Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Secret Senate software stoush: Greens intervene

'Vexatious' ROI requester has win in Canberra

The ongoing saga of the Australian Senate's vote-counting software has taken an unexpected turn, with the country's Senate passing a motion to require the release of the code.

As Vulture South readers will recall, an individual, Michael Cordover, lodged an FOI request for the release of the code after Australia's 2013 election.

Cordover had requested “the source code of the software, along with scripts and interpreted code; along the data specifications the AEC used in writing the software”, but his request was turned down because the Australian Electoral Commission decided the software contained trade secrets and would diminish the EasyCode software's commercial value.

This was received with raised eyebrows at the time, since the software has no competition in Australia and is only used for national Senate elections. Cordover then sought crowd-funding to appeal the decision.

The AEC's response was to threaten to label him “vexatious” which, if successful, would have prevented him from lodging future FOI requests.

Now, the Senate has passed a motion moved by the Greens to release the software, along with correspondence on why the original FOI request was refused.

Greens Senator Lee Rhiannon says in her media statement that the complex methodology in the software “should be publicly available”. ®

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like