Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Groupon sales reps' overtime pay suit not eligible for class action

Judge reckons their jobs were too different to be lumped into one court case

Groupon sales staff have failed to get class action status for their lawsuit against the firm, which accuses the voucher bazaar of not bothering to pay them for overtime before and after its 2011 IPO.

The employees were trying to get all sales workers in on the action by getting class status for the suit, but Chicago judge Edmond Chang said that their claims, job duties and alleged injuries varied too widely to allow them to sue as a group.

“Variations in Account Reps’ actual job duties and their individualised damages claims prevent Plaintiffs from establishing commonality and predominance,” he said in his written opinion.

“The types of duties that each Account Rep performed, the amount of time each Account Rep spent on a certain duty, and also the amount of independence and discretion Account Reps could exercise has varied from employee to employee.”

However, Chang has offered to consider a narrower class for the action, giving the plaintiffs until 23 September to work one out. Failing that, the reps will have to pursue their claims individually.

The judge pointed out that sales staff’s job duties have gotten less disparate over time, offering potential indications of where the plaintiffs could look to narrow the field.

“Some of the Account Reps’ job duties have become more uniform as Groupon has implemented company-wide management policies over time,” he said, adding that a specific time, which has been redacted from documents, could be taken as a potential start point for the class.

The coupon shop allegedly avoided paying its sales reps for overtime by classing them as “exempt” from state and federal overtime requirements and only giving them their salary plus commission during two time periods in 2011, according to court documents.

For another period the same year, Groupon was paying for overtime, but the suing sales staff claim that the firm failed to correctly calculate their pay during that time. They further claim that they were never exempt from overtime in the other parts of the year. ®

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like