Sophos antivirus classifies its own update kit as malware

Fix issued swiftly, but naturally difficult to install!

Sophos users woke up to mayhem on Thursday after the business-focussed antivirus firm released an update that classified itself and any other update utility as a virus.

As a result enterprise PCs running the application went haywire, generating false positives reporting SSH/Updater-B malware. Sysadmins were bombarded with automated alerts by email about the bogus problem. The issue was resolved with a functional update, issued on Wednesday evening.

For many, troubles continue because many endpoints and corporate networks hit by the false positive have been left with systems that can no longer update themselves properly because the required functionality has been consigned to quarantine.

A knowledgebase article from Sophos explaining what to do to resolve the problem can be found here.

False positives hitting antivirus updates have affected all vendors from time to time. The consequent problems are at their worst when Windows operating system files are falsely classified as potentially malign and quarantined, resulting in unstable or unusable Windows boxes.

Sophos's auto-immune screwup caused just as much if not more pain, judging by the large number of reader emails we've already received on the topic.

"About 9.20 this evening, every PC on my network (about 100 of them) started sending me an email every 10 minutes saying that a virus had been detected in one of the DLL files of Sophos Endpoint Security & Control," said Reg reader Iain H in an email that's typical of those we've received.

"It's obviously a nasty false positive - in that it is disabling the AV itself so (a) we're open to threats and (b) it may not be able to update itself when the new signatures are released," added the hard-hit admin.

Iain spent some time trying to get someone from Sophos support on the phone before receiving confirmation that a false positive was behind the snafu.

"It's a bit of a face-plant: classifying your own product as a virus. Still, I am sympathetic. Whilst 'friendly fire' is never a good thing, it's perhaps an inevitable accidental consequence of any long-running and intense conflict. However friendly fire normally means shooting your friends - not your own foot," he added.

Questions will inevitably arise about Sophos's testing and quality assurance process in the aftermath of the screw-up. Glenn C explains the impact of the problem.

"A fix was quickly released from Sophos but the auto-update program was quarantined and wasn't allowed to run.  For a home user, a quick disabling of on-access scan, update, re-enable on-access scan and remove any items marked with the Shh/Updater-B virus from quarantine fixed the issue," he said.

"For corporate users, it was a little more problematic as it's not possible to remove items from the quarantine using the Enterprise Console. You can use the Enterprise Console to push out a new policy with either on-access disabled (not recommended) or at least excluding the Sophos auto-update folder from on-access scanning.  This meant it was possible to get the latest update out to the clients - however it is still necessary to go to every single impacted system and clean out the quarantined items. Ouchie."

Customer discussion of the issue can be found here. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Healthcare organizations face rising ransomware attacks – and are paying up
    Via their insurance companies, natch

    Healthcare organizations, already an attractive target for ransomware given the highly sensitive data they hold, saw such attacks almost double between 2020 and 2021, according to a survey released this week by Sophos.

    The outfit's team also found that while polled healthcare orgs are quite likely to pay ransoms, they rarely get all of their data returned if they do so. In addition, 78 percent of organizations are signing up for cyber insurance in hopes of reducing their financial risks, and 97 percent of the time the insurance company paid some or all of the ransomware-related costs.

    However, while insurance companies pay out in almost every case and are fueling an improvement in cyber defenses, healthcare organizations – as with other industries – are finding it increasingly difficult to get insured in the first place.

    Continue reading
  • Don't let ransomware crooks spend months in your network – like this govt agency did
    Miscreants Googled for post-intrusion tools before downloading them onto servers, PCs

    Lockbit ransomware operators spent nearly six months in a government agency's network, deleting logs and using Chrome to download hacking tools, before eventually deploying extortionware, according to Sophos threat researchers.

    About a month before the unnamed US regional government agency began investigating the intrusion, the cybercriminals deleted most of the log data to cover their tracks. 

    But they didn't delete every log nor their browser search history, which meant they left some crumbs behind.

    Continue reading
  • Sophos fixes critical hijack flaw in firewall offering
    Authentication bypass followed by remote-code execution at the network boundary

    Sophos has patched a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in its firewall gear that was disclosed via its bug-bounty program.

    The supplier wrote in a brief notice on Friday that an authentication bypass flaw can be potentially exploited over the network or internet by miscreants to execute malicious code on a victim's equipment, hijacking it effectively.

    The flaw is present in the User Portal and Webadmin user interfaces of Sophos Firewall. This product, using its Xstream architecture, is supposed to both protect the network from unauthorized access and accelerate a company's software-as-a-service, software-defined WAN, and cloud traffic. It offers a range of functions, including SSL/TLS decryption and monitoring, and deep packet inspection to detect ransomware communications and other signs of intrusions or intrusion attempts.

    Continue reading
  • Backup frustration brought this CTO to forefront of ransomware protection
    Constant versioning of file systems is the way to go, Nasuni cofounder says

    Interview As CTO of The New York Times two decades ago, Andres Rodriguez became frustrated with the time-consuming and unreliable process of backing up massive amounts of data that was only tested when it failed.

    That experience led him in 2008 to launch Nasuni, building what has become a cloud-native global file platform that does away with traditional backups and instead constantly creates new versions of files that are not shipped to a backup system but instead are kept on the cloud-based platform. In addition, everything is managed – both in the cloud and on-premises – via the platform.

    Enterprises save money by not having to build extensive backup environments and they can better protect their data, said Rodriguez, who also is now Nasuni's CTO. As an added bonus, the platform also gives organizations more tools to protect against the ongoing threat of ransomware.

    Continue reading
  • VMware Horizon platform pummeled by Log4j-fueled attacks
    Miscreants deployed cryptominers, backdoors since late December, Sophos says

    VMware's Horizon virtualization platform has become an ongoing target of attackers exploiting the high-profile Log4j flaw to install backdoors and cryptomining malware.

    In a report this week, cybersecurity firm Sophos wrote that VMware's virtual desktop and applications platform has been in the crosshairs since late December, with the largest wave of attacks beginning Jan. 19 and continuing well into March. Many of the attacks are designed to deploy cryptocurrency mining malware, Sophos researchers Gabor Szappanos and Sean Gallagher wrote.

    Other motives were less clear, though some may be used by ransomware groups or initial access brokers, who gain access into targeted systems and then sell that access to threat actors to launch ransomware and other malware attacks.

    Continue reading
  • Cryptominers aren't just a headache – they're a big neon sign that Bad Things are on your network
    So says Sophos in warning about Tor2Mine Monero malware

    Cryptominer malware removal is a routine piece of the cybersecurity landscape these days. Yet if criminals are hijacking your compute cycles to mine cryptocurrencies, chances are there's something worse lurking on your network too.

    So warned Sophos threat researcher Sean Gallagher, in a recent interview with The Register as the antivirus organisation launches a report into the Tor2Mine cryptominer.

    Tor2Mine is unremarkable, other than for its persistence features. If it gets onto your network it starts mining the Monero cryptocurrency, favoured by e-crims because (unlike Bitcoin) wallets aren't publicly visible, meaning transactions can't be easily traced by investigators.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022