Citrix kicks down door, breaks up OpenStack cloud party

CloudStack's anti-Amazon, Rackspace-free Apache play


Open ... and Shut Two years ago, Rackspace went after Amazon in a big way, launching an open-source cloud initiative called OpenStack. Since that time, more than 150 companies have signed up to the anti-Amazon party. Last week, however, one big participant decided to leave OpenStack to create an after-party that by many accounts fixes a slew of problems inherent in OpenStack's design-by-committee approach.

As reported here, Citrix has abandoned OpenStack and launched its own CloudStack cloud platform as part of the Apache Software Foundation.

Citrix, in other words, is finally learning to play the open-source game, and OpenStack may suffer significantly because of it.

OpenStack's problems are self-inflicted. Despite its impressive community support - everyone wants to get on a train that promises to blunt Amazon's market power - in two years OpenStack has failed to piece together a robust platform that big companies are willing to trust in serious production. This may change now that IBM and Red Hat are getting involved, but it's hard to see how OpenStack's development problems will get better, not worse, with more members.

Projects like Linux work because, while they comprise large numbers of committers, there is a clear line of authority, and that authority isn't wielded by any particular company. In the case of OpenStack, its leader is Rackspace. As cloud luminary Sam Johnston writes,

This differs sharply from Eclipse, for example, where the project founders like IBM aren't mentioned at all. While there are successful open-source companies who control communities, there are precious few examples of vibrant open-source communities that are run by a single vendor.

One big reason is trust. In the case of OpenStack, I know and like the Rackspace executives involved. But not everyone feels the same about Rackspace's OpenStack "agenda", as Christian Reilly, another noted cloud luminary, blogs and tweets:

One aspect of that agenda is a shift away from full API compatibility with Amazon's API, which is one of CloudStack's major selling points, and one of the big reasons it is striking off on its own. Rackspace could easily have followed this furrow, first plowed by Eucalyptus and VMops/Cloud.com/Citrix, but doing so would effectively cede the API battle to its bitter enemy, Amazon.

For some time, Citrix's CloudStack has credibly claimed superior technology and large-scale deployments of its technology (Zynga, anyone?). I've heard this claim substantiated by some of the biggest brands supporting OpenStack, but because of CloudStack's dubious open-source credentials, no one but Citrix was willing to bet their business on CloudStack.

This may change, now that CloudStack will be part of the Apache Software Foundation. While OpenStack comes with an Apache license, this is nowhere near the same thing as being an ASF project, as Redmonk analyst Stephen O'Grady points out:

Citrix was very careful to put the Apache Software Foundation front and center in their announcement. This does two things. First, it allows them to benefit from the halo effect of the Apache brand and the goodwill of becoming a sponsor. Second, it differentiates them from two of the more visible alternative open source cloud stacks. Eucalyptus is primarily a single vendor initiative, much as MySQL once was. OpenStack is developed by a broader community of participants, and is being transitioned to a foundation. But that process has not been without its growing pains, with one of the co-founders questioning the governance structure.

None of which is to suggest that CloudStack will have smooth sailing from here. It may have better technology, and it may find the ASF's blessing can overcome its proprietary past, but there is a lot of work to do to foster a community around CloudStack. Victory is by no means assured.

But for a growing population of people looking for an alternative platform upon which to build clouds that integrate well with Amazon's cloud, Apache-blessed CloudStack may be just what they've wanted. ®

Matt Asay is senior vice president of business development at Nodeable, offering systems management for managing and analysing cloud-based data. He was formerly SVP of biz dev at HTML5 start-up Strobe and chief operating officer of Ubuntu commercial operation Canonical. With more than a decade spent in open source, Asay served as Alfresco's general manager for the Americas and vice president of business development, and he helped put Novell on its open source track. Asay is an emeritus board member of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). His column, Open...and Shut, appears three times a week on The Register.

Broader topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Robotics and 5G to spur growth of SoC industry – report
    Big OEMs hogging production and COVID causing supply issues

    The system-on-chip (SoC) side of the semiconductor industry is poised for growth between now and 2026, when it's predicted to be worth $6.85 billion, according to an analyst's report. 

    Chances are good that there's an SoC-powered device within arm's reach of you: the tiny integrated circuits contain everything needed for a basic computer, leading to their proliferation in mobile, IoT and smart devices. 

    The report predicting the growth comes from advisory biz Technavio, which looked at a long list of companies in the SoC market. Vendors it analyzed include Apple, Broadcom, Intel, Nvidia, TSMC, Toshiba, and more. The company predicts that much of the growth between now and 2026 will stem primarily from robotics and 5G. 

    Continue reading
  • Deepfake attacks can easily trick live facial recognition systems online
    Plus: Next PyTorch release will support Apple GPUs so devs can train neural networks on their own laptops

    In brief Miscreants can easily steal someone else's identity by tricking live facial recognition software using deepfakes, according to a new report.

    Sensity AI, a startup focused on tackling identity fraud, carried out a series of pretend attacks. Engineers scanned the image of someone from an ID card, and mapped their likeness onto another person's face. Sensity then tested whether they could breach live facial recognition systems by tricking them into believing the pretend attacker is a real user.

    So-called "liveness tests" try to authenticate identities in real-time, relying on images or video streams from cameras like face recognition used to unlock mobile phones, for example. Nine out of ten vendors failed Sensity's live deepfake attacks.

    Continue reading
  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022