Offshoring inevitable, so get over it

Governments cannot prevent inexorable job migration


The movement of jobs from high cost to lower cost countries is now inevitable and attempts by Western governments to stop it happening are doomed to fail, says analyst firm Frost and Sullivan.

Some higher cost countries have tried to pass laws to stop the export of jobs but if successful this would force a higher cost base on firms which would then lose out to more competive firms not so restricted. The final result of trying to stop jobs being exported could be even the loss of even more jobs.

According to a new Frost and Sullivan survey, IT job exports will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 5.9 per cent between 2002 and the end of 2004. In 2004 some 826,540 jobs will move from France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, the US and UK, representing a combined value of $51.6bn. The US and Japan are top two exporters of IT jobs in 2004. Germany is top job exporter in Europe - it has offshored $48.2bn worth of jobs since the trend began. The UK businesses are most likely to offshore software development and testing.

Satisfaction levels with offshore projects are "unexpectedly high". The survey found most respondents rating their satisfaction between 3 and 4 on a 5 point scale.

India is still the top destination country for offshored jobs. The survey notes that many Indian companies have higher CMM (Capability Maturity Model) ratings than their customer companies. China is in second place but with less than half as many jobs as India. Frost and Sullivan expects this difference to reduce because the Chinese government is actively promoting certain regions for technology jobs and improve skills.

Frost and Sullivan used a combination of primary research in 14 countries and surveys of IT decision makers in France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom. ®

Related stories

BCS says skills beat outsourcing
Don't offshore, pay us instead
Offshoring benefits UK job market


Other stories you might like

  • Zuckerberg sued for alleged role in Cambridge Analytica data-slurp scandal
    I can prove CEO was 'personally involved in Facebook’s failure to protect privacy', DC AG insists

    Cambridge Analytica is back to haunt Mark Zuckerberg: Washington DC's Attorney General filed a lawsuit today directly accusing the Meta CEO of personal involvement in the abuses that led to the data-slurping scandal. 

    DC AG Karl Racine filed [PDF] the civil suit on Monday morning, saying his office's investigations found ample evidence Zuck could be held responsible for that 2018 cluster-fsck. For those who've put it out of mind, UK-based Cambridge Analytica harvested tens of millions of people's info via a third-party Facebook app, revealing a – at best – somewhat slipshod handling of netizens' privacy by the US tech giant.

    That year, Racine sued Facebook, claiming the social network was well aware of the analytics firm's antics yet failed to do anything meaningful until the data harvesting was covered by mainstream media. Facebook repeatedly stymied document production attempts, Racine claimed, and the paperwork it eventually handed over painted a trail he said led directly to Zuck. 

    Continue reading
  • Florida's content-moderation law kept on ice, likely unconstitutional, court says
    So cool you're into free speech because that includes taking down misinformation

    While the US Supreme Court considers an emergency petition to reinstate a preliminary injunction against Texas' social media law HB 20, the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday partially upheld a similar injunction against Florida's social media law, SB 7072.

    Both Florida and Texas last year passed laws that impose content moderation restrictions, editorial disclosure obligations, and user-data access requirements on large online social networks. The Republican governors of both states justified the laws by claiming that social media sites have been trying to censor conservative voices, an allegation that has not been supported by evidence.

    Multiple studies addressing this issue say right-wing folk aren't being censored. They have found that social media sites try to take down or block misinformation, which researchers say is more common from right-leaning sources.

    Continue reading
  • US-APAC trade deal leaves out Taiwan, military defense not ruled out
    All fun and games until the chip factories are in the crosshairs

    US President Joe Biden has heralded an Indo-Pacific trade deal signed by several nations that do not include Taiwan. At the same time, Biden warned China that America would help defend Taiwan from attack; it is home to a critical slice of the global chip industry, after all. 

    The agreement, known as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is still in its infancy, with today's announcement enabling the United States and the other 12 participating countries to begin negotiating "rules of the road that ensure [US businesses] can compete in the Indo-Pacific," the White House said. 

    Along with America, other IPEF signatories are Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Combined, the White House said, the 13 countries participating in the IPEF make up 40 percent of the global economy. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022