Microsoft ‘takes hard drive out’ of Xbox 2

Flash supplier spills the beans

Microsoft's tie-in with Flash memory specialist M-Systems has led some observers to conclude that the software giant plans to ship its upcoming Xbox 2 console without a hard drive.

Well, that is indeed the case, if comments from M-Systems' CEO, Dov Moran, are anything to go by. Interviewed this week by Israeli business paper Globes, he said:

"Microsoft has taken the hard disk out of its Xbox. The only thing left will be a CD - that's all. At some point, when users want to save their email messages, copy music, or anything like that, the only storage they'll have is what we give them."

It's worth pointing out that this doesn't imply that the Xbox 2's hard drive will be replaced with Flash.

Moran also confirmed that Microsoft will begin manufacturing the console next year. "We'll start supply only in 2005," he said. The supply deal is worth hundreds of millions to M-Systems, He added, "spread over a few years, and we'll be the main supplier for it; and I hope the sole supplier."

If his claim correctly reflects Microsoft's Xbox 2 plan, it suggests the company wants to adopt a more console-like approach (as Xbox Next/Xbox 2 speculation has mooted previously).

It is often suggested, for example, that Xbox 2 will be a broader home entertainment system than its predecessor, providing Media Center PC-style functionality as well as gaming. The snag with this idea is that such functionality is already provided by... well, Media Center PCs, for a start. While Microsoft may want to pitch such a version of Xbox at PC-free households, any family sufficiently interested in buying such a console will almost have a PC in any case, and thus be better pitch for a higher-margin Media Center PC.

We can imagine Microsoft expanding Xbox's capabilities this way, but more as a PSX-like update to the current Xbox than the next generation of the console.

The current Xbox has a hard drive because it's essentially a PC. That's the case partly because Microsoft is wedded to the platform, but mostly because it was the cheapest way of entering the market. Using broadly off-the-shelf parts is less expensive than developing hardware from scratch. Software development is likewise less costly because it derives from a well-established platform. Much better to test the market as cheaply as possible and, if the foray proves successful, design future generations from the ground up, choosing hardware best-suited to the application in hand.

Hence the use of a non-x86 processor, IBM's 64-bit PowerPC 970 family, and the decision to drop the largely unnecessary - for most users - hard drive. Microsoft is confident that it has enough market share to bring games developers with it. And while the hardware may change radically, the software APIs almost certainly will stay the same.

This all points to a console that (like almost all of those before it) is built from the bottom up to deliver a powerful gaming experience, and not to a general-purpose personal computing device. ®

Related Stories

Xbox 2 to sport three 64-bit IBM chips, ATI R500
Microsoft wants non-standard media for Xbox 2?
Xbox 2 to get 65nm CPU
First 65nm IBM PowerPC chip to be dual-core
IBM fabs 90nm G5 using strained silicon
Microsoft picks IBM as Xbox 2 processor partner
Microsoft looks to SiS for Xbox 2 I/O chips
ATI confirms Xbox 2 win
Nintendo to ship GameCube 2 in '2005-6' - official

Other stories you might like

  • Employers in denial over success of digital skills training, say exasperated staffers

    Large disparities in views from bosses vs workers on 'talent transformation initiatives,' says survey

    Digital transformation projects are being held back by a lack of skills, according to a new survey, which finds that while many employers believe they are doing well at training up existing staff to meet the requirements, their employees beg to differ.

    Skills shortages are nothing new, but the Talent Transformation Global Impact report from research firm Ipsos on behalf of online learning provider Udacity indicates that although digital transformation initiatives are stalling due to a lack of digital talent, enterprises are becoming increasingly out of touch with what their employees need to fill the skills gap.

    The report is the result of two surveys taking in over 2,000 managers and more than 4,000 employees across the US, UK, France, and Germany. It found that 59 per cent of employers state that not having enough skilled employees is having a major or moderate impact on their business.

    Continue reading
  • Saved by the Bill: What if... Microsoft had killed Windows 95?

    Now this looks like a job for me, 'cos we need a little, controversy... 'Cos it feels so NT, without me

    Former Microsoft veep Brad Silverberg has paid tribute to Bill Gates for saving Windows 95.

    Silverberg posted his comment in a Twitter exchange started by Fast co-founder Allison Barr Allen regarding somebody who'd changed your life. Silverberg responded "Bill Gates" and, in response to a question from Microsoft cybersecurity pro Ashanka Iddya, explained Gates's role in Windows 95's survival.

    Continue reading
  • UK government opens consultation on medic-style register for Brit infosec pros

    Are you competent? Ethical? Welcome to UKCSC's new list

    Frustrated at lack of activity from the "standard setting" UK Cyber Security Council, the government wants to pass new laws making it into the statutory regulator of the UK infosec trade.

    Government plans, quietly announced in a consultation document issued last week, include a formal register of infosec practitioners – meaning security specialists could be struck off or barred from working if they don't meet "competence and ethical requirements."

    The proposed setup sounds very similar to the General Medical Council and its register of doctors allowed to practice medicine in the UK.

    Continue reading
  • Microsoft's do-it-all IDE Visual Studio 2022 came out late last year. How good is it really?

    Top request from devs? A Linux version

    Review Visual Studio goes back a long way. Microsoft always had its own programming languages and tools, beginning with Microsoft Basic in 1975 and Microsoft C 1.0 in 1983.

    The Visual Studio idea came from two main sources. In the early days, Windows applications were coded and compiled using MS-DOS, and there was a MS-DOS IDE called Programmer's Workbench (PWB, first released 1989). The company also came up Visual Basic (VB, first released 1991), which unlike Microsoft C++ had a Windows IDE. Perhaps inspired by VB, Microsoft delivered Visual C++ 1.0 in 1993, replacing the little-used PWB. Visual Studio itself was introduced in 1997, though it was more of a bundle of different Windows development tools initially. The first Visual Studio to integrate C++ and Visual Basic (in .NET guise) development into the same IDE was Visual Studio .NET in 2002, 20 years ago, and this perhaps is the true ancestor of today's IDE.

    A big change in VS 2022, released November, is that it is the first version where the IDE itself runs as a 64-bit process. The advantage is that it has access to more than 4GB memory in the devenv process, this being the shell of the IDE, though of course it is still possible to compile 32-bit applications. The main benefit is for large solutions comprising hundreds of projects. Although a substantial change, it is transparent to developers and from what we can tell, has been a beneficial change.

    Continue reading
  • James Webb Space Telescope has arrived at its new home – an orbit almost a million miles from Earth

    Funnily enough, that's where we want to be right now, too

    The James Webb Space Telescope, the largest and most complex space observatory built by NASA, has reached its final destination: L2, the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point, an orbit located about a million miles away.

    Mission control sent instructions to fire the telescope's thrusters at 1400 EST (1900 UTC) on Monday. The small boost increased its speed by about 3.6 miles per hour to send it to L2, where it will orbit the Sun in line with Earth for the foreseeable future. It takes about 180 days to complete an L2 orbit, Amber Straughn, deputy project scientist for Webb Science Communications at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, said during a live briefing.

    "Webb, welcome home!" blurted NASA's Administrator Bill Nelson. "Congratulations to the team for all of their hard work ensuring Webb's safe arrival at L2 today. We're one step closer to uncovering the mysteries of the universe. And I can't wait to see Webb's first new views of the universe this summer."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022