Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Boffins urge European Commission to reboot electric brain project

Billion-Euro simulated mind project criticised for narrow thinking

More than four hundred scientists have signed an open letter asking the European Commission to rethink the Human Brain Project (HBP), a €1.19b attempt to build a computer capable of simulating the human brain.

The HBP has been pitched as beneficial for neuroscience and computer science. The former discipline gets a whole new instrument with which to work. The latter field gets stimulus to develop all manner of new technologies required to build the HBP. Europe gets funds to develop those technologies, and hopefully a chance to commercialise them.

The letter doesn't object to the computing side of things, but does worry that a recently-released Framework Proposal Agreement for those seeking funding from the project narrows its aims unhelpfully.

The signatories therefore “ … strongly question whether the goals and implementation of the HBP are adequate to form the nucleus of the collaborative effort in Europe that will further our understanding of the brain.” The letter calls for substantial changes to management to ensure the project meets its goals.

If the changes aren't made, the signatory boffins say they won't apply for HBP funding.

The Reg's neuroscience desk is best described as a figment of our imagination, so we lack the knowledge to judge whether a boycott by the signatories would leave the project short of the … erm … brains required to make it a success.

That so many scientists feel the HBP's current structure and direction mean it is unlikely to be more than a thought bubble nonetheless seems cause for concern, if only because the project is publicly-funded. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like