Intel's CEO gets blunt about poor execution

Shape up . . . or else


Intel's CEO Craig Barrett has chastised workers, in a memo sent last week, for an unacceptable string of delays and manufacturing problems that threaten to undermine the company's position as the leading chip manufacturer.

In an uncharacteristic move, Barrett chided all 80,000 Intel staffers for issues such as the Grantsdale chipset recall and delays with Intel's mobile processor line. Some analysts have suggested that as chipmakers deal with more complex manufacturing processes, they could start to see a greater influx of problems creep up. Barrett, however, placed blame for the snafus right on Intel's managers and urged them to improve . . . or else.

I recently spoke to Intel’s senior managers about our execution. Yes, I spoke bluntly and directly, because to me there is nothing more essential to Intel’s success than its culture of Operational Excellence and our performance to values such as Discipline, Results Orientation, and Customer Orientation. I spoke bluntly also because it is part of our culture to address our problems with honesty and to resolve to fix them. Our business is complex and we have set high expectations for ourselves. Therefore it is critical that everyone – beginning with senior management, but extending to all of you – focus intensely on actions and attitudes that will continue Intel’s strong track record of technology leadership leading to outstanding company performance and satisfied customers. Finally, I was direct because I wanted senior managers—whose job it is to set expectations to all of you and to provide direction and coaching—to have no doubt about the need to improve our performance.

There are many reasons for these (product delays and manufacturing issues), but in the end the reasons don’t matter because the result is less-satisfied customers and a less-successful Intel. I believe, as you do, that this is not the Intel we all know and that it is not acceptable.

(Sadly, we had to find out about this note from a Reuters reporter. Shame on you, readers. Where is the love?)

So what exactly is Intel going to do to fix the problems? Well, the company expects to keep a closer eye on manufacturing teams and to set up a series of checks to make sure teams are meeting deadlines and that their product is up to snuff.

"This will not be a short-lived focus; we have plans to continue to review expectations and performance in the future," Barrett added in the memo.

It's hard to feel sorry for Intel. The company's mistakes are certainly not hurting sales too terribly. In its most recent quarter, Intel chalked up a paltry $38m loss to the Grantsdale recall. And, in fact, management said their biggest problem was being too efficient, as Intel's production overstepped demand - and high demand at that.

"You see more of these problems when demand is high," said Intel spokeswoman and Itanium survivor Barbara Grimes. "If you look at our earnings, clearly demand is high. These problems tend to show up when you are dealing with high volumes, high growth and ramping quickly."

While Intel's dominance in the chip game is not likely to be challenged soon, Barrett does have a right to worry. Rivals such as Samsung and TI have been making impressive gains against Chipzilla. And, on the server front, Intel is facing fresh competition from AMD. Is Intel feeling this pressure? Apparently so. ®

Related stories

Intel: common Xeon, Itanic chipset by 2007
HP boots ServerWorks with new Xeon kit
Microsoft touts AMD, snubs Intel with Yukon beta
Intel mobile, desktop chips for the chop


Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at very close to the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022