Telcos react coldly to renewed UK.gov smut-censoring push

You want it done, do it yourself and face the music


Telcos have once again reacted frigidly to suggestions that Prime Minister David Cameron will force ISPs to proactively offer web-blocking measures to subscribers signing up for their services.

It comes after a Daily Mail report on Saturday, citing Downing Street sources, suggested that the PM was about to call on a tightening up of parental controls online to supposedly help prevent children from accessing pornography sites and other material deemed by the government as inappropriate for youngsters.

The endgame is apparently for broadband providers to put filters in place for anyone signing up to the services who first say "Yes" when asked if they have kids. Those individuals would then reportedly be guided through a number of questions about restricting web access for their children.

In October, BT, Virgin Media, BSkyB and TalkTalk all agreed to do their bit to try and keep online smut, suicide sites and other supposedly dodgy content away from the prying eyes of young people by inking a code of practice partnership that provides customers who are parents with an "Active Choice" to block such material.

But at present TalkTalk is the only one of the Big Four telcos in the UK to impose network-level filtering on their subscribers. It's been suggested that Cameron wants this system to be the default one used by all large ISPs.

Under Number 10's apparent new measures, existing punters will also be required to be prompted by the broadband providers to install web-blocking technology. Apparently, Downing Street will tell ISPs that they have to impose such controls or else face legislation.

The PM has been warning ISPs for some time to be more robust with their plans to provide better tools to help parents censor sexualised content online, to prevent the government from stepping in with its own regulation measures.

Telcos, in the main, have scoffed at Cameron's proposals and feel that the "Active Choice" code of practice goes far enough to allay those concerns from Downing Street.

The Register asked BT, BSkyB and Virgin Media to comment on the DM report.

A Sky spokesman simply said that: "Our position hasn't changed." He then pointed us to a blog post from September this year explaining the company's current position.

Sky does filter content on its Wi-Fi hotspots service to prevent people browsing porn in coffee shops, for example. But it doesn't do the same in people's homes, instead those customers are given the opportunity of opting out of parental controls.

Virgin Media is similarly sticking to letting its subscribers decide what material they think should be accessed online in their own homes. A spokesman gave us this statement:

Virgin Media takes the protection of families very seriously and we're already committed to ensuring every customer has a clear, unavoidable choice as to whether to use the high-quality filtering tools we make available for free.

Our customers have the power to automatically prevent access to a comprehensive range of websites, add their own to the blocked list, and even limit when social networking sites can be accessed.

We're giving parents greater control and the choice they've told us they want, so we'll continue working closely with government, industry, charities, academics and law enforcement agencies to help inform families and protect children online.

BT hadn't responded to our request for comment at time of writing, but it is broadly in step with the viewpoints of Sky and Virgin Media.

Meanwhile, TalkTalk issued an opportunistic comment from its CEO Dido Harding on Saturday, who said:

TalkTalk was the first ISP to start doing this [network-level filtering] and we are still the only ISP that offers customers a solution that protects every device, where all the customer has to do is make a yes or no decision about filtering inappropriate content, without worrying about downloading software or setting up different controls on different machines.

We think [it] is the role of an ISP to provide parents with simple and effective tools which is why we developed HomeSafe and as such we are really pleased that the government is favouring this approach of making it easier for parents to keep their children safe online.

However, the Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) urged caution about the report. The broadband lobby group's Secretary General Nick Lansman told El Reg:

We are awaiting the government response to this summer's consultation on content filtering, where we were clear in our support for active choice, and are looking for much-needed clarity from government in this area.

ISPA ultimately believes parents are the best people to decide on what content is appropriate for their children and it is industry's job to equip parents with the tools to help them make these choices.

ISPs currently do this through easy-to-use active-choice filtering, on either the device or network level, and through providing advice and assistance to parents. It is important to stress that online safety also includes manufacturers, retailers and others, and should not be viewed as an ISP-only issue.

It's understood that the government will announce its plans later this month - which come after a farcical public consultation process about web-filtering that led ironically to the Department of Education breaching the Data Protection Act. ®

Bootnote

While Cameron's crew can easily be slated for their lack of understanding when it comes to shaping internet policy, the Tories are sadly in good company with the opposition when it comes to such issues.

Labour MP Helen Goodman, who is the shadow culture secretary, recently displayed her woefully inadequate knowledge of installing software on a computer, which makes her brain go "bzzzz", apparently.

As spotted by blogger Terence Eden, Goodman admitted to being "particularly stupid" about web-filtering - or as she called it: "the filter thingy" - in an independent report about online child safety from Tory MP Claire Perry earlier this year. It makes for a fun, albeit depressing, read.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • These Rapoo webcams won't blow your mind, but they also won't break the bank

    And they're almost certainly better than a laptop jowel-cam

    Review It has been a long 20 months since Lockdown 1.0, and despite the best efforts of Google and Zoom et al to filter out the worst effects of built-in laptop webcams, a replacement might be in order for the long haul ahead.

    With this in mind, El Reg's intrepid reviews desk looked at a pair of inexpensive Rapoo webcams in search for an alternative to the horror of our Dell XPS nose-cam.

    Rapoo sent us its higher-end XW2K, a 2K 30fps device and, at the other end of the scale, the 720p XW170. Neither will break the bank, coming in at around £40 and £25 respectively from online retailers, but do include some handy features, such as autofocus and a noise cancelling microphone.

    Continue reading
  • It's one thing to have the world in your hands – what are you going to do with it?

    Google won the patent battle against ART+COM, but we were left with little more than a toy

    Column I used to think technology could change the world. Google's vision is different: it just wants you to sort of play with the world. That's fun, but it's not as powerful as it could be.

    Despite the fact that it often gives me a stomach-churning sense of motion sickness, I've been spending quite a bit of time lately fully immersed in Google Earth VR. Pop down inside a major city centre – Sydney, San Francisco or London – and the intense data-gathering work performed by Google's global fleet of scanning vehicles shows up in eye-popping detail.

    Buildings are rendered photorealistically, using the mathematics of photogrammetry to extrude three-dimensional solids from multiple two-dimensional images. Trees resolve across successive passes from childlike lollipops into complex textured forms. Yet what should feel absolutely real seems exactly the opposite – leaving me cold, as though I've stumbled onto a global-scale miniature train set, built by someone with too much time on their hands. What good is it, really?

    Continue reading
  • Why Cloud First should not have to mean Cloud Everywhere

    HPE urges 'consciously hybrid' strategy for UK public sector

    Sponsored In 2013, the UK government heralded Cloud First, a ground-breaking strategy to drive cloud adoption across the public sector. Eight years on, and much of UK public sector IT still runs on-premises - and all too often - on obsolete technologies.

    Today the government‘s message boils down to “cloud first, if you can” - perhaps in recognition that modernising complex legacy systems is hard. But in the private sector today, enterprises are typically mixing and matching cloud and on-premises infrastructure, according to the best business fit for their needs.

    The UK government should also adopt a “consciously hybrid” approach, according to HPE, The global technology company is calling for the entire IT industry to step up so that the public sector can modernise where needed and keep up with innovation: “We’re calling for a collective IT industry response to the problem,” says Russell MacDonald, HPE strategic advisor to the public sector.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021