Chopping the Long Tail down to size

Wired's advice could seriously damage your business


Old rules are rediscovered

Page says the breakthrough had come via Andrew's father Martin Bud, a businessman and researcher whose work had informed a now obscure tome with a distinctly unsexy name. John Goodell Brown's Statistical Forecasting for Inventory Control was published in 1957, and is now out of print. But it forecast the digital world far closer than anything in WiReD.

"In many ways, we've been in the Long Tail business since 1914", says Page, referring to the UK copyright collection society the MCPS-PRS Alliance, where he is chief economist. “That's what collective rights licensing is. It doesn't matter if a song is a hit or niche, once it's been licensed under a blanket agreement so there are no barriers to using it."

And neither lead economist agrees that the Tail will be any more prevalent when P2P file sharing is taken into account. If anything, it's more pronounced, Page suggests:

"Look at Radiohead's experiment. Even when they reduced the price of copyright to free, there were 2.3 million downloads in the first three weeks - and 400,000 in a day. This was perhaps the most pirated piece of music of all time - and yet every fan could get it legally without paying. So the black market could potentially be even more concentrated."

New World, Old Rules

For Page, the grain of truth in the digital music revolution is buried beneath a mountain of nonsense.

With cheap production tools and the internet as a new distribution channel, some costs of production are indeed lowered, and some artists can indeed cut out (or "disintermediate") the middle man. But those old rules still make a significant difference to your business strategy.

"In particular, the division of labour and economies of scale still have tremendous relevance to understanding today’s market”, Page notes.

“The Long Tail Movement is in trouble”

The division of labour means it can benefit you to employ a specialist intermediary, while economies of scale mean the bigger you are, the better terms you can negotiate.

"What's interesting, from a collecting society's perspective, is that when you have a dramatic increase in both rights holders on one side - more artists and songwriters - and rights users on the other side - an explosion of more digital music start ups - then, regardless of what the Long Tail is or isn't, the case for a common platform grows. This common platform pools rights, reduces transaction costs and prevents fragmentation - and everyone sees benefits.

"Otherwise those start ups won’t get started - and those performers and songwriters won’t get paid".

WiReD's faith-based economics

Bud is surprisingly generous about Anderson's book.

"It's an excellent book and thoughtfully written. But The Long Tail receives very little numerical examination. Saying the Tail has great value is not borne out by the evidence in this case."

Anderson's inspiration was the desire to put a positive spin on a depressing observation. An essay by Clay Shirky suggested that weblog readership followed a Pareto Curve (or "Power Law") - which dismayed many early Web 2.0 evangelists. Early bloggers began to lose faith. The Long Tail helped bolster morale - although its success owed much to sloppy thinking - and in particular, metaphorical logic.

This supposes that because one thing is like another, it exhibits the same characteristics. For example:

  1. Oranges are nutritious
  2. Billiard balls are like oranges
  3. We should eat billiard balls

To see how far this can travel, once borne on the heady vapors of Web 2.0, take this passage by Jack Schofield in The Guardian from 2006:

"The Long Tail is making an impact because it is a powerful idea that provides us with a new(ish) way of looking at the world. Copernicus did the same thing for many people when he pointed out that the earth went round the sun, not vice versa, though no planetary bodies were physically moved in the process."

The propensity of journalists - even highly experienced journalists - to fantasize about the world rather than examine it critically is one of the defining features of modern technology coverage.

As Andrew Bud puts it - "The Long Tail created a Movement, and it's the Long Tail 'Movement' that's in trouble."

Page is making a habit of debunking the WiReD clique that is the source of so much bad business advice. We published his response to Kevin Kelly (WiReD's founding editor) - Can 1,000 fans replace the music business? - here earlier this year. More of his work can be found online here. ®

[Disclosure: your reporter's explanation of Californian technology utopians was credited in this presentation]

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • AI really can't copyright the art it generates – US officials
    Get ready for robot lobbyists to persuade robot lawmakers to pass robot-friendly laws?

    AI algorithms cannot copyright the digital artwork they generate, the US Copyright Office has insisted.

    Officials this month turned down a request brought by Stephen Thaler, founder of Imagination Engines, to register a copyright claim for a digital image he said was produced by machine-learning software. Thaler said the piece, titled A Recent Entrance to Paradise, was crafted by Creativity Machine, an automated system he invented and owned, and argued the software should be recognized as the author of the image.

    The US Copyright Office's review board said although it accepted the code-generated picture was made without "any creative contribution from a human actor," the board could not fulfill the request. Today's copyright laws only protect "the fruits of intellectual labor" that "are founded in the creative powers of the [human] mind," the board said in a letter [PDF] directed to Thaler's lawyer Ryan Abbott.

    Continue reading
  • Deere & Co won't give out software and data needed for repairs, watchdog told
    Farming groups demand some kind of actual action from regulators

    Updated Twelve farm labor, advocacy, and repair groups filed a complaint last week with the US Federal Trade Commission claiming that agricultural equipment maker Deere & Company has unlawfully refused to provide the software and technical data necessary to repair its machinery.

    The groups include National Farmers Union, Iowa Farmers Union, Missouri Farmers Union, Montana Farmers Union, Nebraska Farmers Union, Ohio Farmers Union, Wisconsin Farmers Union, Farm Action, the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, the Illinois Public Interest Research Group, the Digital Right to Repair Coalition, and iFixit.

    They contend that Deere & Company owns over 50 per cent of the agricultural machinery market in the US and has deliberately restricted access to its diagnostic software and other information necessary to repair its products in violation of the Sherman Act and statutes covering unfair and deceptive trade practice. And they're asking the FTC to intervene by putting an end to these practices.

    Continue reading
  • Malaysia tweaks copyright law to hit streamers of copyright-infringing content
    Those enabling piracy may be guilty until they prove otherwise

    Malaysia's House of Representatives has passed an amendment to a 1987 Copyright Act that makes enabling illegal streaming punishable by fine, prison or both.

    Those who facilitate copyright infringement face fines of RM200,000 ($2,377) or more, up to 20 years prison, or a combination of both, whether their illicit action be through manufacturing, importing, providing, advertising, or distributing streaming technologies.

    By specifying streaming, the amendment updates the previous outdated privacy law that focused on those downloading the content into permanent storage and those who subsequently bootlegged the videos, something that all of a sudden seems very 2008.

    Continue reading
  • Attack on Titan: Four Japanese Manga publishers sue Cloudflare
    Allege content delivery network enables piracy

    Updated Four major Manga publishers are set to sue internet-grooming firm Cloudflare, on grounds its content delivery network facilitates piracy of their wares.

    The four companies – Kodansha, Shueisha, Shogakukan and Kadokawa – together dominate the market for Japanese comics and own many iconic properties.

    The publishers also believe they're victims of widespread piracy.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022