Google patents ROBO-TAXIS to ferry punters into advertiser's shops, restaurants, etc for free

In Soviet Google, advertisers DRIVE YOU


What's holding you back from online shopping? Not being to touch or test drive the thing you desire before splashing the cash? What if someone were to drive you to the store, dealership or wherever, to seal the deal for free? Great idea, huh?

Well, Google just patented it. The web ad kingpin, which designs self-driving cars and acquires military-grade robots, has come up with a system to ferry punters to advertisers, door to door, and work out who picks up the fare.

The rubber-stamped technology factors in location, the distance to travel, how busy the punter is, whether a competitor will pay more to take the customer elsewhere, gasoline prices and other costs to calculate the return on taxiing a potential customer to a shop, restaurant, office or other place of business.

It can suggest whether it's worth the advertiser's while to foot the entire travel bill or just part of it. In doing so, Google – which is all over artificial intelligence at the moment – believes it can help provide a cost analysis for a subsidized shuttle service. Of course, if an advertiser doesn't want to use a human-driven cab, the patent describes autonomous vehicles, too.

"The present invention relates generally to arranging for free or discounted transportation to an advertiser's business location," the document states. "More specifically, aspects of the invention involve automatically comparing the cost of transportation and the potential profit from a completed transaction using real-time analysis."

It goes on to say businesses can be located way out of town, where land is cheap and plentiful, because the Google taxi service will shuttle customers to them:

Getting a potential customer to a business location in order to conduct a sale may be one of the most difficult tasks for a business or advertiser. An advertiser may have to offer various inducements, such as coupons, discounts, parking validations, etc., in order to entice customers to the location. In some examples, “brick and mortar” businesses may even be forced to invest in more costly real estate near high-traffic areas as opposed to lower-cost real estate in more isolated locations. Occasionally, products may have higher profit margins for the advertiser which justify providing customers with free or low cost transportation (such as rental car agencies).

Naturally, the design goes on to describe how taxis can provide targeted advertisements to passengers, how the system can pay referrals to cabbies for recommended places to go, and so on.

Given Google's keen interest in robotics, self-driving vehicles and artificial intelligence, this patent paints a rather interesting (or terrifyingly dystopian, depending on your view) world in which a fleet of autonomous taxis pick you up, feed you ads, and drop you off in the middle of nowhere to the highest bidder.

It is worth noting, however, that the proposed service exists only on paper, and may never materialize, to the best of our knowledge, of course. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Google has more reasons why it doesn't like antitrust law that affects Google
    It'll ruin Gmail, claims web ads giant

    Google has a fresh list of reasons why it opposes tech antitrust legislation making its way through Congress but, like others who've expressed discontent, the ad giant's complaints leave out mention of portions of the proposed law that address said gripes.

    The law bill in question is S.2992, the Senate version of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which is closer than ever to getting votes in the House and Senate, which could see it advanced to President Biden's desk.

    AICOA prohibits tech companies above a certain size from favoring their own products and services over their competitors. It applies to businesses considered "critical trading partners," meaning the company controls access to a platform through which business users reach their customers. Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta in one way or another seemingly fall under the scope of this US legislation. 

    Continue reading
  • Makers of ad blockers and browser privacy extensions fear the end is near
    Overhaul of Chrome add-ons set for January, Google says it's for all our own good

    Special report Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.

    Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.

    The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.

    Continue reading
  • UK competition watchdog seeks to make mobile browsers, cloud gaming and payments more competitive
    Investigation could help end WebKit monoculture on iOS devices

    The United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Friday said it intends to launch an investigation of Apple's and Google's market power with respect to mobile browsers and cloud gaming, and to take enforcement action against Google for its app store payment practices.

    "When it comes to how people use mobile phones, Apple and Google hold all the cards," said Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, in a statement. "As good as many of their services and products are, their strong grip on mobile ecosystems allows them to shut out competitors, holding back the British tech sector and limiting choice."

    The decision to open a formal investigation follows the CMA's year-long study of the mobile ecosystem. The competition watchdog's findings have been published in a report that concludes Apple and Google have a duopoly that limits competition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022