UK armed forces could be 'fatally compromised’ by cyber attack

Say MPs, after gang-briefing from cyber-military complex


UK armed forces’ dependence on information and communication technology could leave the nation vulnerable in the event of a cyber attack, according to a study by a committee of MPs.

A report by the Commons' Defence Committee suggests that the UK Government still has some ground to cover in its approach to the nation’s cyber security even two years after placing cybersecurity as a tier one threat against the UK, on a par with global terrorism. The National Cyber Security Programme allocated £650m over five years to boost the UK's cyber-security defences. The MoD received a £90m slice of this pie.

Then in 2012-13 alone, the MoD is reaching into its own coffers to supplement these funds by £30m. But it seems even this is not enough.

The MPs heard concerns that the “trend” of using off-the-shelf commercial products is increasing military vulnerability to cyber-assault. There were also suggestions that people with the necessary skills for cyber warfare might be recruited and brought into the military, perhaps as reservists.

Chair of the Committee, Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP, said extra ministerial attention ought to be applied to develop improved cyber security.

"The Government needs to put in place – as it has not yet done – mechanisms, people, education, skills, thinking and policies which take into account both the opportunities and the vulnerabilities which cyberspace presents,” argued Arbuthnot.

Evidence received by the Committee suggested a sustained cyber assault could impede the ability of the armed forces to "operate effectively" due to their dependence on information and communication technology. The Committee quizzed MoD witnesses about its backup systems in these circumstances.

“We have asked the Government to set out details of the contingency plans it has in place should such an attack occur. If it has none, it should say so – and urgently create some,” Arbuthnot added.

Details of what types of cyberattack might be possible were left out of the committee's report.

The MPs heard testimony from academics (including John Bassett, associate fellow of Cyber-security at the Royal United Services Institute, Professor Brian Collins, chair of engineering policy at University College London, and others; military personnel including Air Vice-Marshal Jonathan Rigby, Major-General Jonathan Shaw, assistant chief of defence staff and Air Commodore Tim Bishop, head of global operations security control centre; as well as Cabinet ministers Nick Harvey MP, minister for the armed forces, and Rt Hon Francis Maude MP, the Cabinet Office minister.

Written submissions were provided by McAfee, Symantec and Trend Micro as well as BAE Systems, EADS and Raytheon. That group of six from the military industrial anti-malware complex accounted for more than half the written submissions.

Unsurprisingly after this, the MPs came away with the idea that improved MoD and industry collaboration, tied together with increased spending on cyber-security technology, was a good idea.

In a statement, the Committee said it was "impressed by aspects of the co-operation and joint working between the MoD and private sector contractors". The MPs also supported attempts to boost the cyber security sector in the UK, which would help the MoD "deliver military capabilities both to confront high-end threats and to provide a potential offensive capability".

Arbuthnot added:

“The opportunity created by cyber tools and techniques to enhance the military capabilities of our Armed Forces is clear. We want to see the MoD explore this thoroughly. For this reason, we support the use of National Cyber Security Programme funding to develop these capabilities, but also wish to be assured that the MoD will maintain its investment in existing defence intelligence services which provide a vital UK cross-government capability.”

Vendors broadly welcomed the committee's report. Martin Sutherland, Managing Director of BAE Systems Detica commented:

“The UK’s ability to defend itself against cyber attacks does not rest in the hands of any single entity. Ensuring our national and economic security in an increasingly interconnected world requires all organisations – government, public and private sector – to put in place robust cyber security defences as well as appropriate response procedures in the event of a successful attack.

“To improve the effectiveness of these measures we need to encourage more organisations to share best-practice approaches to cyber security and provide more information about the nature of the attacks they’re seeing, particularly given that many private sector firms act as suppliers to Government or are delivering essential services that our nation relies upon every day," he added.

Sutherland said that the UK is perhaps more prepared for cyber-attack than the defence committee gave it credit for.

“The UK's strategy is still going through a process of implementation; however it is progressing well and has a mature approach in comparison to many other nations. Interestingly, the UK was placed first of the G20 in its ability to withstand cyber attacks and deploy the appropriate infrastructure for a productive economy, according to Booz Allen Hamilton’s recent Cyber Power Index. However, there is still a long way to go before we can say that we are successfully countering cyber threats."

Rob Cotton, chief executive of global information assurance firm, NCC Group, stressed the need for the UK military to develop comprehensive information security policy.

“£650m has allegedly been invested in this country's cyber defences, yet instead of being drilled into real expertise it's been juggled between departmental budgets. It's particularly worrying that the best advice offered is repeatedly to simply update antivirus protection – far more sophisticated and sustained responses are needed.

"The targets of a sustained cyber threat would almost certainly include private sector businesses - from energy companies to manufacturing firms and public transport operators – as well as the military itself," he added. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Returning to the Moon on the European Service Module
    Moving to series production and dealing with the US, where things are done slightly differently

    Interview NASA has set late August as the launch window for its much-delayed Artemis I rocket. Already perched atop the booster is the first flight-ready European Service Module (ESM). Five more are in the pipeline.

