The Register Comments Guidelines

New world, nearly new rules

The Register operates a hybrid moderation policy. Here's how it works.

The vast majority of comments will appear on the site automatically. This is because we trust you to follow the house rules.

But just in case ... we have a mechanism for readers to report comments. The moderators will continue to deal with any comments and/or commenters reported to them, and decide whether the comments breach the house rules and should be removed from the site.

Some commenters will continue to have their comments moderated before they appear on the site.

This group includes people who have previously had offensive or libellous comments removed, or who have been frequently reported by other commenters. If comments are reported, the editors will examine the comment as soon as possible, and decide whether it contravenes the house rules. If it does, it will be removed. If it breaks the law, it will be removed. (Breaking the law and breaking house rules might not always be interchangeable.)

If it sounds like we're a bit obsessive about the house rules, you're right. We want El Reg's comment forums to remain a lively, stimulating and noisy place to hang out. We don't want the forums to turn nasty and uncivil.

So I guess you want to know what the house rules are? Well read on.

1. Firstly and perhaps most importantly: Moderation is at our discretion. We publish what we feel is fit for publication. If comments are published without moderation, we still reserve the right to pull them at any time. The vast majority of comments posted will end up on the site. We try to be broad-minded and consistent – but in the end if we don't want it on our site, it doesn't go up or stay up. Correspondence will rarely be entered into on individual decisions.

If you're one of the small group who is subject to moderation, bear in mind that comments may take longer to appear at different times of the day or when we are very busy (especially at the weekend) - all comments are moderated individually. If your comment doesn't show up immediately, be patient - we often have a backlog to work through.

Queries and complaints should be directed to Reg Forums. Several moderators look after the threads and each uses his or her own judgment (comments on individual stories are not usually moderated by the author).

Technical issues should be addressed to the Reg Webmaster.

2. When posting a comment, think about what you're saying and remember you're addressing real people. Be legible and intelligible. Be polite. Animated debate is great - nasty arguments and abuse, not so much. (And try and rein in your pedantry ... 'tis human to err, especially when pointing out the errors of others.)

3. Be pertinent – redundant comments repeating what others have said are liable to be reported and deleted. Try to stay on topic. Read the article before you post, and read the thread too.

4. No trolling - it's OK to be provocative, but trolling is another matter.

5. No spam, no links to porn – don't pimp your own website, blog or business. If you're linking to something that may be seen as naughty, help your fellow commenters by adding a NSFW note.

6. We're thick-skinned, but... if you abuse The Register or its writers your comment may get canned - this is our house, after all. Requests for writers to be sacked or for stories not to have been published are unlikely to hang around for long. Use your common sense.

7. That person who doesn't hate the company you hate... they're not a corporate shill. Don't accuse them of it. Similarly, no one is paying our writers to be nice, or horrible, about anyone. Don't accuse them of it either. Oh, and the moderators are not Nazis. Don't be silly.

8. Please post your comment in the comment box, not in the title field. Currently we allow posts of up to 10,000 characters, which is quite a bit longer than most forums, but try not to post enormous essays or margin-busting links.

9. If we suspect that your comment may be libellous, we will reject it. We err on the side of caution. Remember we are subject to UK libel laws.

10. Post no personal details about others, please. And don't post your own contact details. How do we know they are yours? When posts containing personal details are flagged up to us, we will delete them.

11. Don't be a racist arsehole, a homophobic wanker, a xenophobic idiot or a sexist pig. You know when you're crossing a line – if you don't, learn.

12. We're grateful for corrections. In fact, we've got a new reporting mechanism for corrections. This is what it looks like.

below body article corrections link

So, don't be upset if your corrective comment doesn't appear in the forums – we're not ignoring it. We're just busy round the back giving the offending hack a good talking-to.

13. If you want to take issue with the content of a story, you can email the author by selecting their byline link at the top of the story. They will usually be happy to help, if you're courteous. (Please be courteous.)

14. Do use the 'report comment' button – we take note of each one and often withdraw comments after complaints, and we're grateful for your assistance as spam and other unwelcome things do sometimes slip through – but don't abuse it. A differing opinion does not make reasonable grounds for reporting a comment. You may end up getting flagged if you continually file unwarranted reports.

15. If you are persistently abusive in any way you will be flagged. Your comments will be pre-moderated and may not appear on the site. In very rare circumstances we'll zap your account.

16. We do not have time to edit comments. If you are abusive in an otherwise sensible, insightful post, we may reject the entire comment. Sometimes we'll alert you to this. If your comment is rejected, feel free to edit it yourself and resubmit.

17. We take the law very seriously. Please don't threaten the posters, Reg staffers or anyone else with violence, pain, maiming, etc. If you do, this could be reported to the authorities, and we will fully cooperate with any investigations they choose to pursue.

18. Once again - moderation is at our discretion. Having your comment published on this site is not one of your human rights.

These guidelines are subject to revision. We always welcome your comments and appreciate it when you respect the forums, the moderators and each other. Above all, don't get too upset... it's just the internet.

Forums FAQ


In November 2012, The Register introduced gold, silver and bronze badges for commenters, along with forum privileges for each badge.

