Europe annexes Caribbean islands

Caymans in the wrong location for ICANN


You often hear it said that the Internet is redrawing the map of the world, but little did any of us know that was a literal truth.

Because - at least according to Internet overseer ICANN - 20,000 square miles of Caribbean water and land has been lifted intact, transported 5000 miles east and deposited in the heart of Europe.

Yes, by the power of IP, the Cayman Islands, usually resting comfortably between the Mexican coast and Cuba, is officially part of Europe, and has been since 2003, despite what the atlases say.

How come? Look no further than the Country-code Names Supporting Organisation (ccNSO), one of eight constituencies that make up the policy-making element of ICANN, and which maintains country-specific top-level domains.

The ccNSO recently drew fire from the chairman of Centr, an organisation representing a good proportion of the world's domain name registries. In a blunt letter to ICANN, he took issue with the organisation, dismissing its approach as "a misrepresentation of the realities at hand".

Centr accused ICANN of trying to be a quasi-regulator and said the sovereign Internet-using nations of the world would not accept a Californian private company giving them orders. This, in effect, is what the ccNSO was doing, and its bylaws needed to be changed before Centr would consider joining, the letter stated.

Just 15 per cent of the global country-code top-level domain community has signed up to the ccNSO, Centr argued, so if ICANN wants more legitimacy by winning the support of more of the remaining countries, it will have to change the way the ccNSO works.

But does it exist?

Naturally, we decided to look further into the issue. And most surprising of all was the fact that the ccNSO arguably doesn't actually exist as a legitimate body.

According to ICANN's own bylaws, for the ccNSO to hold elections and hence be able to take part in proceedings "there must be a minimum of 30 members with at least four from each of the five ICANN geographic regions". That rule was laid down in June 2003, and the plan then was to get the ccNSO up and running by October 2003.

Unfortunately, the rule proved a bit of a stickler because everyone in Europe refused to join. Persistently. And they still do. Conference calls between those who did join - mostly from Africa and Asia-Pacific - started 3 September 2003 and continued every week for six weeks, consistently dealing with the fact that no one in Europe would join the ccNSO, making it impossible for the organisation to exist under the terms of its own charter.

The Netherlands joined on 3 September 2003. Then the Czech Republic jumped on board on 23 December 2003. But that was it. None of the other 45 domains in Europe would sign up - despite the fact that Europe currently represents over 60 per cent of all country-code Internet domains.

By 8 September 2003, Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America all had their minimum of four domains. However, North America only had three, and neither Bermuda (.bm) nor Greenland (.gl), St Pierre and Miquelon (.pm), or the United States Minor Outlying Islands (.um) could be persuaded to become the fourth.

So when Puerto Rico, always previously known as a Caribbean island, joined on 5 December it suddenly found itself a part of North America by dint of the fact it is still owned by the US. A slightly faulty logic but one you can see the reasoning behind it.

However, this brand new rule was then suddenly extended to the Cayman Islands, a UK territory albeit with its own Legislative Assembly and Executive Council. The Islands joined up on 21 January 2004, following in the footsteps of neighbours Mexico and Cuba. But unlike those countries, which were assigned to Latin America, the Cayman Islands became an honorary part of Europe.

Even with such judicious fudging, the 47-member, sorry 48-member ccNSO was still one European short. It wasn't until 27 February 2004, when the 2.5 square-mile lump of rock called Gibraltar signed up to the ccNSO, that it had four European members. A day later, the ccNSO was declared a legitimate organisation, four months late and having twice redrawn the map of the world.

Next page: So what?

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022