Gates gives China peeking rights at Windows source

It'll be on ISOnews next...


Explaining Microsoft's Government Security Program a while back Craig Mundie intimated that it applied to practically everybody except Cuba and Iraq, and he even gave China as an example of a qualifying country. So Bill Gates goes to China and it's not exactly a surprise that Chinese participation in the GSP is announced. Hey, it's free, so why wouldn't they?

Microsoft has already had a couple of bites of the 'India signs up for GSP' story, although that one hasn't quite happened yet. But next trip, trust us. Where, however, is the beef this trip?

Aside from providing Bill with a handy auto-announcement which can be used on his travels, giving governments looking rights to Microsoft source code has other advantages. As we sourly noted earlier, the process of looking will tend to draw governments into the Microsoft kirk, and if they had previously been digging around on a freelance basis (not of course that we'd suggest China would do such a thing), then it's useful to Microsoft to have such activities to some extent 'officialised' and controlled.

We note that Dr. Wu ShiZhong, Director of the China Information Technology Security Certification Center (CNITSEC), himself comments that: "Microsoft's GSP provides us with the controlled access to source code and technical information in an appropriate way." Which is more what you'd expect the Microsoft rep to say while explaining why the company was giving China source access.

Microsoft's own explanation of the GSP makes it clear it has restrictions, although it's bashful about what they are, and it also makes it clear that it is intended to provide a jumping-off point for wider co-operation:

"The Government Security Program...is a no-fee initiative that provides program participants the ability to review Windows source code using a smart-card-based secure online access and subject to certain license restrictions. [which are?]... In addition to source access, the GSP provides for the disclosure of technical information about the Windows platform, enhancing governments? ability to build and deploy computing infrastructures with strong security technologies in place. The program also promotes increased communication and collaboration between Microsoft security professionals and program participants, providing opportunities to visit Microsoft development facilities in Redmond, Wash.; review various aspects of Windows source-code development, testing and deployment processes; discuss existing and potential projects with Microsoft security experts, and generally interact with and provide feedback directly to Microsoft staff."

You can almost see the colour brochure. We do not expect Chinese IT people to be wildly impressed by being able to hang out with the cool geeks in Redmond - not anything like as impressed by the weaker-willed ones at UK.gov, anyway. But you can see the objective, and see how Microsoft might think it can profit handsomely from the "no-fee initiative." ®

What else Bill did in China

Beijing signs MS deal with Gates, Linux deal with IBM


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021