Lawyers seek $16m payday in Apple 'moist iDevice' settlement

Denied warranty service for your moistened kit? It's time to get in line for your pittance


The proposed settlement of the lawsuit against Apple by iPhone and iPad touch owners whose iDevices were unfairly denied warranty service when they incorrectly indicated water damage has not yet been approved by the court, but if you're one of those eligible for a payout, you can now get in line – well behind the lawyers.

Payouts for Apple's settlement of the iPhone and iPod touch Liquid Contact Indicator lawsuit

You might receive more, you might receive less

If you're one of those for whom a payout is due – a cohort that Apple enumerates as being "approximately 153,105" – a website is now available where you can register your claim to a slice of the $53m settlement that Apple agreed to in May.

As we noted at the time, the amount of those individual payouts as identified in the settlement ranges between $105 and $300, figures based on "the average amounts paid to Apple for replacement of each device type and configuration," according to the details of the settlement's conditions.

However, there's a chance that you might receive either less or more of those published averages, depending upon how many affected iDevice owners sign up for a chunk of that $53m. You may, in fact, be eligible for double the listed amounts – but no more than that, the proposed settlement admonishes – if not enough of the "Settlement Class Members" to deplete the pot register before the October 21 deadline.

Although the top possible award to an affected class member is capped at $600 – a nice little windfall, if you weren't expecting it – the real winners in the settlement are the lawyers who argued the lawsuit, which was filed in May 2010.

According to the settlement docs, the lawyers are asking the court to allot up to 30 per cent of the $53m to them for attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses. They were also kind enough to do the math for the court – that award would total "up to $15,900,000."

Don't for a moment think that the lawmen are being unnecessarily rapacious, however. They also ask that the court award additional "incentive payments" over and above the standard settlement fees to the plaintiffs who originally brought the case. How much? A princely $1,000 each – 0.006 per cent of the proposed lawyers' fee. In addition, since two of the plaintiffs are a couple, they'll only get $500 each.

The court will make its opinion known at the "Final Fairness Hearing", to be held in San Francisco on January 29, 2014. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021