Doctors give sickly outlook for NHS IT

You're sick, very, very sick


Doctors working within the NHS have delivered a damning prognosis for the future of the government's planned upgrade to its IT systems.

Seventy five per cent of doctors questioned for Radio 4's File on Four are worried the new system will be a failure. A measly seven per cent believe they have been consulted properly about the new system. It emerged last week that spending on the NHS National Programme for IT could top £30bn over 10 years. The project aims to give every patient an electronic health record accessible to medical staff as needed.

Dr Paul Cundy, chairman of the joint British Medical Association and Royal college of General Practitioners' IT committee, told the BBC that doctors had not been properly consulted. He said: "We know from past disasters and investigations that if you want to implement things successfully in the NHS you must engage clinicians first."

"To put it in easy terms, we have been banging on the door to say 'we have expertise that you could benefit from'".

The committee is also concerned about the privacy implications of a nationwide database.

Richard Granger, the man in charge of technology for the NHS, told the BBC there was more work to do in winning doctors over, but said medical staff were getting involved in decision-making over the upgrade.

File on Four spoke to 500 doctors for the survey. The programme is broadcast tomorrow at 8pm. ®

Related stories

UK sets $1.2bn eGov budget
NHS IT costs skyrocket
Auditors take stock of NHS IT spend


Other stories you might like

  • Millions of people's info stolen from MGM Resorts dumped on Telegram for free
    Meanwhile, Twitter coughs up $150m after using account security contact details for advertising

    Miscreants have dumped on Telegram more than 142 million customer records stolen from MGM Resorts, exposing names, postal and email addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth for any would-be identity thief.

    The vpnMentor research team stumbled upon the files, which totaled 8.7 GB of data, on the messaging platform earlier this week, and noted that they "assume at least 30 million people had some of their data leaked." MGM Resorts, a hotel and casino chain, did not respond to The Register's request for comment.

    The researchers reckon this information is linked to the theft of millions of guest records, which included the details of Twitter's Jack Dorsey and pop star Justin Bieber, from MGM Resorts in 2019 that was subsequently distributed via underground forums.

    Continue reading
  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022