Guardian Unlimited introduces registration

Media section sign-up 'not prelude to charging'

The Guardian’s website has moved further towards its more commercial competitors with the news that, from today, readers will have to register before they can access stories in its Media section.

The registration page has been kept as simple and short as possible - just seven pop-down questions - and Guardian Unlimited’s editor-in-chief Emily Bell assured us that the reason for the move was to keep the content free. But nevertheless, the step marks a further shift in The Guardian’s online approach toward that of its rivals which charge for large sections of their content and restrict access to large parts of their sites.

Emily Bell stressed that the change was flagged up in July when The Guardian also introduced a number of other paid-for services. Strangely, she makes no mention of registration in her letter of the time. It does, however, mention that it will charge for the daily Media Guardian email. That will happen soon, Bell told us. This week, The Guardian also started charging for its (excellent) Digital Editions.

What does all this mean? Bell warns us not to read too much into the financial situation surrounding The Guardian’s online offering. "It would be nice to make money than it costs and becoming profitable is one of the ultimate goals," she told us, "but there are other aims, like reaching as wide an audience as possible."

The registration is purely advertising department-led. As Bell readily admits, they don’t know for certain who the Media Guardian readers are ("It could be 50 per cent students for all we know"). Anyone who has ever run a website will sympathise. But a careful look at the registration page reveals that a bias toward advertising and media buyer types. Why? Because they are the people that advertisers want and The Guardian wants to know about.

Bell happily admits that providing more information about readers to advertisers (although The Guardian does maintain a good privacy policy) means more money and she says the registration will mean that she can "hold out against charging" for the actual content.

None of this should come as a particular surprise though. The issues faced by The Guardian now are precisely those faced by everyone else (except the BBC) two years ago. It’s just that due to The Guardian’s unique ownership structure, it hasn’t been under the same commercial pressures from owners and stockholders. This has held it in good stead. As others have had to introduce controls and charging, The Guardian has stormed out ahead on the online stakes and now sits comfortably at the front of the UK media - except, of course, for the BBC.

It is only inevitable then that with such a large lead on its competitors, the company would start trying to recoup some of the money invested over the past few years. Hence the new services - primed for charging - and registration.

Why the Media section? Because, as with the Monday media supplement in the printed edition, it has become the main stopping-off post for the UK media industry. Bell also says she hopes that with media people tending to be very savvy about such things as registration and content charging and the like, it won’t bother them as much as other groups to fill in a form to get access to free content.

She does remain a little nervous about the effect the registration may have on readers though. "It is an experiment. If we find we’re losing a lot of traffic and that isn’t coming through on ad revenues, we will take it off again."

So, the wonderful free gambol in the pastures is over and The Guardian is now having to share the cowshed with everybody else; even the BBC will find itself lassoed by the government sooner or later. Bell tells us that the registration will also help improve the site as they’ll have more idea of who is reading it, but this really is no more than the sugar to help the advertising medicine go down.

Of course, the move will also delight The Guardian’s competitors, who now have far more chance of regaining some of the market. And it is one more step toward the Holy Grail for online publishers - wide acceptance of paid-for content. ®

Related links
Registering explanation/announcement
First set of paid-for services explanation/announcement (July 2003)

Related stories
Guardian’s digital edition raises stakes
This is the future of online newspapers

Other stories you might like

  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading
  • Cloud security unicorn cuts 20% of staff after raising $1.3b
    Time to play blame bingo: Markets? Profits? Too much growth? Russia? Space aliens?

    Cloud security company Lacework has laid off 20 percent of its employees, just months after two record-breaking funding rounds pushed its valuation to $8.3 billion.

    A spokesperson wouldn't confirm the total number of employees affected, though told The Register that the "widely speculated number on Twitter is a significant overestimate."

    The company, as of March, counted more than 1,000 employees, which would push the jobs lost above 200. And the widely reported number on Twitter is about 300 employees. The biz, based in Silicon Valley, was founded in 2015.

    Continue reading
  • Talos names eight deadly sins in widely used industrial software
    Entire swaths of gear relies on vulnerability-laden Open Automation Software (OAS)

    A researcher at Cisco's Talos threat intelligence team found eight vulnerabilities in the Open Automation Software (OAS) platform that, if exploited, could enable a bad actor to access a device and run code on a targeted system.

    The OAS platform is widely used by a range of industrial enterprises, essentially facilitating the transfer of data within an IT environment between hardware and software and playing a central role in organizations' industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) efforts. It touches a range of devices, including PLCs and OPCs and IoT devices, as well as custom applications and APIs, databases and edge systems.

    Companies like Volvo, General Dynamics, JBT Aerotech and wind-turbine maker AES are among the users of the OAS platform.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022