SMIC coughs $175m to settle espionage allegations

TSMC prevails


Chinese chip foundry SMIC has paid TSMC, the world's largest semiconductor producer, $175m to settle the legal action its Taiwanese rival launched against it last year.

TSMC will receive the money over a six-year period, with $30m coming in the first five years, followed by a final payment of $25m, SMIC said this weekend.

In addition to settling TSMC's lawsuit and SMIC's countersuit, the two will each get a five-year licence to the others' patents.

TSMC sued SMIC in December 2003, alleging its rival had engaged in industrial espionage. It accused SMIC of luring away its staff and encouraging other employees to spill the beans on upcoming products and technologies.

SMIC always denied the accusations, condemning TSMC's lawsuit as the action of a "bully".

This past summer, TSMC even asked the US Trade Commission to investigate its claims against SMIC with a view to banning the importation of SMIC-produced semiconductors. That request, like the lawsuits, has been rescinded as a result of the settlement.

What's interesting, however, is the admission that both patent cross-licence agreement and settlement "are terminable upon a breach by SMIC", the pair said, a course of action which "may result in the reinstitution of the legal proceedings and acceleration of the outstanding payments under the settlement agreement".

In short, TSMC is telling SMIC not to misbehave in future, an indication perhaps that it had sufficient evidence of malfeasance to force the settlement on its rival. Indeed, SMIC's announcement of the deal explicitly notes that "the settlement does not grant a license to use any of TSMC's trade secrets" - hardly the wording you'd expect the victor in such a case. ®

Related stories

Chips are down for Taiwan foundry giants
TSMC, UMC fab utilisation to plummet in Q4
TSMC asks US to ban SMIC chip imports
SMIC accuses TSMC of 'bullying' tactics
TSMC files 'verification' of SMIC spy claim
TSMC sues rival, alleging industrial espionage


Other stories you might like

  • Will Lenovo ever think beyond hardware?
    Then again, why develop your own software à la HPE GreenLake when you can use someone else's?

    Analysis Lenovo fancies its TruScale anything-as-a-service (XaaS) platform as a more flexible competitor to HPE GreenLake or Dell Apex. Unlike its rivals, Lenovo doesn't believe it needs to mimic all aspects of the cloud to be successful.

    While subscription services are nothing new for Lenovo, the company only recently consolidated its offerings into a unified XaaS service called TruScale.

    On the surface TruScale ticks most of the XaaS boxes — cloud-like consumption model, subscription pricing — and it works just like you'd expect. Sign up for a certain amount of compute capacity and a short time later a rack full of pre-plumbed compute, storage, and network boxes are delivered to your place of choosing, whether that's a private datacenter, colo, or edge location.

    Continue reading
  • Intel is running rings around AMD and Arm at the edge
    What will it take to loosen the x86 giant's edge stranglehold?

    Analysis Supermicro launched a wave of edge appliances using Intel's newly refreshed Xeon-D processors last week. The launch itself was nothing to write home about, but a thought occurred: with all the hype surrounding the outer reaches of computing that we call the edge, you'd think there would be more competition from chipmakers in this arena.

    So where are all the AMD and Arm-based edge appliances?

    A glance through the catalogs of the major OEMs – Dell, HPE, Lenovo, Inspur, Supermicro – returned plenty of results for AMD servers, but few, if any, validated for edge deployments. In fact, Supermicro was the only one of the five vendors that even offered an AMD-based edge appliance – which used an ageing Epyc processor. Hardly a great showing from AMD. Meanwhile, just one appliance from Inspur used an Arm-based chip from Nvidia.

    Continue reading
  • NASA's Psyche mission: 2022 launch is off after software arrives late
    Launch window slides into 2023 or 2024 for asteroid-probing project

    Sadly for NASA's mission to take samples from the asteroid Psyche, software problems mean the spacecraft is going to miss its 2022 launch window.

    The US space agency made the announcement on Friday: "Due to the late delivery of the spacecraft's flight software and testing equipment, NASA does not have sufficient time to complete the testing needed ahead of its remaining launch period this year, which ends on October 11."

    While it appears the software and testbeds are now working, there just isn't enough time to get everything done before a SpaceX Falcon Heavy sends the spacecraft to study a metallic-rich asteroid of the same name.

    Continue reading
  • Rise in Taiwanese energy prices may hit global chip production
    National provider considering cost increase of 8%, which could be passed on to tech customers

    Taiwan's state-owned energy company is looking to raise prices for industrial users, a move likely to impact chipmakers such as TSMC, which may well have a knock-on effect on the semiconductor supply chain.

    According to Bloomberg, the Taiwan Power Company, which produces electricity for the island nation, has proposed increasing electricity costs by at least 8 percent for industrial users, the first increase in four years.

    The power company has itself been hit by the rising costs of fuel, including the imported coal and natural gas it uses to generate electricity. At the same time, the country is experiencing record demand for power because of increasing industrial requirements and because of high temperatures driving the use of air conditioning, as reported by the local Taipei Times.

    Continue reading
  • Tech companies ready public stances on Roe v. Wade
    Some providing out-of-state medical expenses, others spout general pro-choice statements

    Several US tech companies have taken a stance or issued statements promising healthcare-related support for employees following the Supreme Court's ruling to overturn Roe v Wade last Friday.

    A Supreme Court draft opinion that was leaked in February provided advanced warning of the legal eventuality, giving companies plenty of time to prepare official positions and related policies for employees.

    Without proper policies in place, tech companies could put themselves at risk of "brain drain" as employees become tempted to relocate to states where abortion access is readily available or to companies that better support potential needs as healthcare in the US is more often tied to an employer than not.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022