Apple Israel chief calls for ‘Save Hebrew’ write-in

Spells "Noicreoc", if you're reading from right to left

Itzik Radishkovitz, CEO of Apple's Israel representative Yeda, called for a worldwide user campaign to pressure Microsoft to add localization support for Hebrew in its Mac products, in an interview with The Register today.

As we reported earlier this week, Microsoft refuses to support Hebrew, Arabic, and Korean languages in Macintosh versions of its Office suite, or its Internet Explorer browser, obliging institutional buyers in these markets to opt for Windows instead.

Radishkovitz said that Yeda had first approached Microsoft in 1998 to add Hebrew support for the Mac. After several rebuffs, Yeda offered to pay for the cost of localization:

"'Just tell us how much will it cost us', we asked. 'How much money do you want - because we are ready to pay!'" he said. But Microsoft Israel refused to listen.

"We are very dependent on this - because you can't sell into large institutions, academic institutions, without Office."

"Even in the United States and Canada there are a lot of Jewish communities, and people who would be happy to use Office in Hebrew."

Many educational institutions with a strong Macintosh tradition are being obliged to turn to Windows, he added.

And he called for users communities - both Jewish and Arabic - to pressure Microsoft to add support on the Macintosh platform.

Sounds pretty straightforward, doesn't it? But so far neither Apple US nor Microsoft has provided with us an adequate answer.

Apple referred us to Microsoft, and despite several calls to Microsoft's PR agency Waggoner Edstrom Strategic Communications (as it bills itself) , we've been unable to speak to a Microsoft Macintosh Business Unit representative directly. Instead we got a PR who offered much conjecture - and told us that although she couldn't say for sure, the lack of localization was probably because it didn't make sense for Microsoft as a business decision.

Yes, yes - we said. We know that. But what about the counter offer by Yeda - to underwrite the Hebrew localization itself? She didn't know. We waited, and waited, and still didn't hear anything.

Then on Monday, after we published the story, we got a vinegary voice mail (and accompanying email) from the WaggEd bunny complaining that she'd been misquoted. Actually we reported her comments faithfully - and as of the time of writing, we still haven't been able to speak to a Microsoft Mac BU staffer. This we pointed out, was hardly "strategic" - and barely even amounts to "communication".

We ought to point out that we've been dealing with WaggEd for years - and they're usually extremely conscientious. When Microsoft feels a story is significant, they call us back right away. For example our revelation about Passport's onerous Terms and Conditions, prompted a huge public backlash, and as soon as Microsoft rewrote the terms, it made sure we were the first to know.

By contrast Hebrew localization just doesn't seem to be a PR priority - although outside the United States it's viewed as a prime concern by AntiTrust regulators. Microsoft's snub to Hebrew writers has already prompted a complaint to the Israeli government. And remember - it's not just Hebrew writers, this affects all right to left languages, and even Cyrillic writers, who find themselves being herded into the Windows monoculture by Microsoft's failure to support the Macintosh platform.

The Register has a mere 250,000 readers every day - a small number for a giant IT company to consider, but perhaps there are enough to be a nuisance. We won't let this fascinating story disappear, for sure.

So tell us of your experience of demanding a reply from Microsoft or Apple, and we'll share them here. ®

Related Story

Microsoft's Mac Hebrew snub prompts Israeli AntiTrust complaint

Other stories you might like

  • Drone ship carrying yet more drones launches in China
    Zhuhai Cloud will carry 50 flying and diving machines it can control with minimal human assistance

    Chinese academics have christened an ocean research vessel that has a twist: it will sail the seas with a complement of aerial and ocean-going drones and no human crew.

    The Zhu Hai Yun, or Zhuhai Cloud, launched in Guangzhou after a year of construction. The 290-foot-long mothership can hit a top speed of 18 knots (about 20 miles per hour) and will carry 50 flying, surface, and submersible drones that launch and self-recover autonomously. 

    According to this blurb from the shipbuilder behind its construction, the Cloud will also be equipped with a variety of additional observational instruments "which can be deployed in batches in the target sea area, and carry out task-oriented adaptive networking to achieve three-dimensional view of specific targets." Most of the ship is an open deck where flying drones can land and be stored. The ship is also equipped with launch and recovery equipment for its aquatic craft. 

    Continue reading
  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022