Mature IT workers are valuable

'Grey' matter, er matters


The skills and experience older people can offer working in IT have been undermined by recent press coverage, according to new research.

The argument, which has rattled throughout national press and the blogosphere in recent months, says the ever-changing nature of technology demands a young, energetic workforce equipped to deal with the digital age.

But the assertion that older people struggle to adapt to new technology is "irresponsible and just plain wrong", said Phil Murphy in the Forrester report "CIOs: Avoid War Between IT's Twentysomethings And More Mature Workers".

In the report he debunks various assumptions including the idea that so-called baby boomers will "retire en masse". Instead, he argues that recent statistics in the US suggest that many people cannot afford to retire as early as they would like and that mature workers have a lot to offer in terms of their application of knowledge, as well as mentoring roles.

He goes on to say that overlooking older workers is "counterproductive" for business.

"The top third of older workers presents no management problem; these workers' eagerness to learn new technology requires only encouragement and access to tools," said Murphy.

The report advises that the key to running a successful IT business is in tapping into the diversity of the workforce available. Rather than excluding a large swath of people, management should embrace the different sets of skills and combine knowledge across generations.

It points to COBOL as one such example. Far from being a dead skill, the fact IBM is investing $100m in revitalising the system illustrates the value of mature workers in IT as they can play a key mentoring role for a younger generation not skilled in mainframe technology.

"By pairing them with older workers, younger staff members more quickly gain the seasoning that helps them to advance."

Age discrimination is now illegal in the UK workplace. This, along with a generally aging population, means it might be wise for IT bosses to heed the advice given in the report and fully realise the potential of their workforce. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022