The qualifying thresholds for badges are:

  • Bronze More than one year members and more than 100 posts in the last 12 months.
  • Silver Silver badge holders meet bronze requirements and have more than 2000 upvotes.
  • Gold This discretionary badge is awarded by Reg staff to commenters who have been very helpful - to us, through news tips and beta testing, for example - and to their fellow readers, through their posts.

Forum privileges are awarded according to your handle - not by user account. This means that if you change your handle, you will lose your forum privileges. Also, votes on your anonymous posts do not count towards you gaining badges.

Anonymous Coward

We allow anonymous posting because we understand the value in letting people post anonymously.

But posting anonymously has a cost as well. It makes it easier for people to say glib, trite or troll like statements knowing it won't be attributable to them.

For these reasons anonymous posts incur a "penalty".

  • votes on your anonymous posts do not count towards you gaining forum privileges.
  • Anonymous commenters do not get to pick an icon, but are all shown with the Guy Fawkes mask that appears beside anonymous posts.

Create a new topic

You can start a new topic if you have at least five posts accepted and published. (Withdrawing your fifth post will remove the permission.) After your fifth post is accepted it takes up to one hour for the new permission to take effect. Click on Forums home page log-in. The Create a new topic link lives in the Forums Box on the right hand side of the page.

Before you create a new topic

Have a quick look on the forums. Someone may have already created a topic on the same subject - join in!

Topic display order

Topics are displayed by default in this order: sticky and then by topic with most recent post.


You can use basic HTML to format your text - once you have had five posts accepted for publication. Currently we allow: <b>, <strong>, <em>, <i> and <s> (<strike> was dropped in HTML5). Badge holders can also use <sub>, <sup>, <ul>, <li>, <blockquote>, <q>, <code>, and <pre>.


You can add hyperlinks in your post - once you have had 100 posts accepted for publication. We have set the bar high to deter spammers and enable us to assess use. We will review this bar from time to time.

Use your common sense. Do not link to sexist, racist or pornographic material. And do not link to any copyright-breaking or hacking tools. If you do we will withdraw this privilege.

You need to put in the code yourself. You are a techie. This is not hard.

e.g. Not bad. Not bad at all.

Delete posts

Use the Withdraw link that appears in all your posts to delete a comment. For multiple deletions, it is easier to do this via My Posts.

Report abuse

Use the Report abuse link that you can see in all posts (except your own) when you see a comment that breaks house rules on civility and html links. Moderators will attend to this as soon as possible.

Permalink to post

This is embedded in the posted time stamp that appears in each post.

Sort posts by thread | newest | oldest

The default setting is oldest posts first. You can sort posts by thread, newest and oldest using the little drop down menu at the top of each topic. You must be logged in to see and use this feature. This may seem eccentric, but here is our rationale:

Topic sorting wants to be "sticky" i.e., you don't want to have to click to change the sort order each time to return to that topic. One option is cookies, but there is a limit in how many we can store. So we linked it to your account, where you can have as many as you want. Also, it follows you across browsers and machines correctly.


Currently, we support semi-threading - i.e. one level of threading.

Can I search forums?

After a fashion. Use the "search forums" form in the Forums Box on the right hand side. Yes, we know it needs improving.

Posting history

Commenter "handles" appear on the left hand of all posts. Click on the handle to see public posting history. This feature is switched off for commenters who post anonymously (under the collective handle "Anonymous Coward").

Track this topic

This bookmarks or "stars" topics that you are not posting in. Track this topic appears at the top of all open topics. Click the link and the topic now appears in "Your Topics" box - on the right hand side of the page when you are logged in. Click Track this Topic again to stop tracking.

Close this topic

Only moderators can close topics.

Article posts

You can access your article post via My posts (in your Forums Box). But they are not published on El Reg Forums. Click Article topics in the Forums Box to access all posts on all Register articles.

My Topics box

Click My Topics to see the open topics you started, commented on, or "starred" for tracking. Beside each topic headline is a tally of posts made by other commenters since you last posted.

El Reg Forums roadmap - no time scales

We have started a Forum wishlist topic on El Reg forums. Use this thread to give us your roadmap feedback. We want it all in one place.

Roadmap - making the cut

  • Enable editing posts
  • One page - up vote / down vote
  • Inbox to inform you if your account is upgraded, if suspended etc. Give users the chance to reply to moderators via this mechanism
  • Ability to view replies to self via my posts view
  • Badges to indicate levels of accounts / moderators
  • Formatting: introduce line breaks, bullet points, blockquote, superscript, subscript
  • Most recent 50 posts view
  • Demote "closed" topics so that they always appear underneath "open" topics
  • Stats view - most popular topic, etc.

Possible inclusions for roadmap

  • Sitemap
  • HTML formatting bar in Post your own message form
  • Ignore / Follow - individual commenters
  • Nesting - three-level nesting, default or optional. Jury still out
  • View from last read /last post. We think this is useful, but we haven't yet figured out how best to do this
  • Notifications when someone directly replies to your post or to the thread. Via email or forum in-box? And what if there are dozens of responses to the thread?

