Seagate puts out Barracuda Low Power Green

Eco-nomical


Seagate has quietly launched a green version of its Barracuda desktop drive, with three platters holding 1.5 or 2TB and spinning at a mere 5,900rpm.

There was going to be a Barracuda LP (Low Power) a while ago, but it has become the Barracuda Green. There are two versions on Seagate's website, ones with a 32MB cache and 3Gbit/s SATA interface and ones with a 64MB cache and 6Gbit/s interface. Both versions come with Advanced Formatting and in 1.5TB and 2TB capacity points, with an entry-level 1TB 3Gbit/s SATA interface one.

There are two areal density levels. The 3Gbit/s SATA drives have 341.5Gbit/in2 whereas the 6Gbit/s SATA ones have 422Gbit/in2. Seagate's spec sheets tell us the latter drives have six heads and three platters, meaning 666.7GB per platter.

The company doesn't say how many platters there on the 3gig SATA drives, but a look at the power draw suggests there are four as the 3-platter 6gig drives use significantly less power.

The 3gig SATA, 2TB drive has an average operating power use of 6.8watts, a startup draw of 2 Amps at 12 Volts, and an idle draw of 5.5watts. The 6gig 2TB drive is much better, operating with 3.8watts, starting up with 2 Amps at 12 Volts, and idling with 4.5watts.

These new Seagate drives spin a little faster than WD's near-equivalent Caviar Greens which rotate at 5,400rpm. They do however go up to 3TB in capacity, which might be thought more important than a ten per cent increase in spin speed by Seagate's Barracuda.

Seagate does have a 3TB FreeAgent GoFlex drive which uses, we think, an unannounced Barracuda or Constellation model. That could indicate a 3TB Barracuda Green might be coming around soon.

Amazon pricing has a 2TB, 6gig SATA Seagate Barracuda Green model available for $127 and the 1.5TB sibling at $99.00. ®


Other stories you might like

  • How to keep a support contract: Make the user think they solved the problem

    Look what you found! Aren't you clever!

    On Call Let us take a little trip back to the days before the PC, when terminals ruled supreme, to find that the more things change the more they stay the same. Welcome to On Call.

    Today's story comes from "Keith" (not his name) and concerns the rage of a user whose expensive terminal would crash once a day, pretty much at the same time.

    The terminal in question was a TAB 132/15. It was an impressive bit of kit for the time and was capable of displaying 132 characters of crisp, green text on a 15-inch CRT housed in a futuristic plastic case. Luxury for sure, unless one was the financial trader trying to use the device.

    Continue reading
  • Apple kicked an M1-shaped hole in Intel's quarter

    Chipzilla braces for a China-gaming-ban-shaped hole in future results, predicts more product delays

    Intel has blamed Apple's switch to its own M1 silicon in Macs for a dip in sales at its client computing group, and foreshadowed future unpleasantness caused by supply chain issues and China's recent internet crackdowns.

    Chipzilla's finances were robust for the third quarter of its financial year: revenue of $19.2 billion was up five per cent year over year, while net income of $6.8 billion was up 60 per cent compared to 2020's Q3.

    But revenue for the client computing group was down two points. CFO George Davis – whose retirement was announced today – was at pains to point out that were it not for Apple quitting Intel silicon and Chipzilla exiting the modem business, client-related revenue would have risen ten per cent.

    Continue reading
  • How your phone, laptop, or watch can be tracked by their Bluetooth transmissions

    Unique fingerprints lurk in radio signals more often than not, it seems

    Over the past few years, mobile devices have become increasingly chatty over the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) protocol and this turns out to be a somewhat significant privacy risk.

    Seven boffins at University of California San Diego – Hadi Givehchian, Nishant Bhaskar, Eliana Rodriguez Herrera, Héctor Rodrigo López Soto, Christian Dameff, Dinesh Bharadia, and Aaron Schulman – tested the BLE implementations on several popular phones, PCs, and gadgets, and found they can be tracked through their physical signaling characteristics albeit with intermittent success.

    That means the devices may emit a unique fingerprint, meaning it's possible to look out for those fingerprints in multiple locations to figure out where those devices have been and when. This could be used to track people; you'll have to use your imagination to determine who would or could usefully exploit this. That said, at least two members of the team believe it's worth product makers addressing this privacy weakness.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021