Compare the Market loses .XXX smut-squat appeal

It's not that simples, is it?


Meerkat-obsessed Compare the Market, which became the first company to lose a cybersquatting complaint over a .xxx domain name, has lost its appeal against the ruling.

BGL Group, which owns the Compare The Market brand, lost its first case against the owner of comparethemarket.xxx in May, after a Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) panel decided that the term “compare the market” was just too generic to result in a finding of cybersquatting.

At that time, panelist Mike Rodenbaugh ruled: "'[C]ompare the market' could relate to myriad different types of markets and myriad different comparisons."

But BGL, which owns a trademark on the phrase "Compare the Market", filed another complaint with the CAC a week later, essentially appealing the first ruling. That complaint has now been thrown out of court on procedural grounds.

The company is still unique among porn-squatted brands; of the 27 .xxx cybersquatting cases handled under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy this year, the other 25 have resulted in the domain being transferred to the complaining trademark holder.

Gwent resident Jon Watkins registered comparethemarket.xxx last December, shortly after .xxx domains became broadly available for public purchase, according to the latest UDRP ruling.

The fact that he used a privacy service to register the domain – shielding his name and location from public view – was used by BGL as grounds to appeal.

The company argued that had it known first time around that Watkins was a UK resident, its case that he should have been aware of the Compare the Market brand would have been much stronger.

Compare the Market is almost universally famous in the UK for its TV commercials, which use a computer generated comedy meerkat spokesperson.

But the Czech Arbitration Court panel – this time a three-person panel – rejected BGL's appeal on the basis that the company had failed to bring any new evidence to the table. The original panelist, it decided, had already considered the fact that Watkins is a UK resident.

If there was a silver lining for BGL, it was that the panel decided that its complaint did not amount to Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

It's almost unheard of for companies to file three UDRP proceedings against the same person over the same domain name. If BGL is set on owning comparethemarket.xxx, it's probably going to have to pay off its current owner, or take him to a proper court. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Red Hat effort to shut down WeMakeFedora.org deemed harassment
    IBM's Linux distro giant unable to wrestle domain name from owner

    IBM's Red Hat cannot prevent Daniel Pocock and his Software Freedom Institute SA from using the domain name WeMakeFedora.org, according to a ruling on Monday.

    Red Hat, which sponsors the development of the Fedora Linux distribution, challenged the inclusion of the trademarked term "Fedora" in the website URL, and demanded it be given the .org domain name. But under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) established by DNS oversight body ICANN, a FORUM mediator found Red Hat's objections wanting, and refused to order a transfer of the domain.

    "There are no advertisements on the respondent's website," the decision states. "There is no evidence that respondent is a competitor of complainant, nor is there any evidence that respondent has operated the website for any commercial purpose. The panel rejects complainant's submission, unsupported by evidence, that respondent's conduct is likely to have been undertaken for commercial gain."

    Continue reading
  • Nominet suspends 'single digit' number of Russian dot-UK domain registrars
    Does not wish to 'profit' from 'commercial arrangements' in Russia

    Nominet, the dot-UK domain registry, has announced that it will suspend services for Russian web domain registrars – and the British government says it "welcomes" the action.

    Suspension will prevent the registrars from managing or renewing dot-UK domains they own or control.

    "We are not accepting registrations from registrars in Russia – we are suspending the relevant tags. To avoid compromising outlets for expression outside the control of the regime, the very small number of domains with Russian address details will continue to operate as normal," said the organisation in a statement on its website.

    Continue reading
  • Ukraine asks ICANN to delete all Russian domains
    Plus: Namecheap tells customers in Russia they are no longer welcome, citing 'war crimes'

    Updated In response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine last week, Mykhailo Fedorov, First Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine, on Monday asked the head of DNS overlord ICANN to disable country code top-level domains associated with Russia.

    In an email [PDF], Fedorov asked Göran Marby, CEO of ICANN, to impose sanctions on Russia, arguing that the Putin regime has used internet infrastructure to propagandize its war effort.

    Specifically, he has asked for the revocation of domains “.ru”, “.рф”, “.su”, and others used by the Russian Federation, shutting down DNS root servers serving the Russian Federation, and contributing to the revocation of associated TLS/SSL certificates for those domains.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022