Microsoft: You've got it all WRONG. It's Apple's iPad playing catch-up with our Surface

Corporate chap bemoans Cupertino's 'reality distortion field'


Microsoft's corporate mouthpiece and score-settler Frank Shaw has launched a war of words against the iPad, saying that compared to the Surface's pricing and productivity potential, Apple's slablet is "playing catch-up".

Blogging from Nokia World in Abu Dhabi, Shaw - who is perhaps best known for griping about what he saw as unfair press coverage on Windows 8 - was commenting on new slabs from Microsoft and Apple this week.

The post was titled "Apples and oranges", but he should probably have squeezed a bit of lemon in there too.

World + dog have been unimpressed by Microsoft's first shot at the tablet market, but with the new additions Shaw is out to right some literary wrongs, as he sees them, which appeared in publications after product launches.

"[It] seems like the reality distortion field typically generated by an Apple event has extended beyond Cupertino," he said, clearly envious Surface launches don't attract the same hysteria as Apple.

"Let me cut to the chase," he added, "Surface and Surface 2 both include Office… for free and are priced below the iPad 2 and the iPad Air respectively."

Of course that doesn't do much to negate the fact that, in the first generation machines, not many business people or consumers wanted a Surface RT (now the 2) or the Pro, which is why Microsoft wrote down stock by $900m.

'We literally wrote the book on getting things done'

Shaw said "too many people" are forced to carry two devices "dealing with extra cost, weight and complexity" because the iPad is a content-consumption and not a creation device.

"Helping people be productive on a tablet is a little trickier," said Shaw, but he reckons that with Office, a keyboard and the ability to use apps and documents simultaneously, Microsoft has cracked it with Surface.

He added: "We literally wrote the book on getting things done."

Now someone has got to tell the rest of the world, as a relatively small bunch of big channel hitters maybe just isn't enough - though a lack of channel partners has not hurt Apple, in the consumer space anyway.

Shaw said rivals are now quivering in the shadow of the new Surface machines, which is why, he claims, Apple dropped the fee on the iWork suite of desktop apps.

"Now, since iWork has never got much traction, and was always priced as an after thought, its hardly that surprising or significant a move. And it doesn't change the fact that its harder to get work done on a device that lacks precision input and a desktop for true side-by-side multitasking," he wrote.

"So, when I see Apple drop the price of their struggling, lightweight productivity apps, I don't see a shot across our bow, I see an attempt to play catch-up," he said.

It is incredible that Microsoft has gained lost ground in such a short space of time, at least according to Shaw, because just months ago the UK organ told us the firm was 18 months behind Apple et al.

Microsoft should perhaps be directing their ammunition more at Google, which is already has the biggest tab installed base and is on the cusp of becoming a more serious player in the enterprise.

We've asked our pals at Apple for a comment, and when if they respond we'll update. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Colocation consolidation: Analysts look at what's driving the feeding frenzy
    Sometimes a half-sized shipping container at the base of a cell tower is all you need

    Analysis Colocation facilities aren't just a place to drop a couple of servers anymore. Many are quickly becoming full-fledged infrastructure-as-a-service providers as they embrace new consumption-based models and place a stronger emphasis on networking and edge connectivity.

    But supporting the growing menagerie of value-added services takes a substantial footprint and an even larger customer base, a dynamic that's driven a wave of consolidation throughout the industry, analysts from Forrester Research and Gartner told The Register.

    "You can only provide those value-added services if you're big enough," Forrester research director Glenn O'Donnell said.

    Continue reading
  • D-Wave deploys first US-based Advantage quantum system
    For those that want to keep their data in the homeland

    Quantum computing outfit D-Wave Systems has announced availability of an Advantage quantum computer accessible via the cloud but physically located in the US, a key move for selling quantum services to American customers.

    D-Wave reported that the newly deployed system is the first of its Advantage line of quantum computers available via its Leap quantum cloud service that is physically located in the US, rather than operating out of D-Wave’s facilities in British Columbia.

    The new system is based at the University of Southern California, as part of the USC-Lockheed Martin Quantum Computing Center hosted at USC’s Information Sciences Institute, a factor that may encourage US organizations interested in evaluating quantum computing that are likely to want the assurance of accessing facilities based in the same country.

    Continue reading
  • Bosses using AI to hire candidates risk discriminating against disabled applicants
    US publishes technical guide to help organizations avoid violating Americans with Disabilities Act

    The Biden administration and Department of Justice have warned employers using AI software for recruitment purposes to take extra steps to support disabled job applicants or they risk violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

    Under the ADA, employers must provide adequate accommodations to all qualified disabled job seekers so they can fairly take part in the application process. But the increasing rollout of machine learning algorithms by companies in their hiring processes opens new possibilities that can disadvantage candidates with disabilities. 

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the DoJ published a new document this week, providing technical guidance to ensure companies don't violate ADA when using AI technology for recruitment purposes.

    Continue reading
  • How ICE became a $2.8b domestic surveillance agency
    Your US tax dollars at work

    The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has spent about $2.8 billion over the past 14 years on a massive surveillance "dragnet" that uses big data and facial-recognition technology to secretly spy on most Americans, according to a report from Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy and Technology.

    The research took two years and included "hundreds" of Freedom of Information Act requests, along with reviews of ICE's contracting and procurement records. It details how ICE surveillance spending jumped from about $71 million annually in 2008 to about $388 million per year as of 2021. The network it has purchased with this $2.8 billion means that "ICE now operates as a domestic surveillance agency" and its methods cross "legal and ethical lines," the report concludes.

    ICE did not respond to The Register's request for comment.

    Continue reading
  • Fully automated AI networks less than 5 years away, reckons Juniper CEO
    You robot kids, get off my LAN

    AI will completely automate the network within five years, Juniper CEO Rami Rahim boasted during the company’s Global Summit this week.

    “I truly believe that just as there is this need today for a self-driving automobile, the future is around a self-driving network where humans literally have to do nothing,” he said. “It's probably weird for people to hear the CEO of a networking company say that… but that's exactly what we should be wishing for.”

    Rahim believes AI-driven automation is the latest phase in computer networking’s evolution, which began with the rise of TCP/IP and the internet, was accelerated by faster and more efficient silicon, and then made manageable by advances in software.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022