ISPs say AWS listed by Australian peering services

Source says co-located data centre testing under way


Amazon Web Services (AWS) is close to turning on an Australian facility, The Register has been told by a provider of IP networking services.

A staffer at the company, who asked not to be identified, added that AWS intends to offer cloud computing, as distinct from cloud storage and other AWS services. The computing service will not be served from an Amazon facility, as the company has chosen to co-locate in an existing third-party data centre in Australia.

The IP networking company's staffer told The Reg it has been approached to provide peering services.

Adding credence to that account is a similar report from a worker at an Australian ISP, who told The Reg that network operator Pipe is already providing peering services for AWS. The ISP's staffer said a management console Pipe provides to its customers last week listed AWS among customers for whom it provides peering in New South Wales. A staffer at a second IP reports traffic flowing over the link.

Pipe’s and Equinix's Sydney operations can already be identified as peers for AWS, through sources like Robtex.

While the evidence above offers more proof of AWS' intention to create a local data centre, which have previously been inferred by job ads, it is not yet utterly conclusive evidence of an Australian AWS presence. Peering exchanges are used by big internet traffic generators to ensure their data flows efficiently between network operators, instead of being forced on long, latency-inducing, routes. But as Paul Brooks of networking consultancy Layer10 told The Register, peering could be a way for AWS to speed traffic flows to offshore data centres.

We're therefore not entirely certain the involvement of Australian peers is a smoking gun for a local AWS presence, although given the job ads for data centre and infrastructure experts ran months ago it is hard not to imagine the cloudy company hasn’t cooked up something on Australian shores.

AWS is certainly vigorous here: the company staged a summit in Sydney and Melbourne last month. Customers who spoke at the Sydney event included Vodafone and News Limited and the latter said it has replaced its entire test and development platform with AWS and is considering wider use of the company's cloud services, possibly as a platform on which to host online properties. The former said it is contemplating a cloud-based CMS for all its content, after using AWS to power a live cricket broadcasting app.

Both applications are, we feel it is fair to say, latency-sensitive and could therefore benefit from a local AWS facility. But they’re not quite so sensitive that they would need the extraordinary security that AWS provides for its own data centres, which could explain the co-location option.

If it is indeed the case that Amazon will co-locate its first Australian presence, it is therefore hard to imagine governments stampeding towards the web services giant. But even if that is the case, AWS would be ahead of Microsoft and Google, both of which rely on offshore data centres. Local cloud providers would also be fearful: few can match the range of services AWS provides. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading
  • Utility biz Delta-Montrose Electric Association loses billing capability and two decades of records after cyber attack

    All together now - R, A, N, S, O...

    A US utility company based in Colorado was hit by a ransomware attack in November that wiped out two decades' worth of records and knocked out billing systems that won't be restored until next week at the earliest.

    The attack was detailed by the Delta-Montrose Electric Association (DMEA) in a post on its website explaining that current customers won't be penalised for being unable to pay their bills because of the incident.

    "We are a victim of a malicious cyber security attack. In the middle of an investigation, that is as far as I’m willing to go," DMEA chief exec Alyssa Clemsen Roberts told a public board meeting, as reported by a local paper.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021