Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Oz fed police in PDF redaction SNAFU

Give us your metadata, we'll publish your data

You can't make this stuff up: one of the lead agencies involved in agitating for Australia to implement a data retention regime has fallen prey to not knowing how to properly redact information in PDFs.

The Guardian Australia which broke the story, saying documents the AFP provided to parliament contained the sensitive information.

That story doesn't identify the source of the problem, but links to the documents it references remain in Google Cache*.

As The Guardian states: “the AFP provided documents to the Senate, which were then made publicly available online on parliamentary sites and other sources for several years, and which accidentally disclosed information about the subjects and focus of criminal investigations and telecommunications interception activities.”

The sensitive information included a surveillance target's address, the offences being investigated, officers' names and other information. The AFP has reported the breach to the Australian Privacy Commissioner.

It's not the first time an Australian government agency has made an utter hash of trying to redact information from PDF documents. It's not even the first time in 2014: in February this year, the Department of Immigration released the names of and addresses of asylum-seekers in a PDF-creation snafu. ®

*Bootnote: The Register has decided not to link to the cached information. ®

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like