Critics turn a deaf ear to Blair's ‘Big Conversation’

More Monologue than dialogue


Labour Party plans to consult the country about issues and problems it would like the government to address have received a frosty initial reception.

Launching the "Big Conversation" initiative in a visit to Newport, South Wales last Friday, Tony Blair said he wanted to engage the British public in shaping Labour Party policy going into the next election.

Britons can express their opinions after registering on the Big ConversationWeb site or by texting their top priority to 84402 (each text costs 25p in addition to normal text charges). Voters can also have their say by email, via post or in face to face meetings with local politicians.

The results of the initiative will be taken into account in developing Labour's manifesto and in defining policy priorities both locally or nationally. Whatever the results of the consultation, politicians will still have the final say on policy formation.

Tony Blair said the Labour Party was launching the consultation now because after six years in power the government has reached a "fork in the road".

Spin cycle

Critics have wasted no time dismissing the scheme as a gimmick or proof that the government have run out of ideas.

National newspapers are deeply sceptical about the whole idea. The Conservative leaning Daily Telegraph describes the idea as a political fix with party officials "handpicking contributors and editing out their negative comments".

Labour grandee Roy Hattersley, writing in The Guardian describes the idea as a "confidence trick in a good cause". The Guardian's line, reflected in Hattersley's column, and in other editorials is that the whole exercise is not really a conversation but more a monologue designed to persuade voters that New Labour is taking the country in the correct direction.

The Independent concurs.

Only the Labour-supporting Daily Mirror comes close to praising the latest policy initiative from a listening Prime Minister.

Brickbats

Opposition politicians describe the whole exercise as bogus.

Matthew Taylor MP, Liberal Democrat Party Chair, said: "Labour have been ignoring people for years now. This simply makes it official. Email your views, but everyone knows that from foundation hospitals to war in Iraq and tuition fees, Labour doesn't listen.

"Tony Blair has already said there's no reverse gear, so how can he respond to what he hears?"

Co-chairman of the Conservative Party, Dr Liam Fox MP, said, "Voters don't want a conversation with Tony Blair they want an explanation from him, they want to know why their taxes have gone up and why they have not had the delivery on health, education, pensions or transport that they were promised."

"This is another example of the Government trying to detract attention from their failures," he added.

Anticipating these criticisms, Tony Blair predicted that even though "cynics will sneer" the Big Conversation provides a way for voters to take part in an "honest, serious debate about the future" of Britain. ®

13 questions in the Big Conversation

How do we build on economic stability?
How do we do more to tackle poverty and inequality?
How do we lead healthier lives?
How do we make our communities safe?
How do we give every child an excellent education?
How do we balance work and family life?
How do we ensure security and well-being in older age?
How do we provide a modern transport network?
How do we create a fair asylum and immigration system that benefits Britain?
How do we safeguard our environment for future generations?
How do we do more to connect politics and people?
How do we make Britain stronger in Europe?
How do we develop our concept of international community?

External Links

The Big Conversation


Other stories you might like

  • EU-US Trade and Technology Council meets to coordinate on supply chains
    Agenda includes warning system for disruptions, and avoiding 'subsidy race' for chip investments

    The EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) is meeting in Paris today to discuss coordinated approaches to global supply chain issues.

    This is only the second meeting of the TTC, the agenda for which was prepared in February. That highlighted a number of priorities, including securing supply chains, technological cooperation, the coordination of measures to combat distorting practices, and approaches to the decarbonization of trade.

    According to a White House pre-briefing for US reporters, the EU and US are set to announce joint approaches on technical discussions to international standard-setting bodies, an early warning system to better predict and address potential semiconductor supply chain disruptions, and a transatlantic approach to semiconductor investments aimed at ensuring security of supply.

    Continue reading
  • US cops kick back against facial recognition bans
    Plus: DeepMind launches new generalist AI system, and Apple boffin quits over return-to-work policy

    In brief Facial recognition bans passed by US cities are being overturned as law enforcement and lobbyist groups pressure local governments to tackle rising crime rates.

    In July, the state of Virginia will scrap its ban on the controversial technology after less than a year. California and New Orleans may follow suit, Reuters first reported. Vermont adjusted its bill to allow police to use facial recognition software in child sex abuse investigations.

    Elsewhere, efforts are under way in New York, Colorado, and Indiana to prevent bills banning facial recognition from passing. It's not clear if some existing vetoes set to expire, like the one in California, will be renewed. Around two dozen US state or local governments passed laws prohibiting facial recognition from 2019 to 2021. Police, however, believe the tool is useful in identifying suspects and can help solve cases especially in places where crime rates have risen.

    Continue reading
  • RISC-V needs more than an open architecture to compete
    Arm shows us that even total domination doesn't always make stupid levels of money

    Opinion Interviews with chip company CEOs are invariably enlightening. On top of the usual market-related subjects of success and failure, revenues and competition, plans and pitfalls, the highly paid victim knows that there's a large audience of unusually competent critics eager for technical details. That's you.

    Take The Register's latest interview with RISC-V International CEO Calista Redmond. It moved smartly through the gears on Intel's recent Platinum Membership of the open ISA consortium ("they're not too worried about their x86 business"), the interest from autocratic regimes (roughly "there are no rules, if some come up we'll stick by them"), and what RISC-V's 2022 will look like. Laptops. Thousand-core AI chips. Google hyperscalers. Edge. The plan seems to be to do in five years what took Arm 20.

    RISC-V may not be an existential risk to Intel, but Arm had better watch it.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022