January 2022 as previously expected.

    The decision marks another delay in getting more employees back to their desks. For Big Tech companies, setting a firm return date during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a nightmare. All attempts were pushed back so far due to rising numbers of cases or new variants of the respiratory disease spreading around the world, such as the new Omicron strain.

    Google's VP of global security, Chris Rackow, broke the news to staff in a company-wide email, first reported by CNBC. He said Google would wait until the New Year to figure out when campuses in the US can safely reopen for a mandatory return.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021