NEC looks to offload Lenovo shares

Kitchen sink next for ailing Japanese firm


Ailing Japanese electronics giant NEC looks set to sell all of its shares in Lenovo after the Chinese PC maker confirmed to The Reg that it has waived a previous restriction on the sale.

The two firms announced in January 2011 that they would be combining their PC operations in Japan, in a joint venture known as NEC Lenovo Japan Group.

As part of that deal, NEC was given 281 million Lenovo shares while the Chinese firm grabbed a 51 per cent share in the joint venture. However, part of the deal required NEC to keep its shares for at least two years after the deal closed.

The shares are now worth a whopping $240m as of Tuesday when the Hong Kong stock exchange closed, according to Bloomberg.

A Lenovo spokesperson in Hong Kong sent The Reg the following statement:

Lenovo can confirm we have granted a waiver regarding NEC shares of Lenovo stock. We believe this is an appropriate action based on NEC's requests and financing needs as well as our shared commitment to our long-term, on-going strategic partnership.

We have built a winning business in Japan together, and we will continue to look for ways to expand and extend our strategic relationship. Lenovo and NEC have momentum in the market and we expect to continue to build a leader in Japan together.

Although the two firms have aired plans to possibly extend their joint PC venture beyond Japan, and there have been rumours of a potential server tie-up, NEC’s preoccupation of late has been simply staying alive.

At the beginning of 2012, NEC forecast a net loss of ¥100bn (£820m) for 2011, after which it decided to slash its workforce by as many as 10,000.

It claimed its domestic smartphone business had been negatively impacted by “foreign vendors” while the floods in Thailand hit its operations there hard.

By contrast, Lenovo has been going from strength to strength in 2012 and isn’t far from toppling HP as the world’s number one PC maker. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022