Spotify on iPhone: nice app, but no multitasking

A fatal flaw?


Review The Spotify application for the iPhone extends the usefulness of the service greatly - at the cost of a tenner a month. However the app has one show-stopping flaw: you can't play music when the application is in the background.

This is not a hindrance shared by the iPhone or iPod Touch's default music application - and even on the earliest iPods, you could play Blocks or check your diary while music continued to play. For some this may merely be an irritating quirk, but for others it could be a deal-breaker. The whole point of getting a top-of-the-range music player is for its versatility.

The free player is available to all through the Apple App Store - it asks for your Spotify user name and password when it's first run. If you're a Premium member, you're in.

Grab music to play locally using "offline playlists"

The application allows you to cache your Spotify playlists, and for the enormous "celestial jukebox" music library to be perused, and songs played on demand, locally over a WiFi 3G connection. Such is the simplicity, that it'll take you longer to read this page than it will to find your way around Spotify's iPhone app. There are three tabs, the first two of which are Playlists and "Search", (which I found was only spasmodically available over 3G connections). The third is the About / Settings box, called "More".

Playlists can be added and deleted on the fly - which makes it a smarter client than the iPhone's native music player, as this welcome feature is missing from iPods. You can even change the order. It was possible, however, to manipulate the playlists regardless of whether the connection was 2G, 3G or Wi-Fi. Unlike the desktop, playlists can't be shared, nor can the URL or URI of the song be extracted.

From the Playlists tab, you can then select which lists to synchronize locally. The playlists are then populated in the background if you have an active WLAN connection. There is little control over when or how these downloads occur. I found that with an active WLAN connection, the local downloads began immediately. With just a 3G connection available, they didn't. Unfortunately, no indication at all is given - for example, "connect to a Wi-Fi network to download these songs."

Tap the cover art to bring up a few more options

My first attempt to use Search over 3G was flawless - and incredibly, songs began playing immediately, and could be skipped, with very low latencies. This is a hallmark of the Spotify desktop app, and the engineers have managed to reproduce the experience on a mobile. Or at least sometimes. At other times even with 5 bars of 3G, the Search was mysteriously greyed out and unavailable. Similarly there's no explanation offered to the user.

Over the page: is it any good?

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Workers win vote to form first-ever US Apple Store union
    Results set to be ratified by labor board by end of the week

    Workers at an Apple Store in Towson, Maryland have voted to form a union, making them the first of the iGiant's retail staff to do so in the United States.

    Out of 110 eligible voters, 65 employees voted in support of unionization versus 33 who voted against it. The organizing committee, known as the Coalition of Organized Retail Employees (CORE), has now filed to certify the results with America's National Labor Relations Board. Members joining this first-ever US Apple Store union will be represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM).

    "I applaud the courage displayed by CORE members at the Apple store in Towson for achieving this historic victory," IAM's international president Robert Martinez Jr said in a statement on Saturday. "They made a huge sacrifice for thousands of Apple employees across the nation who had all eyes on this election."

    Continue reading
  • Apple’s M2 chip isn’t a slam dunk, but it does point to the future
    The chip’s GPU and neural engine could overshadow Apple’s concession on CPU performance

    Analysis For all the pomp and circumstance surrounding Apple's move to homegrown silicon for Macs, the tech giant has admitted that the new M2 chip isn't quite the slam dunk that its predecessor was when compared to the latest from Apple's former CPU supplier, Intel.

    During its WWDC 2022 keynote Monday, Apple focused its high-level sales pitch for the M2 on claims that the chip is much more power efficient than Intel's latest laptop CPUs. But while doing so, the iPhone maker admitted that Intel has it beat, at least for now, when it comes to CPU performance.

    Apple laid this out clearly during the presentation when Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, said the M2's eight-core CPU will provide 87 percent of the peak performance of Intel's 12-core Core i7-1260P while using just a quarter of the rival chip's power.

    Continue reading
  • Apple dev roundup: Weather data meets privacy, and other good stuff
    No AR/VR glasses but at least RoomPlan will let you make rapid 3D room maps

    WWDC Apple this week at its Worldwide Developer Conference delivered software development kits (SDKs) for beta versions of its iOS 16, iPadOS 16, macOS 13, tvOS 16, and watchOS 9 platforms.

    For developers sold on seeking permission from Apple to distribute their software and paying a portion of revenue for the privilege, it's a time to celebrate and harken to the message from the mothership.

    While the consumer-facing features in the company's various operating systems consist largely of incremental improvements like aesthetic and workflow enhancements, the developer APIs in the underlying code should prove more significant because they will allow programmers to build apps and functions that weren't previously possible. Many of the new capabilities are touched on in Apple's Platforms State of the Union presentation.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022