Apple loses round to Amazon in 'App Store' name dispute

False advertising? Nope. Trademark infringement? Maybe...


A US judge has ruled in Amazon's favor in a case in which Apple accused the online retail giant of false advertising in its use of the term "app store" in its Amazon Appstore for Android.

"The court finds no support for the proposition that Amazon has expressly or impliedly communicated that its Appstore for Android possesses the characteristics and qualities that the public has come to expect from the Apple APP STORE and/or Apple products," wrote Judge Phyllis Hamilton of the US District Court for the Northern District of California in a decision handed down on Wednesday approving Amazon's request for summary judgment filed last September.

"That is," Hamilton continued, "Apple has failed to establish that Amazon made any false statement (express or implied) of fact that actually deceived or had the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience."

Amazon's victory, however, is a partial one related only to Apple's assertion that the use of the term Appstore for Android was false advertising. Still at issue is whether such use is a violation of Apple's trademark on "APP STORE", which Cupertino filed on July 17, 2008, but which is still in dispute.

Microsoft is contesting that trademark application. In an Opposition to the US Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board filed in July 2010, Microsoft argued that "The undisputed evidence shows that 'app store' is a generic name for a store offering apps."

Microsoft argued in that filing that "'App' is a common generic name for the goods offered at Apple's store, as shown in dictionary definitions and by widespread use by Apple and others," and that "'Store' is generic for the 'retail store services' for which Apple seeks registration, and indeed, Apple refers to its 'App Store" as a store."

Interestingly, Microsoft quoted none other than the late Steve Jobs in its argument that APP STORE was too generic to be trademarked, noting that when criticizing the proliferation of app stores for the Android platform, Jobs said (emphasis in Microsoft's original complaint):

In addition to Google's own app marketplace, Amazon, Verizon and Vodafone have all announced that they are creating their own app stores for Android. There will be at least four app stores on Android which customers must search through to find the app they want and developers will need to work to distribute their apps and get paid.

Microsoft also argued that although Apple had cowed its competitors into not using the exact term "app store" in descriptions of their, well, app stores, press reports on them had consistently used the term "app store" to describe them, thus proving that term's generic nature.

Ah, the power of the press...

Although Wednesday's ruling removes the "false advertising" portion of Apple's complaint against Amazon, and while common sense – and Microsoft – argue against Cupertino in the trademark dispute, legal matters such as this are rarely predictable.

A date has not yet been set for the adjudication of that dispute, but as more app stores identify themselves as such, Apple's trademark case becomes weaker due to the long-standing legal precedent that the more a term is used, the more generic it becomes, and the more generic it becomes, the less trademarkable it is.

After Wednesday's ruling, you can be sure that Apple will be pushing for a speedy resolution of its trademark assertions. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021