Fake news? More like ache news. Grandma, grampa 'more likely' to share made-up articles during US election

Oldies should stick to handing out Werther's Originals, not headlines, study suggests

Senior Americans aged 65 and older shared more fake news on Facebook during the 2016 US Presidential election than any other age group, according to a study published on Wednesday.

Researchers from New York University and Princeton University looked into what 1,300 folks participating in the study posted on their Facebook timelines between April and November 2016. Shared articles were tagged as fake news if the links went to sites well known for spreading false information repeatedly.

Said sites did not include the usual roster of Breitbart, Fox News, et al routinely accused of making up stories: instead, think small highly partisan blogs that use every trick in the book to go viral. Craig Silverman produced a list of them, and this was used by the eggheads to identify fake news peddlers.

The results of their study showed that people rarely shared fake news at all, or rather, didn't share the so-called viral blog posts – more than 90 per cent of participants did not fall for the lies. But out of the small 8.5 per cent that did, they were predominantly more likely to be people aged 65 or over.

“The oldest age group was associated with sharing nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains on Facebook as those in the youngest age group”, the paper stated. Out of all the different links shared, 11 per cent of them were fake news spread by elderly people compared to only three per cent by people between the ages of 18 to 29.

What’s also interesting is that the result was independent from other factors. It didn’t matter if the Facebook user identified themselves as Republican or Democrat or if they were liberal, moderate, or conservative.


UK 'fake news' inquiry calls for end to tech middleman excuses, election law overhaul


“Holding constant ideology, party identification, or both, respondents in each age category were more likely to share fake news than respondents in the next-youngest group, and the gap in the rate of fake news sharing between those in our oldest category (over 65) and youngest category is large and notable,” the researchers wrote.

Joshua Tucker, co-author of the paper and a politics professor at New York University, told The Register, that the next step is to figure of why seniors are more likely to share fake news.

“Probably the most likely explanation would be one revolving around digital literacy: perhaps older Americans are just less familiar with the new technology of social media, and therefore were less likely to understand that fake news could look similar to real news when it appeared on Facebook,” he said. “But at this point in time, that's just a guess.”

The researchers hope that finding out why could prevent misinformation spreading on the internet. In a previous study, another group of researchers discovered that people were worse than than bots for infecting Twitter with viral false stories. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Protonmail celebrates Swiss court victory exempting it from telco data retention laws

    Doesn't stop local courts' surveillance orders, though

    Encrypted email provider Protonmail has hailed a recent Swiss legal ruling as a "victory for privacy," after winning a lawsuit that sees it exempted from data retention laws in the mountainous realm.

    Referring to a previous ruling that exempted instant messaging services from data capture and storage laws, the Protonmail team said this week: "Together, these two rulings are a victory for privacy in Switzerland as many Swiss companies are now exempted from handing over certain user information in response to Swiss legal orders."

    Switzerland's Federal Administrative Court ruled on October 22 that email providers in Switzerland are not considered telecommunications providers under Swiss law, thereby removing them from the scope of data retention requirements imposed on telcos.

    Continue reading
  • Japan picks AWS and Google for first gov cloud push

    Local players passed over for Digital Agency’s first project

    Japan's Digital Agency has picked Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud for its first big reform push.

    The Agency started operations in September 2021, years after efforts like the UK's Government Digital Service (GDS) or Australia's Digital Transformation Agency (DTA). The body was a signature reform initiated by Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, who spent his year-long stint in the top job trying to curb Japan's reliance on paper documents, manual processes, and faxes. Japan's many government agencies also operated their websites independently of each other, most with their own design and interface.

    The new Agency therefore has a remit to "cut across all ministries" and "provide services that are driven not toward ministries, agency, laws, or systems, but toward users and to improve user-experience".

    Continue reading
  • Singaporean minister touts internet 'kill switch' that finds kids reading net nasties and cuts 'em off ASAP

    Fancies a real-time crowdsourced content rating scheme too

    A Minister in the Singapore government has suggested the creation of an internet kill switch that would prevent minors from reading questionable material online – perhaps using ratings of content created in real time by crowdsourced contributors.

    "The post-COVID world will bring new challenges globally, including to us in the security arena," said Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen at a Tuesday ceremony to award the city-state's 2021 Defense Technology Prize.

    "For operations, the SAF (Singapore Armed Force) has to expand its capabilities in the digital domain. Whether for administrative or operational purposes, I think that we will need to leverage technology to the maximum," he declared.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021