Slippery Google greases up, aims to squirm out of EU privacy grasp

Will the huge advertising firm manage to spin its way free of the law?

'A digital superstate that can navigate its floating kingdom undisturbed by nation-states and their laws'

Google has assembled a SOPA-style "populist" campaign designed to persuade bureaucrats and the media that the ECJ's privacy ruling is unworkable - before it's had a chance to work.

Google's strategy appears to be similar to Microsoft's in times past, when it was ordered by a US judge to demonstrate a version of Windows with Internet Explorer "disentangled". It turned up with a modified, "disentangled" copy of Windows that wouldn't boot. It was saying: "See, if we comply with your crazy order, you stupid judge - everything breaks."

The Process

The question is - will Google succeed? Here's how the new data protection changes are working their way through the EU machinery.

The EU views "a strong EU General Data Protection framework" as "essential for the completion of the Digital Single Market", a goal it wants to declare in 2015. So it's updating these regulations: Directive 95/46, which established how Freedom of Information and data privacy work in Europe. The UK adopted this in 1998.

The new framework was announced two years ago, in January 2012. This can be read in detail in here and here.

The EU parliament approved them with a plenary vote in March this year - meaning they're set in stone - almost. The final step is adoption by the Council of Ministers. On Friday the Council met in Luxembourg to discuss data protection.

American companies are hardly flavour of the month in Brussels following the Snowden revelations. Google is trying to fend off a full investigation into how it treats third party businesses in its search results, and over its grip on the digital market. Google's privacy rap sheet illustrates the range of data protection concerns. And that was all acquired before it bought home-monitoring outfit NEST.

In April, Mathias Döpfner, the boss of Axel Springer, described Google as "a kind of superstate that can navigate its floating kingdom undisturbed by any and all nation-states and their laws". (Here in pdf).

That makes it all the more likely that American companies will have to conform to Pillar Two of the Commission's Proposal:

Pillar Two: Non-European companies will have to stick to European data protection law if they operate on the European market ...

At this stage, could an amendment be tabled that defies the Commission, the Parliament, and the CJEU - one that simply excludes Google from European Law?

In theory, yes - but given the context, this is unlikely, thinks Serena Tierney ‎Head of Intellectual Property at commercial law firm Bircham Dyson Bell.

"It could, but I don't think it would. The Court makes it clear that this decision is to strike a balance two fundamental rights: privacy and freedom of expression."

The Germans in particular feel so strongly about privacy, that such a move would be an affront. Google can dream of a world without laws to inhabit its behaviour. It's not going to get a world without Germans.

Last week the Article 29 Working Party met and issued a strongly worded statement.

It vowed to investigate if Google refused to abide by the CJEU ruling, promising to develop "a coordinated response to complaints of data subjects if search engines do not erase their content whose removal has been requested.

It added all search engines are "to put in place user-friendly and pedagogical tools for the exercise by their users of their right to request the deletion of the search results links containing information relating to them. More generally, search engines should ensure compliance with the opinion of the WP29 on data protection issues related to search engines (WP148)".

Google has flooded Brussels with lobbyists, but this may not be an adequate response to regulators on a continent growing weary of what is more and more perceived as US arrogance. Sources familiar with the Article 29 Working Party tell us that after it wrote to Google in 2012 reminding it that its privacy policy broke EU law, Google failed to reply.

That imperial indifference to different cultural practices is coming back to haunt Google. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Deepfake attacks can easily trick live facial recognition systems online
    Plus: Next PyTorch release will support Apple GPUs so devs can train neural networks on their own laptops

    In brief Miscreants can easily steal someone else's identity by tricking live facial recognition software using deepfakes, according to a new report.

    Sensity AI, a startup focused on tackling identity fraud, carried out a series of pretend attacks. Engineers scanned the image of someone from an ID card, and mapped their likeness onto another person's face. Sensity then tested whether they could breach live facial recognition systems by tricking them into believing the pretend attacker is a real user.

    So-called "liveness tests" try to authenticate identities in real-time, relying on images or video streams from cameras like face recognition used to unlock mobile phones, for example. Nine out of ten vendors failed Sensity's live deepfake attacks.

    Continue reading
  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading
  • Conti: Russian-backed rulers of Costa Rican hacktocracy?
    Also, Chinese IT admin jailed for deleting database, and the NSA promises no more backdoors

    In brief The notorious Russian-aligned Conti ransomware gang has upped the ante in its attack against Costa Rica, threatening to overthrow the government if it doesn't pay a $20 million ransom. 

    Costa Rican president Rodrigo Chaves said that the country is effectively at war with the gang, who in April infiltrated the government's computer systems, gaining a foothold in 27 agencies at various government levels. The US State Department has offered a $15 million reward leading to the capture of Conti's leaders, who it said have made more than $150 million from 1,000+ victims.

    Conti claimed this week that it has insiders in the Costa Rican government, the AP reported, warning that "We are determined to overthrow the government by means of a cyber attack, we have already shown you all the strength and power, you have introduced an emergency." 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022