Unlikely - and only if El Reg Forums get very big

  • Commenter to Commenter communication via forums
  • Invite-only forums / topics
  • Kharma-ish system - would have to balance rewards with attempts to game whatever system we come up with
  • Ability to order posts by popularity - again this could be gamed

Not on roadmap

  • User-defined avatars - we don't want to have to store avatars, or vet them, or get angry if someone changes avatar to something abusive
  • Log-in via third parties - e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Disqus, Linked-in

Why HTML and not BBCode?

HTML is the open standard of the web. Deal with it, bitches.

Why did we choose home-grown?

Our website, CMS, whitepaper library, registration system and forums are core to what we do. And we do core in-house.

What software are we using?

Read this.

RSS / Atom feed for forums?

There is a little RSS logo on the top right of a topic page. Or you can adjust the URL - it should be fairly obvious what you need to do:

Clicking on any user's name will take you to a list of his or her posts. Again, there is an yellow/orange RSS logo top-right-ish.

You can also get RSS feeds for any section, although we do not currently show you the link for these anywhere.

We do not offer a full site feed of all posts. This is do-able, but we do not see the utility - unless you wanted to screen-scrape our forums. And why would you want to do that? ®

Other stories you might like

  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading
  • Conti: Russian-backed rulers of Costa Rican hacktocracy?
    Also, Chinese IT admin jailed for deleting database, and the NSA promises no more backdoors

    In brief The notorious Russian-aligned Conti ransomware gang has upped the ante in its attack against Costa Rica, threatening to overthrow the government if it doesn't pay a $20 million ransom. 

    Costa Rican president Rodrigo Chaves said that the country is effectively at war with the gang, who in April infiltrated the government's computer systems, gaining a foothold in 27 agencies at various government levels. The US State Department has offered a $15 million reward leading to the capture of Conti's leaders, who it said have made more than $150 million from 1,000+ victims.

    Conti claimed this week that it has insiders in the Costa Rican government, the AP reported, warning that "We are determined to overthrow the government by means of a cyber attack, we have already shown you all the strength and power, you have introduced an emergency." 

    Continue reading
  • China-linked Twisted Panda caught spying on Russian defense R&D
    Because Beijing isn't above covert ops to accomplish its five-year goals

    Chinese cyberspies targeted two Russian defense institutes and possibly another research facility in Belarus, according to Check Point Research.

    The new campaign, dubbed Twisted Panda, is part of a larger, state-sponsored espionage operation that has been ongoing for several months, if not nearly a year, according to the security shop.

    In a technical analysis, the researchers detail the various malicious stages and payloads of the campaign that used sanctions-related phishing emails to attack Russian entities, which are part of the state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec Corporation.

    Continue reading
  • FTC signals crackdown on ed-tech harvesting kid's data
    Trade watchdog, and President, reminds that COPPA can ban ya

    The US Federal Trade Commission on Thursday said it intends to take action against educational technology companies that unlawfully collect data from children using online educational services.

    In a policy statement, the agency said, "Children should not have to needlessly hand over their data and forfeit their privacy in order to do their schoolwork or participate in remote learning, especially given the wide and increasing adoption of ed tech tools."

    The agency says it will scrutinize educational service providers to ensure that they are meeting their legal obligations under COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

    Continue reading
  • Mysterious firm seeks to buy majority stake in Arm China
    Chinese joint venture's ousted CEO tries to hang on - who will get control?

    The saga surrounding Arm's joint venture in China just took another intriguing turn: a mysterious firm named Lotcap Group claims it has signed a letter of intent to buy a 51 percent stake in Arm China from existing investors in the country.

    In a Chinese-language press release posted Wednesday, Lotcap said it has formed a subsidiary, Lotcap Fund, to buy a majority stake in the joint venture. However, reporting by one newspaper suggested that the investment firm still needs the approval of one significant investor to gain 51 percent control of Arm China.

    The development comes a couple of weeks after Arm China said that its former CEO, Allen Wu, was refusing once again to step down from his position, despite the company's board voting in late April to replace Wu with two co-chief executives. SoftBank Group, which owns 49 percent of the Chinese venture, has been trying to unentangle Arm China from Wu as the Japanese tech investment giant plans for an initial public offering of the British parent company.

    Continue reading
  • SmartNICs power the cloud, are enterprise datacenters next?
    High pricing, lack of software make smartNICs a tough sell, despite offload potential

    SmartNICs have the potential to accelerate enterprise workloads, but don't expect to see them bring hyperscale-class efficiency to most datacenters anytime soon, ZK Research's Zeus Kerravala told The Register.

    SmartNICs are widely deployed in cloud and hyperscale datacenters as a means to offload input/output (I/O) intensive network, security, and storage operations from the CPU, freeing it up to run revenue generating tenant workloads. Some more advanced chips even offload the hypervisor to further separate the infrastructure management layer from the rest of the server.

    Despite relative success in the cloud and a flurry of innovation from the still-limited vendor SmartNIC ecosystem, including Mellanox (Nvidia), Intel, Marvell, and Xilinx (AMD), Kerravala argues that the use cases for enterprise datacenters are unlikely to resemble those of the major hyperscalers, at least in the near term.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022