Texas antitrust investigators request Google 'ad rate formula'

Plus docs on 'manual override' of search results


Texas antitrust investigators have asked Google to turn over its formula for setting advertising rates and documents that show "manual overriding or altering of” its search rankings, according to a report citing a letter from the Texas attorney general's office.

Bloomberg reports that Kim Van Winkle, an assistant attorney general in Texas’s antitrust division, sent a 13-page letter to a Google lawyer on July 29 requesting the information. According to Bloomberg, the letter also asked for Google documents involving rival search engines from Microsoft and Yahoo!, and about complaints over the behavior of Google's ad system.

Asked to comment on the report, Google spokesman Adam Kovacevich said: "Since we started Google we have worked hard to do the right thing by our users and our industry, and while there’s always going to be room for improvement, we're committed to competing fair and square. We're continuing to work with the Texas Attorney General's office to answer their questions and understand any concerns.”

In early September, Google confirmed that the Texas attorney general's office was conducting an antitrust review of the company. According Google's September statement, Texas attorney general Greg Abbott had asked Mountain View for information regarding three companies: UK-based price comparison engine Foundem – which is also the subject of a Google antitrust investigation in the European Union – New York-based TradeComet, and Ohio-based myTriggers.

According to Bloomberg, the letter to Google sent by the Texas attorney general's office is primarily concerned with information involving AdWords – Google's online ad system – but it also requests information regarding Froogle, Google Product Search, and Google Shopping. (Froogle is the former name of Google Product Search.)

Google Product Search plays a role in the EU's ongoing antitrust investigation of the company. Foundem offers a price comparison service similar to Google Product Search, and it has accused Google of "exploiting its dominance of search in ways that stifle innovation, suppress competition, and erode consumer choice".

Foundem claims that Google uses "discriminatory penalties" to remove sites from its search-results engine regardless of relevance, and that Google's Universal Search setup unfairly promotes the company's own services, including Google Product Search, over competing services.

In addition to antitrust investigations from the Texas attorney general and the EU, Google is facing a US Department of Justice review of its proposed acquisition of flight-data outfit ITA software. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022