Vendors have second stab at smart TV standard

Set to die screening?


Major TV manufacturers are making another stab at persuading their competitors to jointly develop and support a standard platform for smart TV apps.

LG and TP Vision today announced the formation of the Smart TV Alliance, a re-branded version of the partnership announced by LG, Philips and Sharp back in September 2011 at the IFA show.

Back then, the trio's goal was to create a smart TV apps platform based on open standards - it uses HTML 5, CE-HTML, HbbTV and others - to publish the SDK and get other TV makers to back it. The SDK was duly released, but they have failed to attract broader support.

Smart TV Alliance logo

But while LG remains committed to the project, original participant Sharp's name was notably absent from today's announcement, though reference was made to "other Japanese TV manufacturers in the process of joining".

Philips' circumstances have changed since in the intervening nine months too. Back then it made and sold televisions; now it doesn't. In April 2012, it quit the market and licensed its name to Asian screen maker TPV Technology, the company behind brands like AOC and Envision. The two formed a joint-venture, TP Vision. to market Philips-branded tellies. Philips has a 30 per cent stake.

TP Vision is still backing the LG initiative, but until there's solid backing from others the Alliance's efforts to become a standard seem unlikely to pay off.

The benefits are clear: app makers can write one version of their code and have it run on a range of sets. But until the Smart TV Alliance standard becomes more widely supported, they'll still have to write separate apps for Sony Bravias, Samsungs, Toshiba Regzas, Panasonic Vieras and so on.

Worse, there's a 'cake and eat it too' element to the Smart TV Alliance specification. Today's announcement also highlighted the work being done on SDK 2.0, due out by the end of the year and which developers "will be able to create applications for 2013 TV sets from participating Alliance members".

Yes, 2013 sets - but not necessarily 2012 sets. The nature of the core components means there will be some backward compatibility, but don't bank on it, the Alliance's announcement seems to suggest.

We've already seen how, for example, Sony has made a Netflix app available for its latest Bravia TVs, but flipped a finger to any customer with the audacity to own a Sony-branded smart TV from previous years.

And that's the problem: will smart TV technology ever take off when television makers, even those promoting multi-vendor standards, insist on minimising the compatibility between one year's TVs and the the next. ®


Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022