    Airbus industrial manager Siân Cleaver, whom The Register met at the Goodwood Festival of Speed's Future Lab, has the task of managing the assembly of the spacecraft, which will provide propulsion, power, water, oxygen and nitrogen for the Orion capsule.

    Looking for all the world like an evolution of the European Space Agency's (ESA) International Space Station (ISS) ATV freighter, the ESM is not pressurized and measures approximately 4 meters in length, including the Orbital Maneuvering System Engine (OMSE), which protrudes from the base.

    Continue reading
  • Running DOS on 64-bit Windows and Linux: Just because you can
    DOS isn't dead. You can still run it and its apps, even now

    FOSS Fest There are still ways to run DOS apps under 64-bit Windows and Linux, and a lot of free apps to choose from.

    One of the differences between the Microsoft and Apple approaches to maintaining widely used OSes is that Apple is quite aggressive about removing backwards compatibility, while Microsoft tries hard to keep it.

    One of the few times Microsoft removed a whole compatibility layer from Windows was with the launch of 64-bit Windows, which went mainstream with Vista in 2007. 64-bit editions of Windows can't run 16-bit apps, whether they're for DOS or Windows.

    Continue reading
  • China's blockchain boosters slam crypto as Ponzi scheme
    Communists reckon Bill Gates and Warren Buffet got it right

    Executives at China's Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN) – a state-backed initiative aimed at driving the commercial adoption of blockchain technology – labelled cryptocurrency "the biggest Ponzi scheme in human history" in state-sponsored media on Sunday.

    "The author of this article believes that virtual currency is becoming the largest Ponzi scheme in human history, and in order to maintain this scam, the currency circle has tried to put on various cloaks for it," wrote Shan Zhiguang and He Yifan in the People's Daily.

    He Yifan is the CEO of startup Red Date Technology – a founding member and architect behind BSN – where he serves as executive director. Co-author Zhiguang Shan is chair of the BSN Development Alliance.

    Continue reading
  • Carnival Cruises torpedoed by US states, agrees to pay $6m after waves of cyberattacks
    Now those are some phishing boats

    Carnival Cruise Lines will cough up more than $6 million to end two separate lawsuits filed by 46 states in the US after sensitive, personal information on customers and employees was accessed in a string of cyberattacks.

    A couple of years ago, as the coronavirus pandemic was taking hold, the Miami-based biz revealed intruders had not only encrypted some of its data but also downloaded a collection of names and addresses; Social Security info, driver's license, and passport numbers; and health and payment information of thousands of people in almost every American state.

    It all started to go wrong more than a year prior, as the cruise line became aware of suspicious activity in May 2019. This apparently wasn't disclosed until 10 months later, in March 2020.

    Continue reading
  • India extends deadline for compliance with infosec logging rules by 90 days
    Helpfully announced extension on deadline day

    India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and the local Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) have extended the deadline for compliance with the Cyber Security Directions introduced on April 28, which were due to take effect yesterday.

    The Directions require verbose logging of users' activities on VPNs and clouds, reporting of infosec incidents within six hours of detection - even for trivial things like unusual port scanning - exclusive use of Indian network time protocol servers, and many other burdensome requirements. The Directions were purported to improve the security of local organisations, and to give CERT-In information it could use to assess threats to India. Yet the Directions allowed incident reports to be sent by fax – good ol' fax – to CERT-In, which offered no evidence it operates or would build infrastructure capable of ingesting or analyzing the millions of incident reports it would be sent by compliant organizations.

    The Directions were roundly criticized by tech lobby groups that pointed out requirements such as compelling clouds to store logs of customers' activities was futile, since clouds don't log what goes on inside resources rented by their customers. VPN providers quit India and moved their servers offshore, citing the impossibility of storing user logs when their entire business model rests on not logging user activities. VPN operators going offshore means India's government is therefore less able to influence such outfits.

    Continue reading
  • Hangouts hangs up: Google chat app shuts this year
    How many messaging services does this web giant need? It's gotta be over 9,000

    Google is winding down its messaging app Hangouts before it officially shuts in November, the web giant announced on Monday.

    Users of the mobile app will see a pop-up asking them to move their conversations onto Google Chat, which is yet another one of its online services. It can be accessed via Gmail as well as its own standalone application. Next month, conversations in the web version of Hangouts will be ported over to Chat in Gmail. 

    Continue reading
  • OpenSSL 3.0.5 awaits release to fix potential worse-than-Heartbleed flaw
    Though severity up for debate, and limited chips affected, broken tests hold back previous patch from distribution

    The latest version of OpenSSL v3, a widely used open-source library for secure networking using the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol, contains a memory corruption vulnerability that imperils x64 systems with Intel's Advanced Vector Extensions 512 (AVX512).

    OpenSSL 3.0.4 was released on June 21 to address a command-injection vulnerability (CVE-2022-2068) that was not fully addressed with a previous patch (CVE-2022-1292).

    But this release itself needs further fixing. OpenSSL 3.0.4 "is susceptible to remote memory corruption which can be triggered trivially by an attacker," according to security researcher Guido Vranken. We're imagining two devices establishing a secure connection between themselves using OpenSSL and this flaw being exploited to run arbitrary malicious code on one of them.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022