US prosecutors drop hyperlink charges against Barrett Brown

A little sanity returns to the world


US federal prosecutors have moved to withdraw all but six of the seventeen charges levelled against Barrett Brown.

Brown has been fighting charges that he trafficked in data that was stolen in the Stratfor hack. The most controversial of the charges were that he had committed a crime by sharing a hyperlink to a file containing data (including credit card numbers) copied from Stratfor by the original attackers.

Prosecutors had hoped to load up Brown's charges on the basis that copying a hyperlink from wikisend.com from the Anonops IRC to his own channel constituted a crime.

Brown's lawyers had filed this motion (PDF) dated March 5 for the hyperlinking charges to be dropped on First Amendment grounds. His defence team also asserted that the prosecutors made an error of fact in the indictment: they had alleged that Brown was involved in transferring “authentication features” (that is, credit card data). The defence argued that the indictment failed to allege that he transferred anything other than a hyperlink.

For those following the case closely, the charges dismissed are count 1 and counts 3-12 of the Superseding Indictment against Brown. The prosecutors' motion doesn't explain why the prosecutors have backed away from the controversial charges.

Prosecutors are still pursuing charges that Brown committed fraud in relation to the Stratfor hack, that he attempted to hide laptops containing evidence, that he threatened an FBI officer in a YouTube video, and that he published information about the FBI officer and his family. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022