Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customise your settings, hit “Customise Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

Darling's £0.5bn offshore windfarm 'leccy-bill stealth levy

'3m windmill-powered homes' claim is pure spin


Budget 09 A lot of people are wondering how the British government can deliver colossal bank bailouts and pay rapidly-climbing dole bills - all the while collecting less taxes as people are laid off and companies founder - and yet still find money to subsidise green energy. Chancellor Alistair Darling has found a cunning way around the problem: he will simply raise electricity prices and channel the resulting cash into wind farms.

The process isn't described like that, of course. Mr Darling, presenting the Budget yesterday in parliament, put it like this:

We must build on Britain’s status as the world leader in offshore wind power generation.

The credit squeeze is holding back major offshore wind projects.

I want to lift the barriers – through £525m of new financial support over the next two years for off-shore wind, funded through the renewables obligation.

The potential is enormous. I am confident that this will lead to major projects getting the go-ahead quickly, providing enough electricity to meet the needs of up to 3m households.

This is described in the national dailies thus:

There are currently 300,000 households supplied by energy from offshore wind farms, but the Government has pledged to increase that to 3.1 million with £525 million investment ...

Mr Darling also found £45 million for small scale renewables like wind turbines on houses ...

It seems that even with the revenues shrinking, bills climbing and the government's credit running out, Mr D has managed to find half a billion from the public coffers for offshore wind: remarkable.

Well, it would be remarkable if it were true. But it's not. The public coffers contain nothing but a bit of paper reading "IOU £beaucoup trillions, G Brown", and in fact that half-billion will be found from the pockets of electricity users. You and me, that is.

The key is the phrase "funded through the renewables obligation". If we delve deep (page 148) into the Treasury pdfs which provide detail on Mr Darling's speech, we find what the government actually plan to do.

Budget 2009 announces a banding review with the intention of increasing the banding of Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) from 1.5 to 2.0 for offshore wind projects meeting specified completion criteria if they place new orders in 2009-10, and then 1.75 in 2010-11. This is expected to provide £525 million support from 2011 to 2014, protecting 3 GW of proposed investment over the next two years, enough to power an estimated 2.8 million homes.

The Renewables Obligation scheme is the only reason there is any renewable energy in the UK at all. As renewable juice costs more to make than coal, gas or nuclear - and generally has the added disadvantage that you can't turn it on and off on demand - companies wouldn't normally be able to sell it.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021