Music biz appeals Canada file sharing-is-legal ruling

Music to lawyers' ears


As expected, the decision by a Canadian Appeals Court, to refuse legal help in identifying file sharers which appear to be swapping copyrighted works, is being challenged by the Canadian Recording Industry Association. The CRIA filed an appeal last week.

The decision flies in the face of US courts, which although they have resisted a shortcut method for identifying alleged illegal file sharers, have backed the idea that people swapping copyrighted works are breaking the law. The RIAA, America's equivalent of the CRIA, has now taken over 2,000 people to court for file swapping offences, in most cases settling out of court for a fine.

European countries have just begun the same style of copyright actions against file sharers as the US under fresh copyright laws that have been inspired by the US Digital Millenium Copyright Act and pushed through by a US-dominated World Intellectual Property Organization.

The Canadian court said that it couldn't force ISPs to reveal the identity of its clients since what they were doing wasn't against Canadian law, as it was seen as copying for personal use. The CRIA view is that Canada has copyright law, and that law shouldn't allow people to make copies of hundreds or thousands of copyrighted songs and to put them out on the Internet for copying and global distribution.

The CRIA appeal notice suggested that the judge had overreached himself, made errors in law, and errors in his assessment of the facts. Stern stuff, not designed to endear the claimants to the judge.

The ISPs in question, Bell Canada, Shaw Communications, Telus Communications, Rogers Cable and Videotron need to have court orders before handing over personal information, or they themselves would be liable to prosecution under Canadian privacy laws.

The judgment came at the end of March and affected the first 29 file sharing uploaders which are claimed to illegally be posting hundreds of songs on the web. The judge compared the action to a photocopy machine in a library, saying he could not see a real difference between a library that places a photocopy machine in a room full of copyrighted material and a computer user that places a personal copy on a shared directory linked to a P2P service. A date for the appeal has not yet been set.

© Copyright 2004 Faultline

Faultline is published by Rethink Research, a London-based publishing and consulting firm. This weekly newsletter is an assessment of the impact of events that have happened each week in the world of digital media. Faultline is where media meets technology. Subscription details here.

Related stories

Triple setback for music giants' global jihad
File sharers not guilty of copyright infringement - Canadian judge
Music biz takes P2P jihad to Europe and Canada
War on Culture's victims face Penitentiary Blues
Kazaa and co not cause of music biz woes , say Profs
UK, Oz album sales rise despite Kazaa crisis


Other stories you might like

  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading
  • Cloud security unicorn cuts 20% of staff after raising $1.3b
    Time to play blame bingo: Markets? Profits? Too much growth? Russia? Space aliens?

    Cloud security company Lacework has laid off 20 percent of its employees, just months after two record-breaking funding rounds pushed its valuation to $8.3 billion.

    A spokesperson wouldn't confirm the total number of employees affected, though told The Register that the "widely speculated number on Twitter is a significant overestimate."

    The company, as of March, counted more than 1,000 employees, which would push the jobs lost above 200. And the widely reported number on Twitter is about 300 employees. The biz, based in Silicon Valley, was founded in 2015.

    Continue reading
  • Talos names eight deadly sins in widely used industrial software
    Entire swaths of gear relies on vulnerability-laden Open Automation Software (OAS)

    A researcher at Cisco's Talos threat intelligence team found eight vulnerabilities in the Open Automation Software (OAS) platform that, if exploited, could enable a bad actor to access a device and run code on a targeted system.

    The OAS platform is widely used by a range of industrial enterprises, essentially facilitating the transfer of data within an IT environment between hardware and software and playing a central role in organizations' industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) efforts. It touches a range of devices, including PLCs and OPCs and IoT devices, as well as custom applications and APIs, databases and edge systems.

    Companies like Volvo, General Dynamics, JBT Aerotech and wind-turbine maker AES are among the users of the OAS platform.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022