What's this 'pay as you go' cloud crap? Dunno about you, but my apps don't work that way

Why you pay for what you provision


Different clouds for different folks

This isn't to say that one should consider a hybrid IaaS cloud like vCloud Air the solution to all ills. If I was at a point that I could throw away my application and rework it from the ground up, I'd be a fool to code it for vCloud Air.

If I was American, I'd develop it for Amazon. It's cheaper on average than Microsoft Azure, and Amazon is ever so vaguely less creepy than Google. If I was not American, I'd code it for OpenStack. I might write it for Docker, once Docker has things like FT, HA and vMotion, but I'm honestly not sure why I'd bother, since Docker seems like more work than AWS and doesn't offer a fraction of the flexibility you get when using a proper hypervisor.

So from one angle, VMware, and to a lesser extent Microsoft, have the best tech to solve the "moving legacy workloads into the cloud and back out again on a whim" problem. What both companies need now is a licensing (and marketing) scheme that is less "cloud hippie" and more "acknowledging the harsh realities of how applications are utilized in the real world by real companies."

Fighting the old guard

If they don't, they will be eaten alive by OpenStack, which absolutely doesn't have bizarre licensing constraints. Contrary to popular boardroom belief, OpenStack is taking off. Every single enterprise – and most small to medium businesses above 500 seats – that I talk to are running proof-of-concept setups right now. They're learning the tech, and regionalized cloud providers are springing up like weeds.

That last bit is important. American companies cannot get it through their heads how deep the distrust is of American cloud providers, and how much that distrust is growing. There is a market opportunity to be had here, and companies around the world are seizing upon it.

Before you make the mistake of writing off regional OpenStack vendors as irrelevant startups, I should point out that some of the biggest OpenStack cloud providers around the world are telecommunications companies. They have been looking for a new revenue stream for ages, and they've finally found it.

The telcos can stand up an OpenStack cloud quickly and easily. They have resources, they have the financing, they have a long history of finding the sweet spot in subscription revenues that people are willing to pay … and they own the pipes.

Let's say my telco says to me: "I have a cloud. Put your workloads into it and you won't pay for bandwidth that is between your corporate and home connections that are on our network and your systems in our cloud. You'll only pay for 'off network' traffic such as connectivity to the greater internet."

That's a hell of a deal, and suddenly a lot of the unpredictable costs of cloud computing evaporate.

The right cloud for the job

In the real world, real companies have applications that can't burst, won't be rewritten to do so, and need to sit idle for 16 or more hours of the day, but still be ready to serve their workloads at an instant's notice. If VMware is to succeed with vCloud Air's – or Microsoft with Azure – they will have to figure out a way to allow those sorts of workloads to exist on their infrastructure and still be affordable.

If they want hybrid cloud setups to be a success outside of the US then they'll need service provider licensing that allows third-party companies (ie: companies with zero US legal attack surface) to stand up compatible clouds at prices that don't terrorize the customer – and still leave margin for the cloud provider.

They will also have to put aside the notion that they can simply throw marketing at the problem, and have customers believe that the cloud is actually "pay for what you use." It's pay for what you provision, and the winning hybrid cloud vendor will be the one that acknowledges that first. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Millions of people's info stolen from MGM Resorts dumped on Telegram for free
    Meanwhile, Twitter coughs up $150m after using account security contact details for advertising

    Miscreants have dumped on Telegram more than 142 million customer records stolen from MGM Resorts, exposing names, postal and email addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth for any would-be identity thief.

    The vpnMentor research team stumbled upon the files, which totaled 8.7 GB of data, on the messaging platform earlier this week, and noted that they "assume at least 30 million people had some of their data leaked." MGM Resorts, a hotel and casino chain, did not respond to The Register's request for comment.

    The researchers reckon this information is linked to the theft of millions of guest records, which included the details of Twitter's Jack Dorsey and pop star Justin Bieber, from MGM Resorts in 2019 that was subsequently distributed via underground forums.

    Continue reading
  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022