Dell delivers Quads

Gives birth to high performance servers and workstations


Dell is selling its servers and workstations with Intel's Quad-Core Xeon processors on board.

The company is the first to announce availability of the new processors which become an option for all ranges currently offering Intel dual-core processors.

There are two processor versions available, the 1.6 GHz E5310 at £470 and the 1.8GHz E5320 for £610. The chips, developed under the codename Clovertown, cover the lower ranges of the quad-cores detailed by Intel, and the faster 2.33GHz and 2.66GHz processors may not be available in quantity until 2007.

Pin compatibility means the dual processor servers are available with either duo or quad configurations. It also means that Dell's lead will be short-lived.

The workstations will appear soon after the servers, Dell said, but the higher performance versions using Quad-Core Extreme chips will probably not be available until early next year.

The PowerEdge servers now available with Quad-Core Xeons are models 1900, 1950, 1955, 2900, 2950 and SC1430, and the 1955 blade.

At a press conference in Barcelona, Eric Velfre, director of enterprise marketing for Dell EMEA, claimed the new server options offer up to 1.6 times the performance of equivalent dual core systems and offer more bang for your buck with a performance per watt increase of up to 1.4 times.

The quad announcement accompanied the release of dual-core AMD servers. Velfre said this fully justifies Dell's recent decision to add AMD as a supplier allowing Dell to offer its customers choice and the best performance and pricing to suit their needs.

He added that when AMD delivers its own quad-core processors in Q2 of next year, the technology would become the mainstream technology in the server.

A base configuration of the SC1430 server without operating system and VAT costs £839 and at the high end the basic price of the 2950 is £1,379. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022